Search

Objectives To examine the five-year prognosis and potential prognostic factors of patients with an acute lateral ankle sprain in primary care setting. Design Observational study. Methods 206 patients who participated in a cross-sectional study and visited their general practitioner with an acute lateral ankle sprain 6–12 months prior to inclusion were approached for a 5-year follow-up measurement consisting of an online questionnaire. At baseline patients completed standardized questionnaires, underwent a standardized physical examination and radiological examination (radiography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging) and scored their perceived recovery. Logistic regression analysis was used to examine potential predictive factors at baseline for the presence of persistent complaints after 5 years. Results 132 (64.1%) patients completed the 5-year follow-up. 18.2% reported persistent complaints and 30.3% had a re-sprain during follow-up. Baseline persistent complaints 6–12 months after an acute lateral ankle sprain (OR 6.38; CI 95% 1.54–26.44), dominant leg injury (OR 4.89; CI 95% 1.16–20.62) and a recurrent ankle sprain (OR 9.81; CI 95% 2.17–44.47) were significant predictors for persistent complaints 5 years after an acute ankle sprain. Physical examination and radiological findings did not add to the predictive value of the prognostic model. Conclusions Almost 20% of patients with an acute lateral ankle sprain experience persistent complaints after 5 years follow-up. Predictive factors for persistent complaints can be identified.

Background To evaluate intermediate care for knee and hip osteoarthritis (KHOA) in the general practice that incorporate specialist services into general practice to prevent unnecessary referrals to hospitals. Methods We used a mixed methods approach including semi-structured interviews, patient experience questionnaires and data from medical records from three intermediate care projects. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with patients, general practitioners (GPs), orthopaedists and a healthcare manager in intermediate care. Satisfaction of patients who received intermediate care (n = 100) was collected using questionnaires. Referral data and healthcare consumption from medical records were collected retrospectively from KHOA patients before (n = 96) and after (n = 208) the implementation of intermediate care. Results GPs and orthopaedists in intermediate care experienced more intensive collaboration compared to regular care. This led to a perceived increase in GPs’ knowledge enabling better selection of referrals to orthopaedics and less healthcare consumption. Orthopaedists felt a higher workload and limited access to diagnostic facilities. Patients were satisfied and experienced better access to specialists’ knowledge in a trusted environment compared to regular care. Referrals to physiotherapy increased significantly after the implementation of intermediate care (absolute difference = 15%; 95% CI = 7.19 to 22.8), but not significantly to orthopaedics (absolute difference = 5.9%; 95% CI = -6.18 to 17.9). Conclusions Orthopaedists and GPs perceived the benefits of an intensified collaboration in intermediate care. Intermediate care may contribute to high quality of care through more physiotherapy referrals. Further research with longer follow-up is needed to confirm these findings and give more insight in referrals and healthcare consumption.

© 2016 American Pain Society Worldwide, approximately 1 to 2% of the adult population suffers from chronic headache due to overuse of pain medication. Guidelines recommend acute withdrawal of medication, but the optimal treatment remains unknown. We aimed to evaluate the benefit of treatments for patients with medication overuse headache (MOH). We performed an extensive literature search until November 2015, selecting randomized controlled trials that evaluated interventions for adults with MOH. Two authors assessed the eligible trials and extracted data. We calculated effect estimates and used the random effects model for the pooled analysis. Our primary outcome measures were ‘headache days’ and ‘days with medication.’ Outcome data were categorized as short-term (up to 12 weeks) or long-term (≥12 weeks) outcomes. This review consists of 16 trials including 1,105 patients. Four trials evaluated the use of prednisone with placebo or celecoxib after medication withdrawal; 7 trials evaluated various methods of withdrawal versus other methods of withdrawal, and 5 trials evaluated prophylactic medication compared with placebo or ibuprofen. We found no significant differences in headache days between prednisone versus placebo or between outpatient versus inpatient treatment, but we found a significant difference in days with medication. Overall, we found no benefit of prophylactic medication versus placebo. We found low to very low quality of evidence of no benefit of prednisone, prophylaxis, and various withdrawal interventions. Because the burden of MOH for patients is enormous, larger and high-quality intervention trials are needed. Perspective This article presents a critical look at studies of patients with MOHs. It appears that the withdrawal strategy remains the best treatment option, although there is scant evidence on the efficacy of any treatment options.

