Search

Accurately modeling tumor biology and testing novel therapies on patient-derived cells is critically important to developing therapeutic regimens personalized to a patient's specific disease. The vascularized micro-tumor (VMT), or "tumor-on-a-chip", is a physiologic preclinical cancer model that incorporates key features of the native human tumor microenvironment within a transparent microfluidic platform, allowing rapid drug screening in vitro. Herein we optimize methods for generating patient-derived VMT (pVMT) using fresh colorectal cancer (CRC) biopsies and surgical resections to test drug sensitivities at the individual patient level. In response to standard chemotherapy and TGF-βR1 inhibition, we observe heterogeneous responses between pVMT derived from 6 patient biopsies, with the pVMT recapitulating tumor growth, histological features, metabolic heterogeneity and drug responses of actual CRC tumors. Our results suggest that a translational infrastructure providing rapid information from patient-derived tumor cells in the pVMT, as established in this study, will support efforts to improve patient outcomes.

Background Locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) has a dismal prognosis with current treatment modalities and one-third of patients die from local progression of disease. Preclinical studies with orthotopic PC demonstrated dramatic synergy between radiotherapy (RT) and the poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1/2 inhibitor (PARPi), veliparib. We conducted a phase I trial of gemcitabine, radiotherapy and dose-escalated veliparib in LAPC. Methods This was a single institution investigator-initiated open-label, single-arm phase 1 clinical trial (NCT01908478). Weekly gemcitabine with daily IMRT and veliparib dose escalated using a Bayesian adaptive design were administered in treatment naive LA or borderline resectable PC. The primary end point was identification of the MTD. Secondary endpoints included efficacy, characterization of PAR levels using ELISA, DDR alterations with targeted next generation sequencing and transcriptome analysis, tumor mutation burden (TMB) and microsatellite instability (MSI) status. Findings Thirty patients were enrolled. The MTD of veliparib was 40 mg BID with gemcitabine 400 mg/m2 and RT (36 Gy/15 fractions). Sixteen DLTs were identified in 12 patients. Grade ≥ 3 adverse events included lymphopenia (96%) and anemia (36%). Median OS for all patients was 15 months. Median OS for DDR pathway gene altered and intact cases was 19 months (95% CI: 6.2–27.2) and 14 months (95% CI: 10.0–21.8), respectively. There were no significant associations between levels of PAR, TMB, or MSI with outcomes. The DDR transcripts PARP3 and RBX1 significantly correlated with OS. Interpretation This is the first report of a PARPi-chemoradiotherapy combination in PC. The regimen was safe, tolerable at the RP2D, and clinically active as an upfront treatment strategy in patients biologically unselected by upfront chemotherapy. Expression of the DDR transcripts, PARP3 and RBX1, were associated with OS suggesting validation in a follow up phase 2 study. Fund Phase One Foundation; National Institutes of Health [1R01CA188480-01A1, P01 CA098912]. Veliparib was provided by Abbvie.

Purpose Single agent PD-1 inhibitors have yielded durable responses in a minority of gastroesophageal cancers. Radiation therapy has been recognized to promote antitumor immune responses and may synergize with anti-PD-1 agents. We sought to evaluate if combining palliative radiation therapy with pembrolizumab can augment antitumor immune responses in gastroesophageal cancer. Methods and Materials Patients had metastatic gastroesophageal cancer with indication for palliative radiation therapy with ≥2 disease sites outside of the radiation field assessable for abscopal response and biopsies for laboratory correlative analyses. Palliative radiation was delivered to a dose of 30 Gy over 10 fractions. Pembrolizumab, 200 mg, was administered concurrently intravenously every 3 weeks until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or study withdrawal, for up to 2 years. Endpoints included PD-L1 expression in pre- and posttreatment biopsies and abscopal objective response rate per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. Results Of 14 enrolled patients, the objective response rate was 28.6% (95% confidence interval, 8.4%-58.1%), and the median duration of response was not reached (95% confidence interval, 6.9-NR months). Overall, 2 patients had treatment-related grade 3 to 4 adverse events with no grade 5 events. One patient discontinued therapy due to grade 4 colitis. We did not observe an association between radiation and abscopal changes in PD-L1 expression via assessment of an analogous PD-L1 Combined Positive Score, Tumor Proportion Score, Mononuclear Immune Cell Density Score, or proportion of PD-L1-expressing immune cells between pre- and posttreatment tumor biopsies. Conclusions Combining palliative radiation therapy and pembrolizumab provided promising durable responses in this patient population but we were unable to definitively distinguish abscopal biologic changes. Biomarker analyses beyond PD-L1 expression are needed to better understand putative mechanisms and identify patients who will benefit from this approach.

