Search

Purpose Interprofessional education (IPE) is gaining recognition as a means of improving health care delivery and patient outcomes. A primary goal of IPE is improved interprofessional collaboration (IPC). The multidisciplinary team in the radiation oncology clinic requires effective IPC for optimal delivery of radiation therapy. However, there are limited data on IPE and IPC in radiation oncology. This qualitative study aims to characterize IPC in radiation oncology. Methods and Materials Semistructured phone interviews were performed from June to August 2019 with radiation oncologists, nurses, dosimetrists, radiation therapists, medical physicists, and medical students across a single academic medical center and affiliated network sites. Interviews were recorded, de-identified, and transcribed verbatim. Resulting transcripts were analyzed using thematic analysis. Results Seventeen interviews were performed with 4 radiation oncologists, 2 nurses, 2 dosimetrists, 4 radiation therapists, 2 medical physicists, and 3 medical students. Thematic analysis identified 4 themes: (1) management of the radiation oncology clinic, (2) potential impact of interprofessional training in radiation oncology, (3) current climate of interprofessional education in radiation oncology, and (4) creating an interprofessional training program in radiation oncology. Each theme elicited between 2 and 7 subthemes. Conclusions From the analytical themes that emerged, it is hypothesized that misunderstanding professionals’ roles can lead to communication breakdown, which creates less efficient clinic management and disorganized patient care. Although other medical professionals shadow physicians during their training, physicians are not learning about other professions in the same way. Interviewees from each professional category recommend a formal shadowing program for radiation oncology trainees at the medical student or resident level. Having structured opportunities for IPE is important given competing demands of learners during medical student rotations and residency. This study suggests an unmet need for exposure of radiation oncology medical trainees to IPE with the ultimate goal of improving IPC in the radiation oncology clinic.

Background Physician gender differences exist for estimating surgical risk and recommending lung resection. This study assessed gender differences in perceived importance of health characteristics portrayed by standardized patients posing as lung resection candidates. Methods Physicians read a clinical vignette categorized as low, average, or high surgical risk and then viewed a video of a standardized patient exhibiting vigorous, normal, or frail behavior. The relative importance of gait speed, strength, fatigue, age, and weight loss in the videos was scored on a five-point Likert-like scale. Ratings of the importance of each were compared by gender and risk category. Results Of 73 participating physicians, 62 were male and 11 were female, 40 were thoracic surgeons, and 33 were cardiothoracic surgical trainees. All video features were scored as very important or somewhat important a majority of the time. Gait speed and strength ratings were strongly correlated (r = 0.76), followed by strength and fatigue (r = 0.52) and gait speed and fatigue (r = 0.51). Female gender was associated with significantly greater odds of rating age as very important (p = 0.040). For weight loss, the differences between genders varied significantly (females consistently rated weight loss as important, whereas ratings for men varied by risk category; p = 0.002 for the interaction). Conclusions Physicians variably rate certain health characteristics of standardized patients as important in making surgical risk estimations. Women and men rate the importance of age and weight loss differently. These findings may help educate physicians to develop more consistent estimates of surgical risk.

BACKGROUND. Clinical vignettes are frequently used as instructional and evaluative instruments for physicians. Physicians’ gender is a source of unconscious bias in treatment recommendations. This study assessed whether interpretation of information in clinical vignettes differed by physicians’ gender as a possible source of unconscious bias. METHODS. Thoracic surgeons and physicians in cardiothoracic surgical training were asked to provide estimates of major complication rates for lung resection on the basis of anonymized clinical vignettes of patients undergoing lung resection. Vignettes were categorized as low, average, and high risk by using a sum of Charlson Comorbidity Index (possible range, 0 to 37) and a combined physiologic score, EVAD (forced expiratory volume in 1 second, diffusing capacity of lung for carbon monoxide, age; possible range, 0 to 12); participants were not aware of the risk scores or vignette categories. Generalized estimating equation linear regression models were fit with risk scores treated as a continuous independent variable. RESULTS. A total of 247 physicians (105 practicing surgeons, 142 trainees; 203 men, 44 women) participated in one or more of the studies. Nearly all (103; 98%) of the practicing surgeons rated themselves as competent or expert in lung resection compared with 77 (54%) of the trainees (p < 0.001). Participants’ complication estimates mirrored both vignette risk category and combined risk score. There was no significant difference between men and women physicians in their estimates of complication rates. CONCLUSIONS. Unconscious bias related to physicians’ gender is not associated with differential use of information in clinical vignettes. Any possible bias may arise from face-to-face interactions with patients. Research into physicians’ and patients’ gender differences during such interactions is warranted.

