Search

For younger women with acute myocardial infarction (AMI), little is known regarding their contemporary care pathways and clinical outcomes.We studied AMI patients aged 18-55 years, hospitalized from April 1, 2009, to March 31, 2019, in Ontario, Canada. We compared trends in comorbidities, angiographic findings, and revascularisation rates in men and women. The primary outcome was 1-year all-cause mortality or readmission for unstable angina, AMI, heart failure, or stroke. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to account for differences in baseline clinical characteristics between men and women.Among the 38,071 AMI patients included, 8,077 (21.2%) were women. Over the study period, women had increasing rates of diabetes (24.8% to 34.9%; PCoronary angiography is performed almost universally in younger women with AMI; however, coronary revascularisation is less frequent, perhaps reflecting less obstructive disease. Although mortality rates after AMI were similar between sexes, cardiovascular readmission rates and all-cause readmissions were significantly increased among women.

Background: In patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), selecting an antithrombotic regimen requires balancing risks of ischemic cardiac events, stroke, and bleeding. Methods: We studied 467 patients with AF undergoing PCI in the time period from December 2015 to July 2018 identified via a chart audit by 47 Canadian cardiologists in the CONNECT AF+PCI (the Coordinated National Network to Engage Interventional Cardiologists in the Antithrombotic Treatment of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention) study, to determine patterns of initial antithrombotic therapy selection. Results: The median (25th, 75th percentile) CHADS2 score was 2 (1, 3), and PCI was performed in the setting of acute coronary syndrome in 62.1%. Triple antithrombotic therapy (TAT) was the initial treatment in 62.7%, dual-pathway therapy in 25.7%, and dual antiplatelet therapy in 11.6%, with a temporal increase in use of dual-pathway therapy during the course of the study; median intended TAT duration was 1 (1, 3) month. Compared with patients selected for TAT, patients selected for dual-pathway therapy were less likely to have prior myocardial infarction (35.8% vs 25.8%, P = 0.045) and prior PCI (33.8% vs 23.3%, P = 0.03), and they received shorter total length of stents (38 [23, 56] vs 30 [20, 46] mm, P = 0.03). Patients selected for dual-pathway therapy had a higher prevalence of prior stroke/transient ischemic attack (13.0% vs 23.3%, P = 0.01). There was no difference in prevalence of anemia (21.5% vs 25.8%, P = 0.30). Use of dual-pathway therapy was similar among patients with acute coronary syndrome and those with stable disease (24.1% vs 28.2%, P = 0.32). Conclusions: Approximately one-quarter of AF patients undergoing PCI are treated with dual-pathway therapy in Canadian practice, with its use increasing during the studied period. Patients selected for dual-pathway therapy have less-complex coronary disease history and intervention. Résumé: Introduction: Les patients atteints de fibrillation auriculaire (FA) qui subissent une intervention coronarienne percutanée (ICP) et choisissent un schéma posologique antithrombotique ont besoin de peser les risques d’événements cardiaques d’origine ischémique, d’accidents vasculaires cérébraux et d’hémorragies. Méthodes: Les 467 patients atteints de FA ayant subi une ICP de décembre 2015 à juillet 2018 qui ont fait l’objet de notre étude ont été trouvés lors de la vérification des dossiers par 47 cardiologues canadiens de l’étude CONNECT AF+PCI (Coordinated National Network to Engage Interventional Cardiologists in the Antithrombotic Treatment of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention) pour déterminer les schémas de sélection du traitement antithrombotique initial. Résultats: Le score CHADS2 médian (25e, 75e percentile) était de 2 (1, 3), et l’ICP avait été réalisée dans le cadre du syndrome coronarien aigu chez 62,1 % des patients. La trithérapie antithrombotique (TTA) était le traitement initial chez 62,7 % des patients, la bithérapie, chez 25,7 % des patients, et la bithérapie antiplaquettaire, chez 11,6 % des patients, mais il y avait une augmentation temporelle dans l’utilisation de la bithérapie durant l’étude; la durée médiane prévue de la TTA était de 1 (1, 3) mois. Comparativement aux patients sélectionnés pour la TTA, les patients sélectionnés pour la bithérapie étaient moins susceptibles d’avoir eu un infarctus du myocarde précédent (35,8 % vs 25,8 %, P = 0,045) et une ICP précédente (33,8 % vs 23,3 %, P = 0,03), et recevaient des endoprothèses de longueur totale plus courte (38 [23, 56] vs 30 [20, 46] mm, P = 0,03). Les patients sélectionnés pour la bithérapie montraient une prévalence plus élevée d’accidents vasculaires cérébraux/accidents ischémiques transitoires (13,0 % vs 23,3 %, P = 0,01). Il n’existait aucune différence dans la prévalence de l’anémie (21,5 % vs 25,8 %, P = 0,30). L’utilisation de la bithérapie était similaire chez les patients atteints d’un syndrome coronarien aigu et chez les patients dont la maladie était stable (24,1 % vs 28,2 %, P = 0,32). Conclusions: Dans la pratique canadienne, environ le quart des patients atteints de FA qui subissent une ICP sont traités par bithérapie, mais durant la période étudiée, son utilisation avait augmenté. Les patients sélectionnés pour la bithérapie ont des antécédents et des interventions liées aux maladies coronariennes moins complexes.

