Search

Recent data have demonstrated that overall mortality and adverse events are not significantly different for primary repair (PR) and staged repair (SR) approaches to management of neonates with symptomatic tetralogy of Fallot (sTOF). Cost data can be used to compare the relative value (cost for similar outcomes) of these approaches and are a potentially more sensitive measure of morbidity.This study sought to compare the economic costs associated with PR and SR in neonates with sTOF.Data from a multicenter retrospective cohort study of neonates with sTOF were merged with administrative data to compare total costs and cost per day alive over the first 18 months of life in a propensity score-adjusted analysis. A secondary analysis evaluated differences in department-level costs.In total, 324 subjects from 6 centers from January 2011 to November 2017 were studied (40% PR). The 18-month cumulative mortality (P = 0.18), procedural complications (P = 0.10), hospital complications (P = 0.94), and reinterventions (P = 0.22) did not differ between PR and SR. Total 18-month costs for PR (median $179,494 [IQR: $121,760-$310,721]) were less than for SR (median: $222,799 [IQR: $167,581-$327,113]) (P 0.001). Cost per day alive (P = 0.005) and department-level costs were also all lower for PR. In propensity score-adjusted analyses, PR was associated with lower total cost (cost ratio: 0.73; P 0.001) and lower department-level costs.In this multicenter study of neonates with sTOF, PR was associated with lower costs. Given similar overall mortality between treatment strategies, this finding suggests that PR provides superior value.

To evaluate early growth following primary or staged repair of neonatal symptomatic tetralogy of Fallot (sTOF).We performed a retrospective, multicenter cohort study of consecutive infants with sTOF who underwent initial intervention at age ≤30 days, from 2005 to 2017. Management strategies were either primary repair or staged repair (ie, initial palliation followed by complete repair). The primary outcome was change in weight-for-age z-score (ΔWAZ) from the initial intervention to age 6 ± 2 months. Secondary outcomes included method and mode of feeding, feeding-related medications, and feeding-related readmissions. Propensity score adjustment was used to account for baseline differences between groups. A secondary analysis was performed comparing patients stratified by the presence of adequate growth (6-month ΔWAZ -0.5) or inadequate growth (6-month ΔWAZ ≤ -0.5), independent of treatment strategy.The study cohort included 143 primary repair subjects and 240 staged repair subjects. Prematurity was more common in the staged repair group. After adjustment, median ΔWAZ did not differ between treatment groups over the first 6 months of life (primary: -0.43 [IQR, -1.17 to 0.50]; staged: -0.31 [IQR, -1.31 to 0.71]; P = .55). For the entire cohort, ΔWAZ was negative (-0.36; IQR, -1.21 to 0.63). There were no between-group differences in the secondary outcomes. Secondary analysis revealed that the subjects with adequate growth were more likely to be orally fed at initial hospital discharge (P = .04).In neonates with sTOF, growth trajectory over the first 6 months of life was substandard, irrespective of treatment strategy. Those patients with adequate growth were more likely to be discharged from the index procedure on oral feeds.