Search

Genome sequencing (GS) can aid clinical management of multiple pediatric conditions. Insurers require accurate cost information to inform funding and implementation decisions. The objective was to compare the laboratory workflows and microcosts of trio GS testing in children with developmental delay (DD) and in children with cardiac conditions.Cost items related to each step in trio GS (child and 2 parents) for both populations were identified and measured. Program costs over 5 years were estimated. Probabilistic and deterministic analyses were conducted.The mean cost per trio GS was CAD$6634.11 (95% CI = 6352.29-6913.40) for DD and CAD$8053.10 (95% CI = 7699.30-8558.10) for cardiac conditions. The 5-year program cost was CAD$28.11 million (95% CI = 26.91-29.29) for DD and CAD$5.63 million (95% CI = 5.38-5.98) for cardiac conditions. Supplies constituted the largest cost component for both populations. The higher cost per sample for the population with cardiac conditions was due to the inclusion of pharmacogenomics, higher bioinformatics labor costs, and a more labor intensive case review.This analysis indicated important variation in trio GS workflow and costs between pediatric populations in a single institution. Enhanced understanding of the clinical utility and costs of GS can inform harmonization and implementation decision-making.

The effectiveness of behaviorally informed, targeted invitations to standard invitations and to no invitation (control arm, primary analysis) were compared in the context of an organized colorectal cancer (CRC) screening program. Two multi-arm, pragmatic randomized controlled trials in men (arms: male-specific, unisex, standard invitation, or no invitation) and in women (arms: unisex, standard invitation, or no invitation), were conducted in Ontario, Canada. Eligible persons aged 50-74, due for CRC screening, were randomized. Primary and secondary outcomes were completion of the guaiac fecal occult blood test (gFOBT) and uptake of any colorectal test, respectively, within 5 months of mailing. Impact of invitation type was assessed using logistic regression. Letters were mailed to 75,810 men and women; 38,673 males and 34,453 females were included in the analyses. Men who received the male-specific letter were most likely to screen with gFOBT compared to controls (odds ratio (OR) 7·24, 95% CI: 5·77, 9·09), followed by those receiving the unisex letter (OR 6·75, 95% CI: 5·37, 8·47) and the standard letter (OR 5·99, 95% CI: 4·76, 7·53). Women who received the unisex letter were most likely to be screened with gFOBT compared to controls (OR 7·07, 95% CI: 5·83, 8·59), followed by those receiving the standard letter (OR 6·76, 95% CI: 5·56, 8·21). In both trials, the findings were similar for the secondary outcome. Mailed invitations were effective for both men and women. With greater targeting using the behaviorally informed invitations, the magnitude of benefit relative to no invitation appeared to increase. (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02364895).

PurposeWhole-exome (WES) and whole-genome sequencing (WGS) increase the diagnostic yield in autism spectrum disorder (ASD) compared to chromosomal microarray (CMA), but there have been no comprehensive cost analyses. The objective was to perform such an assessment of CMA, WES, and WGS and compare the incremental cost per additional positive finding in hypothetical testing scenarios.MethodsFive-year patient and program costs were estimated from an institutional perspective. WES and WGS estimates were based on HiSeq 2500 with an additional WGS estimate for HiSeq X platforms. Parameter uncertainty was assessed with probabilistic and deterministic sensitivity analysis.ResultsThe cost per ASD sample was CAD$1,655 (95% CI: 1,611; 1,699) for WES, CAD$2,851 (95% CI: 2,750; 2,956) for WGS on HiSeq X, and CAD$5,519 (95% CI: 5,244; 5,785) on HiSeq 2500, compared to CAD$744 (95% CI 714, 773) for CMA. The incremental cost was over CAD$25,000 per additional positive finding if CMA was replaced by newer technology.ConclusionWhile costs for WES and WGS remain high, future reductions in material and equipment costs, and increased understanding of newly discovered variants and variants of unknown significance will lead to improved value.

Objective It is key for women to return to screening at regular intervals to ensure the effectiveness of early detection and protective effects of the Pap test. A correspondence program was initiated in Ontario in 2013 to implement a recall and reminder letter sent to women 2.9 years from their prior normal Pap test. This study sought to evaluate the impact of the recall letter and reminder on retention rates for cervical screening. Methods A cohort study with a historical control was carried out with an exposed group, defined as women receiving a letter for recall in the week of November 21–27, 2013, and a non-exposed, control arm of women who did not receive the letter but who would have been eligible for correspondence in the same time period in 2012. Results The study population comprised 5182 women in the exposed group and 4223 women in the non-exposed group. Women receiving the letter were more likely to return to screening, with an aOR of 1.82 (95% CI 1.66–1.99). Other significant factors included being registered with a Patient Enrolment Model family physician and having a series of prior Pap tests in the past screening history. Conclusion A correspondence program benefits the retention of women in organized cervical screening programs.