Search

Background The use of intracardiac electrograms to guide atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation has yielded conflicting results. Objectives The authors evaluated the usefulness of spatiotemporal dispersion, a visually recognizable electric footprint of AF drivers, for the ablation of all forms of AF. Methods The authors prospectively enrolled 105 patients admitted for AF ablation. AF was sequentially mapped in both atria with a 20-pole PentaRay catheter. The authors tagged and ablated only regions displaying electrogram dispersion during AF. Results were compared to a validation set in which a conventional ablation approach was used (pulmonary vein isolation/stepwise approach). To establish the mechanism underlying spatiotemporal dispersion of AF electrograms, the authors conducted realistic numerical simulations of AF drivers in a 2-dimensional model and optical mapping of ovine atrial scar-related AF. Results Ablation at dispersion areas terminated AF in 95% of the 105 patients. After ablation of 17 ± 10% of the left atrial surface and 18 months of follow-up, the atrial arrhythmia recurrence rate was 15% after 1.4 ± 0.5 procedures per patient versus 41% in the validation set after 1.5 ± 0.5 procedures per patient (arrhythmia free-survival: 85% vs. 59%; log-rank p Conclusions The clustering of intracardiac electrograms exhibiting spatiotemporal dispersion is indicative of AF drivers. Their ablation allows for a nonextensive and patient-tailored approach to AF ablation. (Substrate Ablation Guided by High Density Mapping in Atrial Fibrillation [SUBSTRATE HD]; NCT02093949)

Objectives This study sought to evaluate the impact of a complex fractionated atrial electrogram (CFAE)–guided ablation strategy on atrial fibrillation (AF) dynamics in patients with persistent AF. Background It is still unclear whether complete pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is required or if the ablation of well-delineated pulmonary vein (PV) subregions could achieve similar outcomes in persistent AF. Methods CFAE-guided ablations were performed in 76 patients (65.2 ± 10 years of age) with persistent AF. In 47 patients, we measured mean PVs and left atrial appendage (LAA) cycle length (CL) values (PV-CL and LAA-CL), before ablation and before AF termination. We defined “active” PVs as PV-CL ≤ LAA-CL, “rapid fires” as PV-CL ≤80% of LAA-CL, and “PV-LAA CL gradient” as a significant CL difference between the 2 regions. Results AF termination (sinus rhythm [SR] or atrial tachycardia [AT] conversion) occurred in 92% and SR conversion in 75%. The radiofrequency time for AF termination and total radiofrequency time were 26 ± 25 min and 61.1 ± 21.6 min, respectively. Thirty of 47 patients had active PV (with 19 PV “rapid fires”). Ablation significantly increased median CL, both at PVs and LAA from 188 ms (interquartile range [IQR]: 161 to 210 ms) to 227.5 ms (IQR: 200 to 256 ms) (p Conclusions CFAE-guided ablation leads to a large decrease in PV frequency of activation, preceding AF termination. A PV modulation approach, rather than complete PVI, may be preferable for persistent AF.

The role of pulmonary veins (PVs) in persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) perpetuation appears less important than in paroxysmal AF. Electrogram-based substrate ablation is not widely performed as a stand-alone strategy.To evaluate PV activity in AF perpetuation and efficacy of our patient-tailored ablation strategy (electrogram-based substrate ablation with or without pulmonary vein isolation [PVI]).One hundred twenty-one patients with paroxysmal (n = 19; 15.7%), persistent (n = 77; 63.6%), or long-standing persistent (n = 25; 20.7%) AF underwent electrogram-based substrate ablation with AF termination end point: sinus rhythm or atrial tachycardia conversion. Before ablation, we classified PVs as "passive" if silent PV or if PV cycle length is greater than left atrial appendage cycle length. No PVI was performed in such cases.Passive PVs were observed in 52 of 121 patients (paroxysmal AF = 0%, persistent AF = 40%, and long-standing persistent AF = 76%; P.0001]). Substrate ablation terminated AF in 95.6% (sinus rhythm conversion in 80.2%). Compared with patients with active PVs, patients with passive PVs had longer AF sustained duration (19.1 ± 29.7 months vs 4.9 ± 11.1 months; P.0001), larger left atrial diameter (46.9 ± 7.3 mm vs 41.9 ± 6.0 mm; P = .0014), lower left ventricular ejection fraction (45.4% ± 13.5% vs 55.1% ± 9.4%; P.0001), and more often structural heart disease (57% vs 33%; P = .02). After a follow-up of 20.39 ± 11.23 months (1.6 procedures per patient), 82% were arrhythmia free with this strategy.PV activity during AF decreases with AF chronicity, left atrial dilatation, and left ventricular ejection fraction. Our patient-tailored ablation strategy without systematic PVI provides good results.