1. Is the Empirical Out-of-Sample Variance an Informative Risk Measure for the High-Dimensional Portfolios?
- Author
-
Taras Bodnar, Nestor Parolya, and Erik Thorsén
- Subjects
FOS: Economics and business ,Random matrix theory ,Statistical Finance (q-fin.ST) ,Portfolio Management (q-fin.PM) ,Parameter uncertainty ,High-dimensional covariance matrix ,Quantitative Finance - Statistical Finance ,Minimum variance portfolio ,Shrinkage estimator ,Finance ,Quantitative Finance - Portfolio Management - Abstract
The main contribution of this paper is the derivation of the asymptotic behaviour of the out-of-sample variance, the out-of-sample relative loss, and of their empirical counterparts in the high-dimensional setting, i.e., when both ratios $p/n$ and $p/m$ tend to some positive constants as $m\to\infty$ and $n\to\infty$, where $p$ is the portfolio dimension, while $n$ and $m$ are the sample sizes from the in-sample and out-of-sample periods, respectively. The results are obtained for the traditional estimator of the global minimum variance (GMV) portfolio, for the two shrinkage estimators introduced by \cite{frahm2010} and \cite{bodnar2018estimation}, and for the equally-weighted portfolio, which is used as a target portfolio in the specification of the two considered shrinkage estimators. We show that the behaviour of the empirical out-of-sample variance may be misleading is many practical situations. On the other hand, this will never happen with the empirical out-of-sample relative loss, which seems to provide a natural normalization of the out-of-sample variance in the high-dimensional setup. As a result, an important question arises if this risk measure can safely be used in practice for portfolios constructed from a large asset universe., 21 pages, 5 figures
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF