Search

Background This study evaluates the safety and feasibility of combined resection for patients with synchronous pulmonary and esophageal cancer. Methods Patients undergoing esophagectomy between 1997 and 2019 were identified from prospectively collected databases at three tertiary referral centers, and those with combined anatomic lung resection at the same setting were identified. This cohort was then matched in a 1:3 ratio to esophagectomy alone cases, based on age, sex, pathologic stage, neoadjuvant therapy, and surgical procedure. Demographic data, peri-operative data, post-operative complications were compared. Statistical analysis included unpaired t-test, Fisher’s exact or chi-squared test and Gehan-Breslow analysis. Results Of 4729 esophagectomies, combined anatomic lung resection was performed in 18 patients with discrete pulmonary lesions. Matching yielded 49 patients who underwent esophagectomy only and was statistically similar compared to patients undergoing combined resections. Ivor Lewis esophagectomy and lobectomy were the most frequent procedures. Combined resections did not have a higher overall complication rate than esophagectomy alone, rather these patients had fewer overall complications (56% vs 84%; p=0.02). Specifically, there was not difference in anastomotic leak (17% vs. 18%) or pulmonary complications (39% vs. 33%) between combined resection and esophagectomy alone. No post-operative mortality was identified, and median overall survival was 4.1 years versus 6.5 years (p=0.10). Conclusions Patients with synchronous localized lung and esophageal cancer, although rare, should not be biased towards non-surgical therapy, as the morbidity associated with combined esophagectomy and anatomic lung resection does not differ significantly from esophagectomy alone in this highly selected group of patients.