A better understanding of the central role of inflammation in the development of coronary artery disease (CAD) has been the impetus for the evaluation of therapeutic strategies targeting the interleukin-1s/interleukin-6 cytokine signaling pathway, involved in both chronic atherogenesis and in triggering of atherosclerotic plaque rupture. As an inexpensive pharmacologic agent with relatively few adverse effects that tend to be mild and tolerable, the role of colchicine in secondary prevention of atherothrombotic events has been the focus of multiple recent large-scale randomized controlled trials involving patients with stable CAD (Low-Dose Colchicine [LoDoCo] and LoDoCo2 trials), a recent myocardial infarction (Colchicine Cardiovascular Outcome Trial [COLCOT], Colchicine in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome [COPS], and Colchicine and Spironolactone in Patients With Myocardial Infarction/Synergy Stent Registry [CLEAR SYNERGY] trials), and undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions (Colchicine in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention [COLCHICINE-PCI] trial). Based on this evidence, low-dose colchicine (0.5 mg once daily) should be considered in patients with recent myocardial infarctions—within 30 days and, ideally, within 3 days—or with stable CAD to improve cardiovascular outcomes. Colchicine should not be used in patients with severe renal or hepatic disease because of the risk of severe toxicity. No serious adverse effect was associated with the combined use of colchicine and high-intensity statin therapy in large trials. The impact of colchicine in high-risk populations of patients with peripheral arterial disease and in those with diabetes for the primary prevention of CAD remains to be established.

BACKGROUND The Coordinated National Network to Engage Cardiologists in the antithrombotic Treatment of patients with Atrial Fibrillation undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (CONNECT AF+PCI-I) program provided a snapshot (Nov 2015-Jul 2018) of the antithrombotic management of 467 non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients undergoing PCI in Canada (Bagai et al Can J Cardiol 2018;34:S16). Since then, further randomized clinical trials have supported updated Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) AF and Antiplatelet guideline recommendations for antithrombotic strategies for NVAF and coronary artery disease (CAD) patients undergoing PCI and/or medical management. Thus, an updated quality enhancement assessment in Canadian practice (CONNECT AF+PCI-II) was undertaken. METHODS AND RESULTS By retrospective chart audit (Aug 2018-Dec 2020), 68 cardiologists from 8 provinces identified 626 patients with NVAF. 37% had stable CAD, 56% had an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and PCI, and 7% had an ACS and were medically managed. Median age was 76 (25th,75th percentiles 69, 83; 87% ≥65 years); 29% female; 38% diabetes; median CHADS2 score 2 (1, 3); median CHA2DS2-VASc score 4 (3, 5); median HAS-BLED score 3 (2, 3). 73% were receiving oral anticoagulation (OAC) before the index ACS/PCI (apixaban 31%, rivaroxaban 24%, dabigatran 6%, edoxaban 2%, warfarin 10%). Initial antithrombotic therapy after the index ACS/PCI was: 53% triple therapy (OAC+dual antiplatelet therapy [DAPT=ASA+P2Y12 receptor inhibitor], 31% OAC+P2Y12 inhibitor, 9% DAPT, 4% OAC+ASA, 2% OAC alone, and CONCLUSION While triple therapy remains the most common initial antithrombotic strategy used in AF patients undergoing PCI and/or admitted with ACS in Canada, treatment duration has shortened over time. Further, more patients are receiving CCS guideline-recommended OAC+ P2Y12 receptor inhibitor post-PCI compared to previously, and OAC monotherapy 1 year post-ACS/PCI.