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has emerged as a paradigm for clinical application of precision medicine as optimal therapy is commonly chosen based on genomic biomarkers identified in a patient’s tumor sample. Recurrent driver alterations are well described, however, a need to continually identify rare variants remains clinically relevant. We identified an incident case of advanced NSCLC with a PDGFR-α N848 K activation loop mutation with no other concurrent oncogenic drivers. Amino acid sequence alignment confirmed homology to the imatinib-sensitive KIT N822 K activation loop mutation observed in GIST. The patient achieved a 2-year response to single agent imatinib that is ongoing. While PDGFR-α N848 K is rare among public sequencing databases our cases strongly suggests functional relevance and highlights the importance of studying rare variants in NSCLC.

Introduction Erb-b2 receptor tyrosine kinase (HER2) transmembrane domain (TMD) mutations (HER2 V659E , HER2 G660D ) have previously been identified in lung adenocarcinomas, but their frequency and clinical significance is unknown. Methods We prospectively analyzed 8551 consecutive lung adenocarcinomas using hybrid capture–based comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) at the request of the individual treating physicians for the purpose of making therapy decisions. Results We identified 15 cases (0.18%) of HER2 TMD mutations (HER2 V659E/D , HER2 G660D ) through CGP of 8551 lung adenocarcinomas. HER2 TMD mutations were mutually exclusive from HER2 kinase domain mutations and other oncogenic drivers in lung adenocarcinoma. Only two cases with HER2 TMD mutations (13%) had concurrent Erb-b2 receptor tyrosine kinase 2 gene ( HER2 ) amplification. Structural analysis of HER2 TMD association revealed that mutations at positions V659 and G660 to the highly polar residues glutamic acid, aspartic acid, or arginine should stabilize homodimerization and heterodimerization of HER2 in the active conformation. Treatment with afatinib, a pan-HER inhibitor, resulted in durable clinical response in three of four patients with lung adenocarcinoma, with two harboring HER2 V659E and one with double HER2 V659E/G660R mutations. HER2 TMD mutations (V659 and G660) are found in other non-NSCLC malignancies, and analogous TMD mutations are also found in EGFR, HER3, and HER4. Conclusion HER2 TMD mutations represent rare but distinct targetable driver mutations in lung adenocarcinoma. CGP capable of detecting diverse HER2 alterations, including HER2 TMD mutations, should be broadly adopted to identify all patients who may benefit from HER2-targeted therapies.

Introduction MET proto-oncogene, receptor tyrosine kinase gene exon 14 skipping ( MET ex14) alterations represent a unique subset of oncogenic drivers in NSCLC. Preliminary clinical activity of crizotinib against MET ex14-positive NSCLC has been reported. The full spectrum of resistance mechanisms to crizotinib in MET ex14-positive NSCLC remains to be identified. Methods Hybrid capture–based comprehensive genomic profiling performed on a tumor specimen obtained at diagnosis, and a hybrid capture–based assay of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) at the time of progression during crizotinib treatment was assessed in a pairwise fashion. Results A MET ex14 alteration (D1010H) was detected in the pretreatment tumor biopsy specimen, as was MET proto-oncogene, receptor tyrosine kinase (MET) Y1230C, retrospectively, at very low frequency (0.3%). After a confirmed response during crizotinib treatment for 13 months followed by progression, both MET proto-oncogene, receptor tyrosine kinase gene Y1230C and D1010H were detected prospectively in the ctDNA. Conclusion Emergence of the preexisting MET Y1230C likely confers resistance to crizotinib in this case of MET ex14-positive NSCLC. Existence of pretreatment MET Y1230C may eventually modulate the response of MET ex14-positive NSCLC to type I MET tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Noninvasive plasma-based ctDNA assays can provide a convenient method to detect resistance mutations in patients with previously known driver mutations.

American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM) Task Group 176 evaluated the dosimetric effects caused by couch tops and immobilization devices. The report analyzed the extensive physics-based literature on couch tops, stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) frames, and body immobilization bags, while noting the scarcity of clinical reports of skin toxicity because of external devices. Here, we present a clinical case report of grade 1 abdominal skin toxicity owing to an abdominal compression device. We discuss the dosimetric implications of the utilized treatment plan as well as post hoc alternative plans and quantify differences in attenuation and skin dose/build-up between the device, a lower-density alternative device, and an open field. The description of the case includes a 66-year-old male with HER2 amplified poorly differentiated distal esophageal adenocarcinoma treated with neoadjuvant chemo-radiation and the use of an abdominal compression device. Radiation was delivered using volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) with 2 arcs using abdominal compression and image guidance. The total dose was 50.4Gy delivered over 40 elapsed days. With 2 fractions remaining, the patient developed dermatitis in the area of the compression device. The original treatment plan did not include a contour of the device. Alternative post hoc treatment plans were generated, one to contour the device and a second with anterior avoidance. In conclusion, replanning with the device contoured revealed the bolus effect. The skin dose increased from 27 to 36Gy. planned target volume (PTV) coverage at 45Gy was reduced to 76.5% from 95.8%. The second VMAT treatment plan with an anterior avoidance sector and more oblique beam angles maintained PTV coverage and spared the anterior wall, however at the expense of substantially increased dose to lung. This case report provides an important reminder of the bolus effect from external devices such as abdominal compression. Special consideration must be given to contour and/or avoiding beam entrance to the device, and to the use of such devices in patients who may have heightened radiosensitivity, such as those who are human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-positive.

