Search

Rationale and Objectives In February 2020, administrators for the US medical licensing examination (USMLE) announced that Step 1 reporting would change to pass/fail in hopes of reducing the overemphasis of USMLE performance on the residency selection system and improving medical student well-being. Our objective was to determine the perspectives of diagnostic radiology (DR), interventional radiology (IR), and nuclear medicine (NM) program directors (PDs) regarding pass/fail USMLE Step 1 scoring. Materials and Methods A survey composed of thirteen questions on a three-point Likert scale, five demographic questions, and a free-text question was distributed to 179 DR, 84 IR, and 34 NM PDs from ACGME-accredited residency programs. Results In total, 140 unique responses were obtained (response rate = 47.1%). The PD respondents had a male predominance of 79.1%, average age of 46 ± 7.2 years, and average tenure of 5.9 ± 5.2 years. A majority of PDs (69.6%) disagreed that the change is a good idea, and a minority (21.6%) believe the change will improve medical student well-being. Further, 90.7% of PDs believe a pass/fail format will make it more difficult to objectively compare applicants and most will place more emphasis on USMLE Step 2 scores and medical school reputation (89.3% and 72.7%, respectively). Conclusion The lasting impact of pass/fail Step 1 scoring are uncertain and many radiology PDs do not support this change. While the central motivations to reduce the overemphasis on USMLE Step 1 performance and improve medical student well-being are admirable, it remains to be seen if pass/fail scoring will accomplish these goals.

A 31-year-old pregnant woman at 22 weeks and 2 days of gestation presented to the emergency room with complaints of painless hematuria and passage of clots. Initial computed tomography angiography (CTA) of the abdomen and pelvis performed after ultrasound revealed evidence of blood products in the bladder. However, the CTA did not reveal any source of bleeding. Given hemodynamic instability and persistent pain, the patient was taken to the operating room for a cystoscopy, which revealed bleeding from the left renal unit, giving rise to suspicion of a renal arteriovenous malformation (AVM). The patient then underwent left renal digital subtraction angiography (DSA), which produced no evidence of active bleeding. Due to high clinical suspicion and ongoing symptomatic hematuria, she underwent DSA a second time, which did demonstrate renal AVM bleeding, and embolization was performed. This case highlights the importance of cystoscopy in diagnosing a renal AVM in a pregnant patient despite the risks of general anesthesia during pregnancy., Highlights • Diagnosis of renal arteriovenous malformations during pregnancy can be difficult. • A high index of suspicion is necessary to diagnose renal arteriovenous malformation. • Diagnosis and management of a woman at 22 weeks of gestation are described. • The patient subsequently had an uneventful pregnancy and delivered at term.

Introduction and importance Pseudoaneurysms secondary to traumatic vessel wall disruption are a rare but potentially fatal complication after traumatic injury. The majority of the cases are found incidentally. Case presentation An 80-year-old woman was brought into our Level 1 Trauma Center after sustaining a ground-level fall with significant facial swelling. Her imaging revealed an acute traumatic comminuted fracture of the right mandibular condyle and left mandibular ramus. The patient underwent closed maxillomandibular fixation (MMF) to stabilize fractures, and allow the swelling to decrease for definitive fixation. During the definitive procedure, profuse bleeding was encountered. CT angiography evaluation was immediately performed and determined the presence of a left internal maxillary artery pseudoaneurysm which was successfully treated by coil and glue embolization. Clinical discussion This case highlights an unusual presentation of a vascular injury following major traumatic mandibular fracture and its management. Mandibular fractures have been reported in a series of cases to be a risk factor for vascular injuries. When a vascular injury is suspected, or the evaluation is unclear, surgeons should carefully determine the necessity to perform additional studies like CT angiogram. Vascular injuries secondary to mandibular fractures can be fatal if left unrecognized and untreated. Hence adequate recognition and treatment are warranted to avoid prolonged length of stay with bad outcomes. Conclusion Optimal management of pseudoaneurysms is achieved by endovascular approach with prior resuscitation and adequate hemodynamic stabilization. Open surgical management is deferred only for those cases where endovascular treatment is not available, or disruption is found intraoperatively., Highlights • This case highlights an unusual presentation of a vascular injury following major traumatic mandibular fracture and its management. • Mandibular fractures have been reported in a series of cases to be a risk factor for vascular injuries. When a vascular injury is suspected, surgeons should carefully determine the necessity to perform additional imaging studies. • Vascular injuries secondary to mandibular fractures can be fatal if left unrecognized and untreated.