Search

Lazertinib is a potent, irreversible, brain-penetrant, mutant-selective, and wild type-sparing third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor indicated for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The study aimed to evaluate the effects of food and race on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of lazertinib from a healthy volunteer trial and PK data from NSCLC patients with EGFR mutation.An open-label, single-dose, two-period, single-sequence crossover study was conducted in healthy subjects with two race groups (non-Asian and Asian). Subjects orally received a single dose of lazertinib 240 mg in fasted and fed state (high-fat meal) in each period separated by a 21-day washout. An open-label, multicenter, phase 1/2 study was conducted in Asian and non-Asian patients with NSCLC. Patients were given oral lazertinib 20-320 mg once daily in fasted state continuously in 21-day cycles. PK parameters were evaluated using non-compartmental analysis.A total of 24 healthy subjects (12 non-Asians and 12 Asians) and 52 NSCLC patients (22 non-Asians and 30 Asians) were evaluated. The change in the overall systemic exposure of lazertinib at fed state was less than 15%. Non-Asians showed 58-76% of the systemic exposure than Asians in healthy subjects. In contrast, there were no significant differences in systemic exposure by race both after single and multiple doses among NSCLC patients.Lazertinib can be taken with or without food considering the comparable systemic exposures related to food. Although effect of race was not consistent across studies, there was no evidence for dose adjustment based on race.

A physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model was developed for YH4808, a novel potassium-competitive acid blocker, using the SimCYP® Simulator based on the physicochemical, in vitro preclinical and clinical data of YH4808. The PBPK model was optimized using YH4808 concentrations obtained from the single-dose phase I clinical trial. Overall, the PBPK model adequately predicted the observed pharmacokinetic profiles of YH4808 in humans. The pharmacokinetic profiles of YH4808 after multiple oral administrations were predicted using a refined PBPK model. The ratios of model-predicted to observed Cmax, AUCinf and AUCτ values on Day 1 and Day 7 at 100 mg were 0.7–1.0. However, the model failed to predict a decreased exposure after multiple oral administration particularly at higher doses of 200 and 400 mg. The reduced solubility of YH4808 at higher pH was hypothesized as the main cause of the reduction in exposure such that absorption was decreased as pH was increased. This hypothesis was confirmed by PBPK modeling and simulation, where intragastric pH was increased by YH4808.

Rosuvastatin is indicated for hypercholesterolemia or dyslipidemia and metformin mainly for type 2 diabetes. These 2 drugs are frequently prescribed in combination due to the high comorbidity of the 2 diseases. However the nature of pharmacokinetic interaction between the 2 drugs has not been previously investigated. The purpose of our study was to investigate the pharmacokinetic interaction between rosuvastatin and metformin in healthy Korean male volunteers.This was a randomized, open-label, 6-sequence, 3-period, crossover, multiple-dose study. Eligible subjects, aged 20 to 50 years and within 20% of the ideal body weight, received 1 of the following 3 treatments for each period once daily for 5 consecutive days with a 10-day washout period between the treatments: monoadministration of rosuvastatin 10 mg tablet, monoadministration of metformin 750 mg tablet, and coadministration of rosuvastatin 10 mg tablet with metformin 750 mg tablet. Blood samples were collected up to 72 hours after the last dose and pharmacokinetic parameters for rosuvastatin and metformin were compared between combination and monotherapy. Adverse events were investigated and evaluated based on subject interviews and physical examinations.Among the 36 enrolled subjects, 31 completed the study. The coadministration of rosuvastatin with metformin produced a significant pharmacokinetic interaction in rosuvastatin Css,max, with the 90% CI for the geometric mean ratio (coadministration:monoadministration) being 110.27% to 136.39% (P = 0.0029), whereas no significant interaction was observed in rosuvastatin AUCtau, yielding the 90% CI of 104.41% to 118.95%. When metformin was coadministered with rosuvastatin, no significant pharmacokinetic interaction was observed for Css,max and AUCtau of metformin, yielding the 90% CIs of the geometric mean ratio for coadministration to monoadministration as 87.38% to 102.54% and 86.70% to 99.08%, respectively. Overall, 19 mild and 1 moderate adverse events occurred in 12 subjects, with no significant differences in the incidence among the 3 treatments.Although the Css,max of rosuvastatin was significantly influenced by coadministration with metformin, the degree of interaction seen was considered clinically insignificant, with no significant interaction observed in the other pharmacokinetic measures between the 2 drugs. These results imply that drug effects of rosuvastatin and metformin will also not be significantly influenced by coadministration of the 2 drugs. All treatments were well tolerated and no serious adverse events occurred. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01526317.

