Search

Background: Tourette syndrome (TS) is a childhood-onset neurodevelopmental disorder of complex genetic architecture and is characterized by multiple motor tics and at least one vocal tic persisting for more than 1 year. Methods: We performed a genome-wide meta-analysis integrating a novel TS cohort with previously published data, resulting in a sample size of 6133 individuals with TS and 13,565 ancestry-matched control participants. Results: We identified a genome-wide significant locus on chromosome 5q15. Integration of expression quantitative trait locus, Hi-C (high-throughput chromosome conformation capture), and genome-wide association study data implicated the NR2F1 gene and associated long noncoding RNAs within the 5q15 locus. Heritability partitioning identified statistically significant enrichment in brain tissue histone marks, while polygenic risk scoring of brain volume data identified statistically significant associations with right and left thalamus volumes and right putamen volume. Conclusions: Our work presents novel insights into the neurobiology of TS, thereby opening up new directions for future studies.

Research indicates that soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase 1 (sFLT-1) and placental growth factor (PLGF) have diagnostic and prognostic significance for women with preeclampsia. However, sparse research has studied these biomarkers in women with preexisting comorbidities such as chronic hypertension, diabetes mellitus, systemic lupus erythematosus and chronic kidney disease. We undertook a prospective longitudinal cohort study to compare the sFLT-1: PlGF ratio between women with and without comorbidities who did and did not go on to develop preeclampsia. We found that women with comorbidities may develop preeclampsia with a milder elevation in sFLT-1: PlGF than do women without comorbidities. This has clinical and research implications.

Summary Background Little evidence is available on the use of telehealth for antenatal care. In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, we developed and implemented a new antenatal care schedule integrating telehealth across all models of pregnancy care. To inform this clinical initiative, we aimed to assess the effectiveness and safety of telehealth in antenatal care. Methods We analysed routinely collected health data on all women giving birth at Monash Health, a large health service in Victoria (Australia), using an interrupted time-series design. We assessed the impact of telehealth integration into antenatal care from March 23, 2020, across low-risk and high-risk care models. Allowing a 1-month implementation period from March 23, 2020, we compared the first 3 months of telehealth integrated care delivered between April 20 and July 26, 2020, with conventional care delivered between Jan 1, 2018, and March 22, 2020. The primary outcomes were detection and outcomes of fetal growth restriction, pre-eclampsia, and gestational diabetes. Secondary outcomes were stillbirth, neonatal intensive care unit admission, and preterm birth (birth before 37 weeks' gestation). Findings Between Jan 1, 2018, and March 22, 2020, 20 031 women gave birth at Monash Health during the conventional care period and 2292 women gave birth during the telehealth integrated care period. Of 20 154 antenatal consultations provided in the integrated care period, 10 731 (53%) were delivered via telehealth. Overall, compared with the conventional care period, no significant differences were identified in the integrated care period with regard to the number of babies with fetal growth restriction (birthweight below the 3rd percentile; 2% in the integrated care period vs 2% in the conventional care period, p=0·72, for low-risk care models; 5% in the integrated care period vs 5% in the conventional care period, p=0·50 for high-risk care models), number of stillbirths (1% vs 1%, p=0·79; 2% vs 2%, p=0·70), or pregnancies complicated by pre-eclampsia (3% vs 3%, p=0·70; 9% vs 7%, p=0·15), or gestational diabetes (22% vs 22%, p=0·89; 30% vs 26%, p=0·06). Interrupted time-series analysis showed a significant reduction in preterm birth among women in high-risk models (–0·68% change in incidence per week [95% CI −1·37 to −0·002]; p=0·049), but no significant differences were identified in other outcome measures for low-risk or high-risk care models after telehealth integration compared with conventional care. Interpretation Telehealth integrated antenatal care enabled the reduction of in-person consultations by 50% without compromising pregnancy outcomes. This care model can help to minimise in-person interactions during the COVID-19 pandemic, but should also be considered in post-pandemic health-care models. Funding None.

