Search

Background Red blood cell transfusion after coronary artery bypass graft surgery has been associated with increased late all-cause death. Yet, whether this association is, first, independent of the packed red blood cells and perioperative morbidity association, and second, of a cardiac versus noncardiac etiology remains unknown. Methods We analyzed patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery at two Ohio hospitals (n = 6,947) from 1994 to 2007. Salvage operations and patients with preoperative renal failure were excluded. Long-term outcomes and leading cause of death (cardiac, noncardiac, all cause) were derived from the US Social Security Death Index and later from Ohio Department of Health Death Index. Fifteen-year mortality cumulative incidence functions were compared for transfusion groups (yes, n = 2,540; no, n = 4,806) overall, and then stratified based on perioperative complications status (yes, n = 2,638; no, n = 4,708). Comprehensive, 32 covariates, risk-adjusted transfusion effects were estimated by competing risk regression. Results were confirmed by propensity score adjusted analysis. Results Perioperative transfusions and complications occurred in 33.9% and 35.2% of patients, respectively. In all, 3,108 deaths (48.1%) have been documented (median time to death, 7.43 years). Both transfusion rates (25.6% versus 49.1%, p p Conclusions Perioperative red blood cells transfusion is associated with significant adverse late death effects among both complicated patients and noncomplicated patients, principally seen between 0 and 5 years postoperatively, and is driven by both increased cardiovascular and noncardiovascular mortality. Further studies are needed to elucidate the mechanisms behind these findings, including their potential dose dependence.

Background Tetraplegia caused by cervical spinal cord injury is devastating for patients and represents a significant public health problem in both developed and developing countries. Improved functional outcomes after nerve transfers are increasingly reported in the literature, but thus far, no options exist for injuries above the C5 level. Case Description We report the cases of 2 patients with C4 spinal cord injury, American Spinal Injury Association A, who underwent successful bilateral spinal accessory nerve transfers, on 1 side to the triceps nerve with long intervening sural graft and on the other side direct transfer to the motor fascicles of the middle trunk. Patients improved from Medical Research Council 0 to 4 on the side of the nerve graft and 0 to 2 or 3 on the side of the direct transfer. Both patients also underwent transfer of the greater auricular nerve to sensory fascicles of the middle trunk, and they experienced sensory recovery in the C6 distribution. Notably, both patients were far removed from the traditional window of nerve transfer surgery at 4 years and almost 11 years out from injury. Conclusions We describe 2 successful cases of the first and to date only option for motor and sensory reinnervation in high cervical spinal cord injuries. These procedures provide a robust nerve transfer option capable of improving quality of life in tetraplegic patients. There may be a significant undertreated population of patients with cervical spinal cord injury patients in the United States who were previously considered outside the window for benefiting from nerve transfers but who would benefit from these techniques.