Context Although a large percentage of children with advanced-stage cancer die at home, remarkably little information is available regarding the experience of general practitioners (GPs) with respect to providing home-based palliative care to children with incurable cancer. Objectives The objective of this study was to explore the perspectives of GPs who care for children with advanced-stage cancer in a home-based setting. Methods In this cross-sectional study, 144 GPs who provided home-based palliative care to 150 children with incurable cancer from 2001 through 2010 were invited to complete a questionnaire addressing their perspectives regarding: 1) symptom management, 2) collaboration with other health care professionals, 3) the child's death and care after death, and 4) impact of having provided palliative care, scored on distress thermometer (range 0–10). Results A total of 112 GPs (78%) responded, and 91 GPs completed the questionnaire for 93 patients. The median interval between the child's death and completing the questionnaire was seven years. The most prevalent symptoms reported in the patients were fatigue (67%) and pain (61%). Difficulties with communicating with (14%), coordinating with (11%), collaborating with (11%), and contacting (2%) fellow members of the multidisciplinary treatment team were rare. Hectic (7%) and shocking (5%) situations and panic (2%) around the child's death were rare. GPs reported feelings of sadness (61%) and/or powerlessness (43%) around the time of the patient's death, and they rated their own distress level as relatively high during the terminal phase (median score 6, range 0–9.5). The majority of GPs (94%) reported that they ultimately came to terms with the child's death. Conclusion In general, GPs appear to be satisfied with the quality of home-based palliative care that they provide pediatric patients with incurable cancer. Communication among health care professionals is generally positive and is considered important. Finally, although the death of a pediatric patient has a profound impact on the GP, the majority of GPs eventually come to terms with the child's death.

Historically, palliative care has been developed for cancer patients and is not yet generally available far patients suffering from chronic life-limiting illnesses, such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). To examine whether COPD patients experience similar or worse disease burden in comparison with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, we compared the health-related quality of life (HRQOL) scores of severe COPD patients with those of advanced NSCLC patients. We also formally updated previous evidence in this area provided by a landmark study published by Gore et al. in 2000. In updating this previous evidence, we addressed the methodological limitations of this study and a number of confounding variables. Eighty-two GOLD IV COPD patients and 19 Stage IIIb or IV NSCLC patients completed genetic and disease-specific HRQOL questionnaires. We used an individual patient data meta-analysis to integrate the new and existing evidence (total n = 201). Finally, to enhance between-group comparability, we performed a sensitivity analysis using a subgroup of patients with a similar degree of "terminality," namely those who had died within one year after study entry. Considerable differences in HRQOL were found for physical functioning, social functioning, mental health, general health perceptions, dyspnea, activities of daily living, and depression. All differences favored the NSCLC patients. The sensitivity analysis, using only terminal NSCLC and COPD patients, confirmed these findings. In conclusion, end-stage COPD patients experience poor HRQOL comparable to or worse than that of advanced NSCLC patients. We discuss these findings in the light of the notion that these COPD patients may have a similar need for palliative care. J Pain Symptom Manage 2009;37:973-981. (C) 2009 U.S. Cancer Pain Relief Committee. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved

Objective To give an overview of relevant literature regarding health care needs in end-stage COPD and to identify specific areas where knowledge about needs is still lacking. Methods We conducted a structured literature review. We used Bradshaw's classification system. Results Seventy-seven publications were found. Ten publications were included in the review. The results reported cover a wide range of subjects, all regarded as health care needs. Most reported on ‘felt need’, i.e. needs that are mentioned by patients themselves. Results on ‘normative need’ (based on expert judgement) were lacking. Conclusion The literature about the health care needs of patients in the end-stage of COPD is sparse, and there is no commonly accepted definition of health care needs. Looking at the increasing demand for end of life care for COPD patients, there is a clear need for further research on this subject. Practice implications We especially need to focus on agreement between experts and professionals so that guidelines can be developed. To attend to the unfulfilled needs of end-stage COPD patients, the delivery of health care should be re-examined carefully.