Objectives Radiation necrosis presenting as pseudoprogression (PsP) is relatively common after radiation and temozolomide (TMZ) treatment in glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), especially among patients with GBM that harbors intrinsic increased responsiveness to TMZ (methylated O6-methylguanine–DNA methyltransferase [MGMT] promoter). Alectinib is a second generation ALK inhibitor that has significant CNS activity against brain metastases in anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-rearranged (ALK+) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Materials and methods We report 2 ALK+ NSCLC patients who met RECIST criteria for progressive disease by central radiologic review due to increased in size from increased contrast enhancement in previously stereotactically radiated brain metastases with ongoing extra-cranial response to alectinib. In both patients alectinib was started within 4 months of completing stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). The enlarging lesions in both patients were resected and found to have undergone extensive necrosis with no residual tumor pathologically. PsP was incorrectly classified as progressive disease even by central independent imaging review. Conclusions Treatment-related necrosis of previously SRS-treated brain metastasis during alectinib treatment can present as PsP. It may be impossible to distinguish PsP from true disease progression without a pathologic examination from resected sample. High degree of clinical suspicion, close monitoring and more sensitive imaging modalities may be needed to distinguish PsP versus progression in radiated brain lesions during alectinib treatment especially if there is no progression extra-cranially.

The emergence of acquired anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) resistant mutations is a common molecular mechanism underpinning disease progression during crizotinib treatment of ALK-positive (ALK+) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Identifying acquired resistance mutations in ALK is paramount for tailoring future therapy with second generation ALK inhibitors and beyond. Comprehensive genomic profiling using hybrid-capture next generation sequencing has been successful in identifying acquired ALK resistance mutations. Here we described the emergence of an ALK F1245C mutation in an advanced ALK+ NSCLC patient (EML4-ALK variant 3a/b) who developed slow disease progression after a durable response to crizotinib. The patient was eventually switched to ceritinib with on-going clinical response. This is the first patient report that ALK F1245C is an acquired resistance mutation to crizotinib that can be overcome by ceritinib.

Huntingtin-interacting protein 1 (HIP1) has recently been identified as a new fusion partner fused to anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) in non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). To date, two variants of HIP1-ALK (H21; A20) and (H28; A20) have been identified in NSCLC. However, the response of patients with NSCLC harboring HIP1-ALK to ALK inhibitors and potential resistance mechanisms to such remain unknown. Here, we report a patient with NSCLC harboring a novel HIP1-ALK fusion variant (H30; A20). This patient and another patient with EML4-ALK variant 3a/b initially responded sequentially to crizotinib and then alectinib, a next-generation ALK inhibitor, but developed acquired resistance to alectinib with the presence of a mutation in amino acid residue 1171 (I1171N and I1171S respectively) located in the hydrophobic regulatory spine (R-spine) of the ALK kinase in both the cases as identified by a comprehensive next-generation sequencing-based assay performed on biopsies of new liver metastases that developed during alectinib treatment.

Acquired secondary mutations in the anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) gene have been identified in ALK-rearranged (ALK+) non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients who developed disease progression while on crizotinib treatment. Here, we identified a novel secondary acquired NSCLC ALK F1174V mutation by comprehensive next-generation sequencing in one ALK+ NSCLC patient who progressed on crizotinib after a prolonged partial response to crizotinib. In a second case, we identified a secondary acquired ALK G1202R, which also confers resistance to alectinib (CH5424802/RO5424802), a second-generation ALK inhibitor that can inhibit ALK gatekeeper L1196M mutation in vitro. ALK G1202R is located at the solvent front of the ALK kinase domain and exhibits a high level of resistance to all other ALK inhibitors currently in clinical development in vitro. Comprehensive genomic profiling of resistant tumor is increasingly important in tailoring treatment decisions after disease progression on crizotinib in ALK+ NSCLC given the promise of second-generation ALK inhibitors and other therapeutic strategies.

A 47-year-old white Hispanic man with a never smoking history was incidentally found to have a right-sided pulmonary nodule, hilar, and mediastinal adenopathy. Sampling of level 10R, 11R, and 7 nodal stations disclosed a carcinoma (Figure 1A) that stained positive, by immunohistochemistry, for thyroid transcription factor 1 (Figure 1B), transformation-related protein 63 (P63; Figure 1C), and cytokeratin (CK5/6; Figure 1D). By using the newly accepted IASLC/ERS classification for lung cancers, the tumor was best classified as a non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), not otherwise specified, possible adenosquamous carcinoma1; because it had both adenocarcinoma (thyroid transcription factor 1) and squamous cell carcinoma (P63, CK5/6) markers. There was no evidence of extrathoracic tumor involvement, and the patient was felt to have stage III NSCLC. The tumor had no epidermal growth factor receptor or V-Ki-ras2 Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (KRAS) gene mutations. A break-apart fluorescence in situ hybridization probe for the anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) demonstrated an ALK translocation.