Background There are still no sufficient data regarding the use of deep brain stimulation (DBS) in Gilles de la Tourette syndrome (GTS) and no agreement on optimal target. Objective To compare efficacy and safety of bilateral DBS of thalamus (centromedian-ventro-oral internus, CM-Voi) versus posteroventral lateral globus pallidus internus (pvl GPi)) versus sham stimulation, and baseline in severe medically refractory GTS. Methods In this randomized double-blind sham stimulation-controlled trial (RCT), 10 patients (3 women, mean age = 29.4 ± 10.2 SD, range 18–47) underwent three blinded periods each lasting three months including (i) sham, (ii) pvl GPi (on-GPi), and (iii) thalamic stimulation (on-thal) followed by an open uncontrolled long-term follow-up (up to 9 years) with individually determined target and stimulation settings. Results Nine patients completed the RCT. At group level, on-GPi – but not on-thal – resulted in a significant tic reduction compared to baseline, but had no effect on premonitory urges and psychiatric comorbidities. Direct comparisons of targets resulted in inconsistent or negative (compared to sham) findings. During follow-up, we found no improvement of tics, comorbidities, and quality of life at group level, however, single patients benefitted continuously from thalamic DBS. At last follow-up 89.9 months (mean) after surgery, 50% of patients had discontinued DBS. Hardware infections occurred in 3/10 patients. Conclusion Our data suggest that the initial effect of pvl GPi DBS is superior to thalamic (CM-Voi) DBS. While half of the patients discontinued treatment, single patients benefitted from thalamic DBS even after years. It is likely that outcome is influenced by various factors beyond the mere change in tic severity.

Background: Longer gestation at term and post-term age is associated with increased perinatal mortality. Nonetheless, recent neuroimaging studies indicated that longer gestation is also associated with better functioning of the child's brain. Aims: to assess whether longer gestation in term and post-term (in short: term) singletons is associated with better infant neurodevelopment. Study design: cross-sectional observational study. Subjects: Participants were all singleton term infants (n = 1563) aged 2–18 months of the IMP-SINDA project that collected normative data for the Infant Motor Profile (IMP) and Standardized Infant NeuroDevelopmental Assessment (SINDA). The group was representative of the Dutch population. Outcome measures: Total IMP score was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes were atypical total IMP scores (scores

BackgroundCOVID-19 infection in pregnancy is associated with a higher risk of progression to severe disease, but vaccine uptake by pregnant women is hindered by persistent safety concerns. COVID-19 vaccination in pregnancy has been shown to reduce stillbirth, but its relationship with preterm birth is uncertain.ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to investigate the sociodemographic characteristics associated with vaccine uptake in Melbourne, Australia, and to compare perinatal outcomes by vaccination status.Study designRetrospective multicenter cohort study in Melbourne following the national recommendations for mRNA COVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy in June 2021. Routinely collected data from all 12 public maternity hospitals in Melbourne were extracted on births ≥ 20 weeks’ gestation from 1st July 2021 to 31 March 2022. Maternal sociodemographic characteristics were analyzed from the total birth cohort. Perinatal outcomes were compared between vaccinated and unvaccinated women for whom weeks 20-43 of gestation fell entirely within the 9-month data collection period. The primary outcome was the rate of congenital anomaly in singleton infants ≥ 20 weeks’ gestation among women vaccinated during pregnancy. Secondary perinatal outcomes including stillbirth, preterm birth (spontaneous and iatrogenic), birthweight ≤ 3rd centile, and newborn intensive care unit admissions were examined for singleton infants ≥ 24 weeks’ gestation without congenital anomalies. We calculated the adjusted odds ratio of congenital anomalies and perinatal outcomes among vaccinated versus unvaccinated women using inverse propensity score weighting regression adjustment with multiple covariates; p< 0.05 was considered statistically significant.ResultsBirths from 32,536 women were analyzed: 17,365 (53.4%) were vaccinated and 15,171 (47.6%) were unvaccinated. Vaccinated women were significantly more likely to be older, nulliparous, non-smoking, not requiring an interpreter, of higher socioeconomic status, and vaccinated against pertussis and influenza. Vaccination status also varied by region of birth: compared with women born in Australia, women born in South and Eastern Europe, the Middle East, Africa and Oceania had lower adjusted odds of vaccination. There was no significant increase in the rate of congenital anomalies or birth weight ≤ 3rd centile in vaccinated women. Vaccinated women were significantly less like to have an infant with a major congenital anomaly compared with the unvaccinated group (2.4% vs 3.0%, aOR 0.72, 95%CI 0.56-0.94, p=0.02). This finding remained significant even when the analysis was restricted to women vaccinated before 20 weeks’ gestation. Vaccinated women had a significantly lower rate of stillbirth (0.2% vs 0.8%, aOR 0.18, 95%CI 0.09-0.37, P < 0.001. Vaccination was associated with a significant reduction in total preterm births < 37 weeks (5.1% vs 9.2%, aOR 0.60, 95% CI 0.51-0.71, p< 0.001), spontaneous preterm birth (2.4% vs 4.0%, aOR 0.73 95% CI 0.56-0.96, p=0.02) and iatrogenic preterm birth (2.7% vs 5.2%, aOR 0.52, 95%CI 0.41-0.65, p< 0.001).ConclusionsCOVID-19 Vaccine coverage was significantly influenced by known social determinants of health, which is likely to influence the strong association between COVID-19 vaccination and lower risks of stillbirth and preterm birth. We did not observe any adverse impacts of vaccination on fetal growth or development.AT A GLANCEWhy was this study conducted?⍰COVID-19 infection in pregnancy is associated with a higher risk of progression to severe disease, but vaccine uptake by pregnant women is hindered by persistent safety concerns. COVID-19 vaccination in pregnancy has been shown to reduce stillbirth, but its relationship with preterm birth is uncertain.⍰Most of the published literature on COVID-19 vaccination in pregnancy have methodological limitations including fixed cohort bias and time-varying exposure.⍰We conducted this multicenter study to provide robust evidence on mRNA COVID-19 vaccination and perinatal outcomes including congenital anomalies, stillbirth, and preterm birth.What are the key findings?⍰The adjusted odds of stillbirth, preterm birth, and neonatal intensive care admission were significantly reduced among infants born to COVID-19 vaccinated women compared with unvaccinated women. COVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy was not associated with an increase in congenital anomalies.⍰Our results conclusively demonstrate a significant reduction in both spontaneous and iatrogenic preterm birth for vaccinated women⍰Vaccinated women were significantly more likely to be older, nulliparous, non-smoking, not requiring an interpreter, residing in a higher socioeconomic postcode, and vaccinated against pertussis and influenza. There were also significant differences in vaccination rates by region of birth.What does this study add to what is already known?⍰Our analysis confirmed a strong relationship between the COVID-19 mRNA vaccine and lower preterm births and stillbirths⍰In addition to its impact on reducing severe COVID-19 illness, vaccination may be a proxy for other biological and social determinants of health among our pregnant population.