Objectives The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy and safety of radial versus femoral access in women undergoing coronary angiography/intervention. Background The risk of bleeding and vascular access site complications are higher in women than in men. Methods In a pre-specified RIVAL (RadIal Vs femorAL access for coronary intervention) subgroup analysis, we compared outcomes in women (n = 1,861) and men (n = 5,160) randomized to radial versus femoral access. Results Overall, women were at higher risk of major vascular complications compared with men (4.7% vs. 1.7%; p Conclusions Women undergoing coronary angiography and PCI have a higher risk of vascular access site complications compared with men, and radial access is an effective method to reduce these complications.

Objectives This study investigated the relationship between time to invasive assessment and outcomes among ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients randomized to early angiography after fibrinolysis. Background The optimal timing of coronary angiography after fibrinolysis and the association with clinical outcomes is uncertain. Methods Patient-level data from 6 randomized trials, with a median time to angiography Results Among 1,238 patients, the median fibrinolysis to angiography time was 165 min, and the median symptom onset to angiography time was 5.33 h. The primary and key secondary endpoints occurred in 5.7% and 4.7%, respectively. These main endpoints did not vary significantly with increasing fibrinolysis to angiography time. Early angiography ( Conclusions Very early angiography ( NCT01014182 )

Current guideline-based recommendations for oral dual-antiplatelet therapy in an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) include the use of newer adenosine diphosphate receptor inhibitor (ADPri) regimens and agents. The Canadian ACS Reflective Program is a multicenter observational quality-enhancement project that compared the use of ADPri therapy in 2 phases (November 2011-March 2013 and April 2013-November 2013) and also compared ADPri use with previous national data from the Canadian Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (2000-2008). Of 3099 patients with ACS, 30.6% had ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), 52.3% had non-STEMI, and 17% had unstable angina. There was high use of dual-antiplatelet therapy for ≤ 24 hours, with important increases noted when compared with previous national experience (P for trend, < 0.0001). Clopidogrel was the most commonly used ADPri (82.2%), with lower use of the newer agents ticagrelor (9.0%) and prasugrel (3.1%). Ticagrelor and prasugrel use was most frequent in patients with STEMI undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention PCI (34.3%). There was relatively lower use of ADPri therapy at discharge; it was given mainly to patients who did not undergo PCI (68.2%) and to those with non-ST-elevation ACS (82%). When comparing the 2 consecutive phases of data collection in the ACS Reflective, there was an approximate 3- and 2-fold increase in the early and discharge use of the newer ADPri agents, respectively. In conclusion, there has been a temporal increase in ADPri use compared with previous national experience and an increased uptake of newer ADPri agents. Additional work is needed to identify and address barriers limiting optimal implementation of these newer guideline-recommended agents into routine Canadian practice.

A 65-year-old woman underwent double-vessel percutaneous coronary intervention via the right radial artery and received aspirin, ticagrelor (180 mg), and unfractionated heparin. Patent hemostasis was achieved with the Bengal Radial Compression Band, and the patient was transitioned to clopidogrel (

Concerns regarding radiation exposure and its effects during pregnancy are often quoted as an important barrier preventing many women from pursuing a career in Interventional Cardiology. Finding the true risk of radiation exposure from performing cardiac catheterisation procedures can be challenging and guidelines for pregnancy exposure have been inadequate. The Women in Innovations group of Cardiologists with endorsement of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions aim to provide guidance in this publication by describing the risk of radiation exposure to pregnant physicians and cardiac catheterisation personnel, to educate on appropriate radiation monitoring and to encourage mechanisms to reduce radiation exposure. Current data do not suggest a significant increased risk to the foetus of pregnant women in the cardiac catheterisation laboratory and thus do not justify precluding pregnant physicians from performing procedures in the cardiac catheterisation laboratory. However, radiation exposure amongst pregnant physicians should be properly monitored and adequate radiation safety measures are still warranted.

Aunque la enfermedad cardiovascular es la principal causa de mortalidad en las mujeres, los estudios existentes indican que con frecuencia es infradiagnosticada. Ademas, es motivo de especial preocupacion el tratamiento aparentemente suboptimo que reciben las mujeres en comparacion con los varones, con un menor uso de revascularizaciones y de medicaciones basadas en la evidencia. El grupo de especialistas en cardiologia Women in Innovations tiene como objetivo poner de relieve estos problemas y modificar las percepciones existentes, con objeto de optimizar el tratamiento de las mujeres con enfermedad cardiovascular, respaldar la investigacion futura y alentar y orientar la formacion de mujeres como cardiologas intervencionistas.

