1. The precision and accuracy of templating the size of unicondylar knee arthroplasty
- Author
-
Ata G. Kasis, Munthir J. Farhan, Ricardo J. Pacheco, Ahmad M. Ali, David M. Smith, and Waleed Hekal
- Subjects
musculoskeletal diseases ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Accuracy and precision ,Joint arthroplasty ,Osteoarthritis ,Prosthesis Design ,Implant size ,Preoperative Care ,medicine ,Humans ,Knee ,Orthopedics and Sports Medicine ,Femur ,Tibia ,Unicondylar Knee Arthroplasty ,Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee ,Observer Variation ,Orthodontics ,Reproducibility ,business.industry ,Reproducibility of Results ,Osteoarthritis, Knee ,medicine.disease ,Surgery ,Radiography ,Knee Prosthesis ,business - Abstract
In trauma and joint arthroplasty, preoperative templating is an important step that can help in the selection of implant size, position and alignment. Although the precision (reproducibility) of templating in unicondylar knee arthroplasty has been assessed previously, the accuracy has never been studied. Our aim is to assess the precision and accuracy of using the templating system for one commonly used unicondylar knee arthroplasty, ALPHANORM® design (Alphanorm Medizintechnik, Germany). Eight observers used the templating system to estimate the size of the unicondylar knee prosthesis ALPHANORM® in 29 randomly selected patients with osteoarthritis. The observers, who all were orthopaedic surgeons with two different levels of experience, worked independently and repeated their measurements 2 weeks later. All the patients subsequently underwent unicondylar knee replacements, and the actual size of the femur and tibia was assessed intra-operatively without any knowledge of the template sizes. Our results revealed a high level of intra-observer reproducibility. However, the inter-observer reproducibility and the accuracy all were poor.
- Published
- 2004
- Full Text
- View/download PDF