Search

Aims To examine the effectiveness of a one-day skills training program for increasing trauma inquiry in routine substance use disorder treatment. Design Cluster-randomized two-armed controlled trial, with 12 substance use disorder (SUD) organizations operating 25 counseling centers, randomly assigned to training in trauma inquiry (13 counseling centers of 8 SUD organizations) or no training (12 counseling centers of 4 SUD organizations). Setting SUD counseling centers in Northern Germany. Cases N = 5204 SUD counseling services. Intervention The professionals assigned to the intervention group received a one-day training in trauma inquiry plus a 1.5-hour refresher session 3 months later. Professionals in the control group received no training. Measures Over a 12-month period, professionals documented for each counseling service whether they asked the client about four traumatic events: physical abuse, emotional abuse, sexual abuse and neglect. Analysis Primary outcomes were rates of asking about physical abuse, sexual abuse, emotional abuse and neglect in the 6 months after training. These were compared across conditions, while adjusting for baseline probabilities in the 6 months before training, using mixed-effects logistic regression. Findings In the 6 months after training, the rate of asking about physical abuse was 18% higher in the SUD counseling services of trained professionals, relative to services of untrained professionals (OR = 1.18, 95% CI = [1.01–1.37, p = .035]). No effect was found for asking about sexual abuse, emotional abuse and neglect. Conclusion A one-day training program in trauma inquiry, combined with a brief refresher session, was effective in increasing inquiries about physical abuse in routine counseling practice. The training was ineffective in increasing inquiries about sexual abuse, emotional abuse and neglect. The effectiveness of a one-day training of trauma inquiry might be increased by a longer training, or by combining it with additional elements, such as ongoing supervision.

The dissociative subtype of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) was officially introduced in the fifth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5). In accordance with this new classification, prior studies using Latent Class Analysis (LCA) empirically identified a subgroup of patients that were characterized by a high severity of dissociative symptoms. Despite the high prevalence of PTSD in patients with substance use disorders (SUD), however, no LCA studies on the dissociative subtype of PTSD exist in this population so far. Therefore, the current study aimed to identify subgroups of patients with different symptom and exposure profiles in patients with SUD and PTSD. It was assumed that one symptom and exposure profile could be identified that would be characterized by higher dissociative symptoms, higher additional psychopathology and a higher burden of childhood trauma, as compared to other subgroups. In N = 258 female patients with SUD and PTSD, clinical characteristics of dissociative symptoms, PTSD severity, borderline personality disorder (BPD), depression, childhood trauma and substance abuse were assessed. To identify symptom and exposure profiles, Latent Class Analysis was applied. A three-class solution indicated the best model fit to our data. One class was characterized by a high probability of dissociative symptoms (D-PTSD class), whereas the other two classes were characterized by lower probabilities of dissociative symptoms. The D-PTSD class encompassed 18.7% of the patients. In accordance with our hypothesis, the D-PTSD class showed higher probabilities of PTSD severity, borderline personality disorder symptoms, depressive symptoms, childhood emotional and sexual abuse, childhood emotional neglect, and drug abuse. Our results indicate that the dissociative subtype of PTSD could also be identified in a sample of female patients with SUD. Patients with SUD and PTSD characterized by the dissociative subtype showed more severe psychopathological symptoms than the remaining patients, indicating enhanced clinical needs for this vulnerable group.

Background Non-prescribed use of opioid substitution medication (NPU) appears to represent a relevant source of opioids among European drug users. Little is known about the prevalence of NPU in Germany and possible differences between subgroups of opioid users. The present study examines NPU and other drug use patterns among drug consumption room (DCR) clients, opioid substituted DCR clients, and patients recruited in opioid substitution treatment (OST) practices. Methods Cross-sectional data was collected in 2011 from 842 opioid users in 10 DCRs and 12 OST practices across 11 German cities. Structured interviews comprised indicators for socio-demographics, health status, drug use, motives for NPU, and the availability and price of illicit substitution medication. Group differences were examined with one-way ANOVAs, chi-square tests, or t -tests, and factors for NPU were included in a multivariate model. Over-time comparisons were performed with similar data collected in 2008. Results Lifetime, 30-day and 24-h NPU prevalence for the total sample was 76.5%, 21.9%, and 9.3%, respectively, with methadone being the most frequently used substance. NPU, poly-drug use and injection drug use were more common among DCR clients, especially among DCR clients not in OST. The three groups featured distinct socio-demographic characteristics, with substituted patients being more socially integrated, while few differences in health parameters emerged. Motives for NPU were mostly related to potential shortcomings of OST, such as insufficient dosages, difficulties with transportation, and lack of access. NPU prevalence was found to be higher than in 2008, while injection rate of substitution medication was similarly low. Main factors associated with NPU were not being in OST, past 24-h use of other drugs, and younger age. Conclusion Although diverted methadone or buprenorphine are rarely used as main drugs, NPU is prevalent among opioid users, particularly among DCR clients not in OST. OST reduces NPU if opioid users' needs are met.