Myocardial ischemic injury complicating acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and coronary revascularization procedures remains an unresolved clinical dilemma. In preclinical studies, treatment with pyridoxal-5′-phosphate monohydrate (MC-1), a vitamin B6 metabolite, has demonstrated cardioprotective effects. Sixty patients scheduled for elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) who had clinically high-risk characteristics for ischemic complications were randomized to treatment with MC-1 or placebo in a 2:1 double-blinded fashion. The primary end point was defined as infarct size as measured by area under the curve creatine kinase MB (CK-MB) enzymes. Secondary end points included periprocedural ischemia as assessed by continuous electrocardiographic monitoring, 30-day major adverse cardiac events, and net clinical safety, which included liver function testing. The primary end point, median periprocedural CK-MB area under the curve, was reduced from 32.9 ng/ml in the placebo group to 18.6 ng/ml with MC-1 treatment (p = 0.038), reflecting a shift in the distribution of CK-MB. By categorical classification, the occurrence of 30-day nonfatal AMI did not differ between groups. There were no deaths, and 30-day composite adverse event rates were similar (17.9% MC-1 vs 15.0% placebo, p = 1.0). There were no significant differences in ischemia parameters per continuous electrocardiographic monitoring, and no safety issues were identified. In this phase II pilot study, treatment of high-risk patients who underwent PCI with MC-1 was associated with a decrease in the total amount of CK-MB released after PCI. These results support the evaluation of MC-1 in pivotal trials of patients at risk for developing myocardial ischemia, infarction, or reperfusion injury.

Objectives The study was done to determine whether eptifibatide, a platelet glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa antagonist, prevents ischemic complications following percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs) in women as well as in men. Background Eptifibatide reduces ischemic complications after nonurgent coronary stent interventions. Methods We compared outcomes in women (n = 562) and men (n = 1,502) enrolled in the Enhanced Suppression of the Platelet GP IIb/IIIa Receptor with Integrilin Therapy (ESPRIT) trial of double-bolus eptifibatide during PCI. Results Women in the ESPRIT trial were older, and more frequently had hypertension, diabetes mellitus, or acute coronary syndromes, but were less likely to have prior PCI or coronary artery bypass graft surgery. The primary end point, a composite at 48 h of death, myocardial infarction (MI), urgent target vessel revascularization (TVR), and unplanned GP IIb/IIIa use, occurred in 10.5% of women and 7.9% of men (p = 0.082). The composite of death, MI, or TVR after one year occurred in 24.5% of women compared with 18% of men (p = 0.0008). At 48 h, eptifibatide reduced the composite of death, MI, and TVR from 14.5% to 6.0% in women versus 9.0% to 6.8% in men. At one year, these differences persisted: 28.9% versus 20.0% for women and 19.5% versus 16.6% for men. No statistical interaction existed between treatment and gender at either 48 h (p = 0.063) or one year (p = 0.2). Bleeding occurred more commonly in women (5.5% vs. 2.6%, p = 0.002), and was more common in eptifibatide-treated women. After adjustment for age, weight, and hypertension, no interaction between treatment and gender was present. Conclusions Eptifibatide is effective to prevent ischemic complications of PCI in women and may eliminate gender-related differences in PCI outcomes.

For patients undergoing nonurgent coronary stent implantation, blockade of the glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor with eptifibatide reduces the incidence of ischemic complications. We evaluated the interaction of eptifibatide with diabetes in patients who underwent this procedure by analyzing the 1-year outcomes of those enrolled in the Enhanced Suppression of the Platelet IIb/IIIa Receptor with Integrilin Therapy (ESPRIT) trial (466 diabetic and 1,595 nondiabetic patients). At 1 year, the composite end point of death, myocardial infarction (MI), or target vessel revascuarlization (TVR) was higher in diabetic patients (24.5% vs 18.4%; p = 0.008). At 1 year, eptifibatide had a similar effect on the composite end point of death, MI, or TVR in diabetic (hazards ratio [HR] 0.71, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.49 to 1.04) and nondiabetic patients (HR 0.80, 95% CI 0.63 to 0.99). A similar treatment effect was also seen on death or MI in both groups. The 1-year mortality rate for diabetic patients assigned to placebo was 3.5% versus 1.3% for patients receiving eptifibatide (HR 0.37, 95% CI 0.10 to 1.41); the latter rate was similar to the mortality rate of 1.4% for nondiabetic patients in the eptifibatide group. However, eptifibatide did not have a significant effect on TVR in diabetic patients (HR 0.90, 95% CI 0.57 to 1.41). Our data suggest that treatment with eptifibatide is associated with a similar relative reduction in adverse ischemic complications in diabetic and nondiabetic patients undergoing coronary stent implantation. There is no evidence of a statistical interaction in the treatment effect of eptifibatide between patients with and without diabetes.

