1. Radiation and contrast agent doses reductions by using 80-kV tube voltage in coronary computed tomographic angiography: A comparative study
- Author
-
Peng Wang, Yu Zhang, Jian-xin Cao, Jin-guo Lu, Yi-min Wang, and Cheng Yang
- Subjects
Adult ,Male ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Image quality ,Iohexol ,Contrast Media ,Coronary Artery Disease ,Coronary Angiography ,Radiation Dosage ,Body weight ,Sensitivity and Specificity ,Effective dose (radiation) ,Radiation Protection ,medicine ,Humans ,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging ,In patient ,Aged ,Aged, 80 and over ,Dose-Response Relationship, Drug ,business.industry ,Radiation dose ,Reproducibility of Results ,Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation ,General Medicine ,Middle Aged ,Radiographic Image Enhancement ,Computed tomographic angiography ,medicine.anatomical_structure ,Female ,Radiology ,Tomography, X-Ray Computed ,Nuclear medicine ,business ,Body mass index ,Artery - Abstract
To investigate the effects of 80-kilovoltage (kV) tube voltage coronary computed tomographic angiography (CCTA) with a reduced amount of contrast agent on qualitative and quantitative image quality parameters and on radiation dose in patients with a body mass index (BMI)23.0 kg/m(2).One hundred and twenty consecutive patients with a BMI23.0 kg/m(2) and a low calcium load undergoing retrospective electrocardiogram (ECG)-gated dual-source CCTA were randomized into two groups [standard-tube voltage (120-kV) vs. low-tube voltage (80-kV)]. The injection flow rate of contrast agent (350 mg I/mL) was adjusted to body weight of each patient (4.5-5.5 mL/s in the 120-kV group and 2.8-3.8 mL/s in the 80-kV group). Radiation and contrast agent doses were evaluated. Quantitative image quality parameters and figure of merit (FOM) of coronary artery were evaluated. Each coronary segment was evaluated for image quality on a 4-point scale.Compared with the 120-kV group, effective dose and amount of contrast agent in the 80-kV group were decreased by 57.8% and 30.5% (effective dose:2.7 ± 0.5 vs. 6.4 ± 1.3 mSv; amount of contrast agent:57.1 ± 3.2 vs. 82.1 ± 6.1 mL; both p0.0001), respectively. Image noise was 22.7 ± 2.1HU for 120-kV images and 33.2 ± 5.2 HU for 80-kV images (p0.0001). Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) in the proximal right coronary artery (RCA) and left main coronary artery (LMA) were all lower in 80-kV than 120-kV images (SNR in the proximal RCA: 16.5 ± 1.8 vs. 19.4 ± 2.8; SNR in the LMA: 16.3 ± 2.0 vs.19.6 ± 2.7; CNR in the proximal RCA: 19.4 ± 2.3 vs.22.9 ± 3.0; CNR in the LMA: 18.8 ± 2.4 vs. 22.7 ± 2.9; all p0.0001). FOM were all significantly higher in 80-kV than 120-kV images (proximal RCA: 146.7 ± 45.1 vs. 93.4 ± 32.0; LMA: 139.1 ± 47.2 vs. 91.6 ± 31.1; all p0.0001). There was no significant difference in image quality score between the two groups (3.3 ± 0.8 vs. 3.3 ± 0.8, p=0.068) despite decreased SNR and CNR of coronary artery in the 80-kV group.The 80-kV protocol significantly reduces radiation and contrast agent doses in CCTA in patients with a low BMI23.0 kg/m(2) and a low calcium load while maintaining image quality.
- Published
- 2014
- Full Text
- View/download PDF