Introduction Placental mitochondrial dysfunction contributes to the oxidative stress that underlies preeclampsia. Here, we assessed whether sulforaphane (SFN) could improve syncytiotrophoblast mitochondrial function after in vitro hypoxic and superoxide injury. Methods Placental cytotrophoblasts were isolated from healthy term placentae (n = 12) and incubated for 48 h in 8% O2 ± 1 μM SFN before acute (4hrs) or chronic (24hrs) hypoxic (1% O2), or superoxide (xanthine/xanthine oxidase) injury. Cytotrophoblasts were also isolated from preeclamptic placentae (n = 5) and cultured in 8% O2 ± 1 μM SFN. Mitochondrial respiration was measured using the Seahorse MitoStress XF assay. Cells were stained with mitotracker red to assess mitochondrial membrane health and mitochondrial gene expression assessed using RT-qPCR. Results SFN prevented significant reductions in syncytiotrophoblast mitochondrial maximal respiration, spare respiratory capacity, basal respiration and ATP production following acute hypoxia. Chronic hypoxia only reduced maximal and spare respiratory capacity. SFN prevented these negative changes and increased respiration overall. Alternatively, acute superoxide injury significantly increased mitochondrial maximal respiration and spare respiratory capacity. SFN treatment further increased basal respiration following superoxide injury and prevented significant decreases in ATP production and coupling efficiency. In preeclamptic placentae, SFN significantly increased mitochondrial maximal respiration, spare respiratory capacity, basal respiration and ATP production, and decreased proton leak. SFN up-regulated mRNA expression of mitochondrial complexes and corrected an up-regulation in fission gene expression observed after hypoxic-superoxide injury. Finally, preliminary results suggest SFN prevented hypoxia-induced impairment of mitochondrial membrane structure. Discussion SFN mitigated hypoxia and superoxide induced changes to syncytiotrophoblast mitochondrial function in vitro, and improved mitochondrial respiration in trophoblast cells from preeclamptic placentae.

Infection during pregnancy can increase the risk of neurodevelopmental disorders in offspring. The impact of maternal SARS-CoV-2 infection on infant neurodevelopment is poorly understood. The maternal immune response to infection may be mimicked in rodent models of maternal immune activation which recapitulate altered neurodevelopment and behavioural disturbances in the offspring. In these models, epigenetic mechanisms, in particular DNA methylation, are one pathway through which this risk is conferredDNA was extracted from buccal swab specimens from (n = 4) SARS-CoV-21962 hypermethylated CpG sites were identified with an unadjusted p-value of 0.05, where 1133 CpGs mapped to 959 unique protein coding genes, and 716 hypomethylated CpG sites mapped to 559 unique protein coding genes in SARS-CoV-2 exposed infants compared to non-exposed. One differentially methylated position (cg06758191), located in the gene body of AFAP1 that was hypomethylated in the SARS-CoV-2 exposed cohort was significant after correction for multiple testing (FDR-adjusted p-value0.00083). Two significant differentially methylated regions were identified; a hypomethylated intergenic region located in chromosome 6p proximal to the genes ZP57 and HLA-F (fwer0.004), and a hypomethylated region in the promoter and body of the gene GAREM2 (fwer0.036). Gene network enrichment analysis revealed differential methylation in genes corresponding to pathways relevant to neurodevelopment, including the ERBB pathway.These pilot data suggest that exposure to SARS-CoV-2