Background The platelet function analyzer PFA-100 (Dade Behring, Miami, Fla) evaluates platelet function by determining the time to occlusion of an aperture in a membrane coated with collagen and adenosine diphosphate or epinephrine as whole blood flows under shear stress conditions. Platelet aggregation causes aperture occlusion, and results are reported as closure time (CT). Interindividual variability is observed in the level of platelet inhibition achieved with use of the current abciximab dosing regimen (0.25-mg/kg bolus + 10-μg/min infusion for 12 hours). The relationships between specific levels of platelet inhibition and clinical efficacy and safety have not been fully established. Methods and Results We prospectively studied platelet function in 27 patients receiving abciximab during percutaneous coronary intervention. This evaluation included determinations of platelet-rich plasma aggregometry, receptor occupancy studies (D3 assay), and CT measurements at baseline and 10 minutes, 4 hours, 12 hours, and 24 hours after the bolus. All patients received abciximab, aspirin, and heparin; patients undergoing coronary stent implantation received aspirin and ticlopidine after the procedure. CT results were reported within 10 minutes after initiation of testing. For 96% of patients, CT was 300 seconds (maximum CT) immediately after abciximab bolus and remained so throughout the infusion. At 24 hours we observed variable recovery from platelet inhibition and in 72% of patients CT returned to normal (≤130 seconds). Conclusions Findings with the PFA-100 were similar to results observed with platelet aggregometry and receptor occupancy measurements. Most patients treated with abciximab exhibit normalized platelet function at 24 hours despite moderate levels of receptor occupancy, suggesting dissociation between occupancy and function. (Am Heart J 2001;141:226-33.)

Platelet glycoprotein (GP) IIb-IIIa receptor antagonists are being used with increasing frequency in the settings of percutaneous coronary interventions and acute ischemic syndromes. The development of thrombocytopenia after GP IIb-IIIa blockade has been observed to some extent with all parenteral GP IIb-IIIa inhibitors studied to date and could potentially limit their effectiveness. The incidence and severity of thrombocytopenia has varied in large clinical trials with GP IIb-IIIa inhibitors, presumably as a consequence of the different structural and pharmacokinetic characteristics of the agents, the dose administered and duration of use, repetition of exposure, and the various drugs coadministered with these agents. Certain baseline characteristics may be predictive. In most cases, severe thrombocytopenia associated with the use of GP IIb-IIIa receptor antagonists was readily reversible with platelet transfusion and was not usually associated with major clinical sequelae. Although the exact mechanisms responsible for thrombocytopenia after GP IIb-IIIa blockade are poorly understood, an immune mechanism is suggested in which the binding of the antagonist to GP IIb-IIIa receptors leads to the exposure of ligand-induced binding sites recognized by preexisting or induced antibodies. Alternatively, the receptor-drug metabolite complex itself may induce an immune response. All patients receiving parenteral GP IIb-IIIa inhibitors should be monitored within 24 hours of initiation of therapy for the development of thrombocytopenia. An algorithm for the detection and management of thrombocytopenia after GP IIb-IIIa inhibitor therapy is proposed.

Background Patients who continue to smoke after an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) have a significantly increased risk of reinfarction and death compared with those who quit. Varenicline is a first-line smoking cessation therapy with proven efficacy in the general population. However, its efficacy and safety immediately after an ACS are unknown. Methods The EVITA trial is a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial (NCT00794573). The primary objective is to evaluate the efficacy of varenicline after ACS in achieving biochemically validated smoking abstinence at 24 weeks. The secondary objectives are to examine the efficacy of varenicline for smoking abstinence and reduction in daily cigarette consumption at 52 weeks and to describe the occurrence of adverse events. Three hundred and two patients motivated to quit smoking were enrolled in the United States and Canada from November 2009 to December 2014 while hospitalized with an ACS. These participants were randomized (1:1) to either varenicline (1.0 mg twice daily) or placebo for 12 weeks. The trial includes follow-ups by telephone at weeks 1, 2, and 8 and clinic visits at weeks 4, 12, 24, and 52. Data collected include demographic and clinical characteristics, self-reported smoking, exhaled carbon monoxide (an indicator of current smoking), and adverse events. Conclusion The EVITA trial will provide novel information concerning the efficacy and safety of varenicline immediately after ACS. If varenicline is efficacious in this population, it will have a major impact on secondary prevention of recurrent clinical events in patients post-ACS.