Purpose Rosuvastatin is indicated for hypercholesterolemia or dyslipidemia and metformin mainly for type 2 diabetes. These 2 drugs are frequently prescribed in combination due to the high comorbidity of the 2 diseases. However the nature of pharmacokinetic interaction between the 2 drugs has not been previously investigated. The purpose of our study was to investigate the pharmacokinetic interaction between rosuvastatin and metformin in healthy Korean male volunteers. Methods This was a randomized, open-label, 6-sequence, 3-period, crossover, multiple-dose study. Eligible subjects, aged 20 to 50 years and within 20% of the ideal body weight, received 1 of the following 3 treatments for each period once daily for 5 consecutive days with a 10-day washout period between the treatments: monoadministration of rosuvastatin 10 mg tablet, monoadministration of metformin 750 mg tablet, and coadministration of rosuvastatin 10 mg tablet with metformin 750 mg tablet. Blood samples were collected up to 72 hours after the last dose and pharmacokinetic parameters for rosuvastatin and metformin were compared between combination and monotherapy. Adverse events were investigated and evaluated based on subject interviews and physical examinations. Findings Among the 36 enrolled subjects, 31 completed the study. The coadministration of rosuvastatin with metformin produced a significant pharmacokinetic interaction in rosuvastatin C ss,max , with the 90% CI for the geometric mean ratio (coadministration:monoadministration) being 110.27% to 136.39% ( P = 0.0029), whereas no significant interaction was observed in rosuvastatin AUC tau , yielding the 90% CI of 104.41% to 118.95%. When metformin was coadministered with rosuvastatin, no significant pharmacokinetic interaction was observed for C ss,max and AUC tau of metformin, yielding the 90% CIs of the geometric mean ratio for coadministration to monoadministration as 87.38% to 102.54% and 86.70% to 99.08%, respectively. Overall, 19 mild and 1 moderate adverse events occurred in 12 subjects, with no significant differences in the incidence among the 3 treatments. Implications Although the C ss,max of rosuvastatin was significantly influenced by coadministration with metformin, the degree of interaction seen was considered clinically insignificant, with no significant interaction observed in the other pharmacokinetic measures between the 2 drugs. These results imply that drug effects of rosuvastatin and metformin will also not be significantly influenced by coadministration of the 2 drugs. All treatments were well tolerated and no serious adverse events occurred. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01526317.

Background To date, no definitive treatment of functional dyspepsia (FD) has been proven to be effective and reasonably well-tolerated. Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) combined with prokinetic agents are considered an effective option. Revaprazan is a selective potassium-competitive acid blocker that reversibly inhibits gastric H + /K + -ATPase and shows effective acid suppression comparable to PPIs. Itopride is a prokinetic agent that has anticholinesterase activity as well as dopamine D 2 receptor antagonistic activity. For this reason, revaprazan and itopride have been prescribed for FD; however, no available studies have reported the pharmacokinetic interactions of these 2 drugs. Objective The objective of this study was to compare the bioavailability and tolerability of revaprazan and itopride combination therapy to those of equally dosed monotherapies to acquire basic drug–drug interaction information about revaprazan. Methods This multiple-dose, randomized crossover study was conducted in healthy male Korean subjects. Subjects received, in randomized sequence, a 7-day oral dose of revaprazan 200 mg once daily, itopride 50 mg TID, or both. Each treatment period was separated by a 7-day washout period. Blood samples were collected for up to 24 hours following the last dose at steady state, and drug concentrations were determined using validated LC/MS-MS. Pharmacokinetic properties were obtained using noncompartmental analysis. Drug tolerability was assessed throughout the study, using measurements of vital signs, clinical chemistry testing, and interviews. Results A total of 30 subjects were enrolled in the study. Among them, 28 subjects completed revaprazan treatment, and 27 completed the study (3 subjects were withdrawn). The geometric mean ratios (GMRs) (90% CI) of C max,ss , and AUC τ,ss with revaprazan were 0.92 (0.84–1.00) and 0.96 (0.89–1.03), respectively. The GMRs of C max,ss and AUC τ,ss with itopride were 1.07 (0.96–1.20) and 1.12 (1.06–1.18), respectively. A total of 15 adverse events (AEs) were reported in 8 subjects. All AEs were considered to be mild, and there were no clinically significant differences between treatment groups. Conclusion The findings from this study suggest bioequivalence between revaprazan given as monotherapy and in combination with itopride in these healthy Korean male volunteers, with no clinical significant drug–drug interaction. All treatments in this study was generally well tolerated. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT0133289.

Nowadays, attempts to use nanoparticles for medical applications are on the rise. However, the effect of nanoparticles in the body has not been clarified. In this study, we aimed to examine the pharmacokinetics of magnetized nanoparticles. FITC conjugated SA-MnMEIO nanoparticles were prepared for the purpose of tracing. Nanoparticles (15 nm diameter) were injected into the tail vein of BALB/c mice at a dose of 20 mg (Mn+Fe)/kg. A mouse was housed in a metabolic cage and sacrificed serially up to 14 days for the sampling of blood and tissues from various organs (i.e., heart, kidney, liver, and spleen). The concentration of nanoparticles was measured by detecting FITC using spectrofluorophotometer. Nanoparticles showed a half-life of 8.20 h. The fluorescence intensities of nanoparticles in tissues showed different time-dependent patterns among different organs. In the heart and the liver, the fluorescence intensities increased up to 2 weeks of observation, while those in the kidney and the spleen decreased. The results indicate that nanoparticles have unique pharmacokinetic characteristics and suggest that pharmacokinetic study is essential for the development of new nanoparticles for medical use.