Contains fulltext : 53646.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Closed access) OBJECTIVE: In this study among patients with cancer in the palliative phase, we analysed whether assessing the symptom, which is causing the most trouble in the patient's every day life ('most troublesome' symptom) had added value apart from the presence and severity of symptoms, which are most commonly assessed in clinical practice. METHODS: Patients with cancer (lung, gastro-intestinal, breast cancer) in the palliative phase from two non-academic hospitals were included in the study. Using the Symptom Monitor tool, 10 physical symptoms were assessed with regard to presence and severity. The Symptom Monitor has an extra added item indicating as the 'most troublesome' symptom. This item was monitored to determine whether it had added value apart from the presence of symptoms and 'most severe' symptom. The severity score on the indicated 'most troublesome' symptom was subtracted from the severity score of the 'most severe' symptom. The generated delta score of 0 indicated no added value, whereas a score of one or more indicated that the 'most troublesome' symptom would have been missed if not specifically asked for by the physician, because its severity was lower that the 'most severe' symptom. RESULTS: One hundred and forty-six patients reported 590 symptoms to be present. In total, 227 symptoms were reported as 'most severe' symptom (n = 138 patients). Among these, fatigue (n = 52) and pain (n = 24) were reported most frequently as 'most severe' symptom. In total, 134 patients indicated a symptom as 'most troublesome'. Fatigue (n = 33; 25%) and pain (n = 22; 16%) were also indicated by most of these patients as the 'most troublesome' symptom. One hundred and fifty-two comparisons could be made between the 'most severe' and the 'most troublesome' symptom. In 102 (67%) of the comparisons assessing the 'most troublesome' symptom had no added value: the score for 'most severe' symptom did not differ from the score for the 'most troublesome' symptom revealing a delta score of 0. In 23 times (15%) of the 152 comparisons made, the delta score was 1 and in 27 (18%) of the comparisons the delta score was 2 or more indicating that assessing the 'most troublesome' symptom substantially had added value. CONCLUSION: In patients in the palliative phase of their disease, extra attention for the 'most troublesome' symptom is needed. In our study, in almost 1/3 of the cases, this symptom would have been missed the physicians attention if not specifically asked for. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: We recommend not only to assess the presence and severity of symptoms, but furthermore to assess the patient's 'most troublesome' symptom in addition.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility, reliability and compliance of a new instrument, a diary to monitor physical symptoms for patients with cancer in the palliative phase of their illness. The development of the diary took place in three phases: two pilot studies and one intervention study. In Pilot I, reliability was tested within 13 pairs of patients and their proxy in a patient-proxy comparison. Pilot II was performed to test the feasibility of the instrument among 47 frail elderly. In the intervention study among patients with cancer in the palliative phase, the feasibility as well as the compliance has been tested. The phases have been completed with good results: reliability (ICC) of prevalent symptoms was above 0.75, good feasibility and good compliance. The Symptom Monitor can be used by patients and doctors as an instrument to monitor physical symptoms. The effectiveness of the use of this diary for improvement in treatment of symptoms in the palliative phase of cancer is being tested in a randomized clinical trial.

The extent to which a chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patient is impaired in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is only to a small extent reflected in clinical and demographical measures. As the influence of comorbidity on HRQoL is less clear, we investigated the added value of 23 common diseases in predicting HRQoL in COPD patients with mild to severe airways obstruction. COPD patients from general practice who appeared to have an forced expiratory volume in 1 sec/inspiratory vital capacity (FEV1/IVC) < predicted -1.64 SD, FEV1