Search

Rationale & objective During the COVID-19 pandemic, patients receiving maintenance dialysis are a highly vulnerable population due to their comorbidities and circumstances that limit physical distancing during treatment. This study sought to characterize the risk factors for and outcomes following COVID-19 infection in this population. Study design Retrospective cohort study. Setting & participants Maintenance dialysis patients in clinics with at least one patient with a positive test for SARS-CoV-2 from February to June 2020, treated by a mid-size national dialysis provider. Predictors Demographics, dialysis characteristics, residence in a congregate setting, comorbid conditions, measures of frailty, and use of selected medications. Outcomes COVID-19 defined as having a positive SARS-CoV-2 test and all-cause mortality among those with COVID-19. Analytical approach Logistic regression analyses to identify clinical characteristics associated with COVID-19and risk factors associated with mortality among patients following COVID-19. Results 438/7948 (5.5%) maintenance dialysis patients developed COVID-19. Male sex, Black race, in-center dialysis (vs. home dialysis), treatment at an urban clinic, residence in a congregate setting, and greater comorbidity were associated with contracting COVID-19. Odds of COVID-19 was 17-fold higher for those residing in a congregate setting [OR = 17.10 (95% CI 13.51, 21.54)]. Of the 438 maintenance dialysis patients with COVID-19, 109 (24.9%) died. Older age, heart disease, and markers of frailty were associated with mortality. Limitations No distinction between symptomatic and asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 positivity, with asymptomatic screening limited by testing capacity during this initial COVID-19 surge period. Conclusions COVID-19 is common among patients receiving maintenance dialysis, particularly those residing in congregate settings. Among maintenance dialysis patients with COVID-19, mortality is high, exceeding 20%.

Background: Medication-related problems are common in hemodialysis (HD) patients. These patients often require 12 medications to treat 5 to 6 comorbid conditions. Medication-related problem research reports cannot be generalized to the entire HD population because data are obtained from single centers and limited numbers of patients. We conducted a pooled analysis to gain additional insight into the frequency, type, and severity of medication-related problems and extrapolated the data to the entire US HD population. Methods: Articles were identified through a MEDLINE search (1962 to March 2004). Seven studies were included in the analysis. Medication-related problems were categorized into the following 9 categories: indication without drug therapy, drug without indication, improper drug selection, subtherapeutic dosage, overdosage, adverse drug reaction, drug interaction, failure to receive drug, and inappropriate laboratory monitoring. A medication-related problem appearance rate was determined. Results: We identified 1,593 medication-related problems in 395 patients (51.2% men; age, 52.4 ± 8.2 years; 42.7% with diabetes). The most common medication-related problems found were inappropriate laboratory monitoring (23.5%) and indication without drug therapy (16.9%). Dosing errors accounted for 20.4% of medication-related problems (subtherapeutic dosage, 11.2%; overdosage, 9.2%). The medication-related problem appearance rate was 5.75e−0.37x, where x equals number of months of follow-up (P = 0.02). Conclusion: HD patients experience ongoing medication-related problems. Reduction in medication-related problems in dialysis patients may improve quality of life and result in decreased morbidity and mortality. Pharmacists are uniquely trained to detect and manage medication-related problems. Pharmacists should be an integral member of the dialysis health care team.

Cefazolin dialytic clearance has not been determined in patients undergoing hemodialysis with high-efficiency or high-flux dialyzers. The objective of this study is to determine the pharmacokinetics and dialytic clearance of cefazolin and develop dosing strategies in these patients. Twenty-five uninfected subjects undergoing chronic thrice-weekly hemodialysis were administered a single dose of intravenous cefazolin (15 mg/kg) after their standard hemodialysis session. Fifteen subjects underwent hemodialysis with high-efficiency hemodialyzers, and 10 subjects underwent hemodialysis with high-flux hemodialyzers. Blood and urine samples were collected serially over the interdialytic period, during the next intradialytic period, and immediately after the next hemodialysis session. Serum and urine concentrations of cefazolin were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography. Differential equations describing a two-compartment model were fit to the cefazolin serum concentration-time data over the study period, and pharmacokinetic parameters were determined. Mean dialytic clearance values for cefazolin were significantly greater in the high-flux group compared with the high-efficiency group (30.9 +/- 6.52 versus 18.0 +/- 6.26 mL/min, respectively; P: < 0.05). Cefazolin reduction ratios were significantly greater (0.62 +/- 0.08 versus 0.50 +/- 0.07; P: < 0.005) in the high-flux group compared with the high-efficiency group and correlated well with equilibrated urea reduction. The pharmacokinetic model developed from patient data was used to simulate cefazolin serum concentration data for high-efficiency and high-flux dialyzers. Cefazolin doses of 15 or 20 mg/kg after each hemodialysis session maintained adequate serum concentrations throughout a 2- or 3-day interdialytic period regardless of hemodialyzer type.