Search

Study objective To compare 1.5-Tesla (1.5 T) to 3-Tesla (3 T) Magnetic resonance enterography (MRE) in assessing multifocal (multiple lesions affecting the same segment) and multicentric (multiple lesions affecting several digestive segments) bowel endometriosis in patients with suspected-colorectal endometriosis, in routine practice. Study design We conducted a retrospective, comparative study in Tenon University Hospital, Paris, France. We included patients scheduled for colorectal resection from April 2014 to February 2018. All patients underwent 1.5 T or 3 T MRE before surgery and endometriosis lesions were confirmed by surgery. The diagnostic performance of 1.5 T and 3 T MRE was evaluated by sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values (PPV and NPV), accuracy, positive and negative likelihood ratios (LR) and area under the curve of receiver operating curves (AUC ROC). Results Ninety-eight patients were included. Fifty-two (53%) patients presented unifocal lesions, 31 (32%) multifocal lesions, and 23 (24%) multicentric lesions. In assessment of multifocal lesions, the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative LRs were 0.57 (12/21), 0.89 (23/26), 4.95 and 0.58 for 1.5 T MRE, and 0.10 (1/10), 0.95 (39/41), 2.05 and 0.95 for 3 T MRE. For the diagnosis of multicentric lesions, 1.5 T MRE showed sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative LRs of 0.46 (5 of 11), 0.92 (33 of 36), 5.45 and 0.60 respectively and 3 T MRE showed sensitivity, specificity, and negative LRs of 0.33 (4/12), 1.00 (39/39), and 0.67, respectively. 1.5 T MRE was more accurate than 3 T MRE for diagnosing multifocal lesions (p = 0.02), but there was no difference for multicentric lesion assessment (p = 0.66). Conclusion In routine conditions, 3 T MRE and 1.5 T MRE are of similar low performance for diagnosing multifocal and multicentric bowel endometriosis.

Uteroabdominal wall fistula (UAWF) is a very rare complication of cesarean section. We report an unusual case of a UAWF occurring in a 37-year-old woman 4 years after a cesarean section and previous radical surgery for deep infiltrating endometriosis with bowel resection. The patient presented with persistent purulent discharge of the Pfannenstiel scar and noted that the discharge was blood stained during menstruation. Magnetic resonance imaging confirmed the diagnosis of UAWF. Surgery was performed by laparotomy and was complicated by a postoperative rectovaginal fistula, which was successfully treated by the placement of a biological mesh via the vagina route. The postoperative course was favorable at 6 months with disappearance of painful symptoms and good quality of the colorectal anastomosis. A systematic review was conducted, and 18 case reports were found from 1939 to 2016. This case report highlights the risk of postdelivery complications in women with deep infiltrating endometriosis and colorectal involvement, especially after cesarean section. Persistent abdominal discharge in this context should suggest a diagnosis of UAWF despite its low incidence. Finally, the vaginal route for rectovaginal fistula might be considered an option for patients with prior multiple laparotomies.

International audience; Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI) on nomogram-based predictions of lymph node (LN) metastasis in endometrial cancer. Methods: The data from 485 patients with presumed stage I or II endometrial cancer who underwent hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy were analyzed. Calibration curves were designed and compared for three different subgroups: LVSI-positive tumors (n = 113), LVSI-negative tumors (n = 213) and LVSI-undetermined tumors (n = 159). Results: In the entire population, the nomogram showed good discrimination with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.80 and was well calibrated. In the subgroup analyses, in LVSI-positive, LVSI-negative and LVSI-undetermined patients, the nomogram was not well calibrated (p of the U index of 0.028, 0.087 and 0.011, respectively) with underestimation in LVSI-positive patients and overestimation in LVSI-negative and LVSI-undetermined patients of LN metastasis. In the univariate analysis and after adjusting for the LN metastasis probability provided by the nomogram, LVSI-positive tumors were associated with an increased risk for LN metastasis compared with LVSI-negative tumors (RR = 7.29 [3.87-13.7] and 5.04 [2.30-11.08], respectively). In contrast, the univariate analysis and after adjusting for the LN metastasis probability provided by the nomogram showed that LVSI-undetermined tumors were not associated with an increased risk for LN metastasis compared with LVSI-negative tumors (RR = 0.73 [0.32-1.69] and 1.26 [0.47-3.37], respectively). Conclusions: Our results suggested that LVSI should be considered to be an independent risk factor for LN metastasis. In this multicenter study, the risk for LN metastasis is similar when the LVSI is negative or is not detailed in the pathological report.