Electronic Health Record (EHR) use can enhance or weaken patient-provider communication. Despite EHR adoption, no validated tool exists to assess EHR communication skills. We aimed to develop and validate such a tool.Electronic-Clinical Evaluation Exercise (e-CEX) is a 10-item-tool based on systematic literature review and pilot-testing. Second-year (MS2s) students participated in an EHR-use lecture and structured Clinical Examination (OSCE). Untrained third-year students (MS3s) participated in the same OSCE. OSCEs were scored with e-CEX compared to a standardized patient (SP) tool. Internal consistency, discriminant validity, and concurrent validity were analyzed.Three investigators used e-CEX to rate 70 videos (20 MS2, 50 MS3). Reliability testing indicated high internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha=0.89). MS2s scored significantly higher than untrained MS3s on e-CEX [e-CEX 55(10.7) vs. 44.9 (12.7), P=0.003], providing evidence of discriminant validity. e-CEX and SP score correlation was high (Pearson correlation=0.74, P0.001), providing concurrent validity evidence. Item reduction suggested a three-item tool had similar explanatory power (R-squared=0.85 vs 0.86).e-CEX is a reliable, valid tool to assess medical student patient-centered EHR communication skills.While validation is needed with other healthcare providers, e-CEX may help improve provider behaviors and enhance patients' overall experience of EHR use in their care.

Background Most hospitalized patients with asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease misuse respiratory inhalers. An in-person educational strategy, teach-to-goal (TTG), improves inpatients' inhaler technique. Objective To develop an effective, portable education intervention that remains accessible to hospitalized patients postdischarge for reinforcement of proper inhaler technique. Methods A mixed methods approach at an urban academic hospital was used to iteratively develop, modify, and test a virtual teach-to-goal™ (V-TTG™) educational intervention using patient end-user feedback. A survey examined access and willingness to use technology for self-management education. Focus groups evaluated patients' feedback on access, functionality, and quality of V-TTG™. Results Forty-eight participants completed the survey, with most reporting having Internet access; 77% used the Internet at home and 82% used the Internet at least once every few weeks. More than 80% reported that they were somewhat or very likely to use V-TTG™ to gain skills to improve their health. Most participants reported smartphone access (73%); half owned laptop computers (52%). Participants with asthma versus chronic obstructive pulmonary disease were more likely to own a smartphone, have a data plan, and have daily Internet use (P Conclusions V-TTG™ is a promising educational tool for improving patients' inhaler technique, iteratively developed and refined with patient input. Patients in our urban, academic hospital overwhelmingly reported access to platforms and willingness to use V-TTG™ for health education.

Physicians are only moderately accurate in estimating surgical risk based on clinical vignettes. We assessed the impact of perceived frailty by measuring the influence of a short video of a standardized patient on surgical risk estimates.Thoracic surgeons and cardiothoracic trainees estimated the risk of major complications for lobectomy based on clinical vignettes of varied risk categories (low, average, high). After each vignette, subjects viewed a randomly selected video of a standardized patient exhibiting either vigorous or frail behavior, then reestimated risk. Subjects were asked to rate 5 vignettes paired with 5 different standardized patients.Seventy-one physicians participated. Initial risk estimates varied according to the vignette risk category: low 15.2%±11.2% risk; average 23.7%±16.1%; high 37.3%±18.9% (p0.001 by analysis of variance). Concordant information in vignettes and videos moderately altered estimates (high risk vignette, frail video 10.6%±27.5% increase in estimate, p=0.006; low risk vignette, vigorous video 14.5%±45.0% decrease, p=0.009). Discordant findings influenced risk estimates more substantially (high risk vignette, vigorous video 21.2%±23.5% decrease in second risk estimate, p0.001; low risk vignette, frail video 151.9%±209.8% increase, p0.001).Surgeons differentiated relative risk of lobectomy based on clinical vignettes. The effect of viewing videos was small when vignettes and videos were concordant; the effect was more substantial when vignettes and videos were discordant. The information will be helpful in training future surgeons in frailty recognition and risk estimation.