Search

Introduction The oral neurokinin-1 antagonist aprepitant is recommended in several guidelines for preventing chemotherapy-induced nausea & vomiting (CINV) due to highly emetogenic cancer chemotherapy. Little is known about the feasibility and safety of aprepitant in patients treated with oxaliplatin. Methods In this multicentre, open label, randomised, phase 3 trial, we recruited patients with colorectal cancer who underwent an oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy. Patients were centrally randomised in a 1:1 ratio to the control group (5-HT 3 -receptor antagonist+dexamethasone) or aprepitant group (5-HT 3 -receptor antagonist+dexamethasone+aprepitant or fosaprepitant) in the first course. All patients were treated with aprepitant/fosaprepitant therapy in the second course. The primary end-point was the proportion of patients with no emesis. Results A total of 413 patients entered this clinical trial from 25 centres in Japan. Significantly more patients in the aprepitant group achieved no vomiting overall and delayed phase than those in the control group (95.7% versus 83.6%, and 95.7% versus 84.7%, respectively). The aprepitant group also had statistically significantly higher percentages of no significant nausea, complete response and complete protection than the control group overall. In the control group, the percentages of no vomiting were higher in the second cycle than in the first cycle. The incidence of vomiting occurred day 7 or later was significantly higher in the control group compared with the aprepitant group. Other adverse events were not significant between the groups. Conclusion The aprepitant therapy was more effective than the control therapy for prevention of CINV in colorectal cancer patients receiving an oxaliplatin-based regimen.

Background Portal or splenic vein thrombosis (PSVT) is a common disorder after laparoscopic splenectomy (LS). Splenomegaly is a well-known risk factor for PSVT. However, no treatment strategy for PSVT has been established. Methods Thirty-three consecutive patients who had undergone LS and postoperative imaging surveillance were examined. PSVT was classified according to the site of thrombosis. We evaluated patient background, operative factors, and clinical symptoms. Results Spleen weight of patients with PSVT (n = 17, median 218 g) was greater than that of patients without PSVT (n = 16, median 101 g). Seven patients developed thrombosis involving the entire splenic vein (total splenic vein thrombosis), and 4 of them had clinical symptoms (fever >38°C and/or abdominal pain). The incidence of clinical symptoms was significantly more frequent in patients with than without total SVT. Operation time, blood loss, and spleen weight were also significantly greater in patients with total SVT. Multiple logistic regression analysis demonstrated spleen weight was the strongest predictor of PSVT and total SVT. Conclusion Patients with total SVT have greater risk factors for PSVT and frequently have clinical symptoms. They are candidates for anticoagulation therapy.