Background Universal screening has been proposed as a strategy to identify asymptomatic individuals infected with the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and mitigate transmission. Aim To investigate the rate of positive tests among pregnant women in Melbourne, Australia. Methods We performed a cross-sectional prevalence study at three maternity hospitals (one tertiary referral hospital and two secondary maternities) in Melbourne, Australia. SARS-CoV-2 testing was offered to all pregnant women attending face-to-face antenatal visits and to those attending the hospital with symptoms of possible coronavirus disease, between 6th and 19th of May 2020. Testing was performed by multiplex-tandem polymerase chain reaction (PCR) on combined oropharyngeal and nasopharyngeal swabs. The primary outcome was the proportion of positive SARS-CoV-2 tests. Findings SARS-CoV-2 testing was performed in 350 women, of whom 19 had symptoms of possible COVID-19. The median maternal age was 32 years (IQR 28–35 years), and the median gestational age at testing was 33 weeks and four days (IQR 28 weeks to 36 weeks and two days). All 350 tests returned negative results (p = 0%, 95% CI 0–1.0%). Conclusion In a two-week period of low disease prevalence, the rate of asymptomatic coronavirus infection among pregnant women in Australia during the study period was negligible, reflecting low levels of community transmission.

The COVID-19 pandemic has been associated with a worsening of perinatal outcomes in many regions around the world. Melbourne, Australia, had one of the longest and most stringent lockdowns worldwide in 2020 while recording only rare instances of COVID-19 infection in pregnant women.This study aimed to compare the stillbirth and preterm birth rates in women who were exposed or unexposed to lockdown restrictions during pregnancy.This was a retrospective, multicenter cohort study of perinatal outcomes in Melbourne before and during the COVID-19 lockdown. The lockdown period was defined as the period from March 23, 2020 to March 14, 2021. Routinely-collected maternity data on singleton pregnancies ≥24 weeks gestation without congenital anomalies were obtained from all the 12 public hospitals in Melbourne. We defined the lockdown-exposed cohort as those women for whom weeks 20 to 40 of gestation occurred during the lockdown and the unexposed control group as women from the corresponding calendar periods 12 and 24 months before. The main outcome measures were stillbirth, preterm birth, fetal growth restriction (birthweightthird centile), and iatrogenic preterm birth for fetal compromise. We performed multivariable logistic regression analysis to compare the odds of stillbirth, preterm birth, fetal growth restriction, and iatrogenic preterm birth for fetal compromise, adjusting for multiple covariates.There were 24,817 births in the exposed group and 50,017 births in the control group. There was a significantly higher risk of preterm stillbirth in the exposed group than the control group (0.26% vs 0.18%; adjusted odds ratio, 1.49; 95% confidence interval, 1.08-2.05; P=.015). There was also a significant reduction in the preterm birth of live infants37 weeks (5.68% vs 6.07%; adjusted odds ratio, 0.93; 95% confidence interval, 0.87-0.99; P=.02), which was largely mediated by a significant reduction in iatrogenic preterm birth (3.01% vs 3.27%; adjusted odds ratio, 0.91; 95% confidence interval, 0.83-0.99; P=.03), including iatrogenic preterm birth for fetal compromise (1.25% vs 1.51%; adjusted odds ratio, 0.82; 95% confidence interval, 0.71-0.93; P=.003). There were also significant reductions in special care nursery admissions during lockdown (11.53% vs 12.51%; adjusted odds ratio, 0.90; 95% confidence interval, 0.86-0.95; P.0001). There was a trend to fewer spontaneous preterm births37 weeks in the exposed group of a similar magnitude to that reported in other countries (2.69% vs 2.82%; adjusted odds ratio, 0.95; 95% confidence interval, 0.87-1.05; P=.32).Lockdown restrictions in Melbourne, Australia were associated with a significant reduction in iatrogenic preterm birth for fetal compromise and a significant increase in preterm stillbirths. This raises concerns that pandemic conditions in 2020 may have led to a failure to identify and appropriately care for pregnant women at an increased risk of antepartum stillbirth. Further research is required to understand the relationship between these 2 findings and to inform our ongoing responses to the pandemic.