Search

The purpose was to present a total description, distribution, and ranking of chronic pain conditions in the general population. This was based on structured clinical examinations of a random sample from a population-based survey (HUNT3) with a calculated oversampling of participants with chronic pain. Supplemented with access to hospital reports, the examination was performed by experienced physicians and psychologists using a consistent definition of chronic pain as well as ICD-10- and the new ICD-11-classification. The main findings were that a higher proportion of the 551 participants had chronic pain assessed by clinical examination (399) than by self-report in a survey the same day (337). Among those with examination-verified chronic pain estimated from HUNT3 to represent 27.9% of the general population, 63% had chronic primary pain, 81% musculoskeletal pain, and 77% more than one chronic pain condition. When separating chronic primary from chronic secondary pain according to ICD-11, the weighted prevalence was 17.7% for chronic pain conditions of unknown and 10.2% of known cause. When all the participants’ conditions were accounted for, the most prevalent were nonspecific low back (10.8%) and neck pain (7.6%). Participants with chronic primary pain did not have significantly more psychopathology than those with chronic secondary pain: 14.5% vs. 12.5%. Perspective: Since this study confirms the high prevalence in self-report surveys and indicates that two thirds of chronic pain conditions cannot be explained by underlying diseases, this huge health and societal problem should be solved primarily on a public health level directed towards prevention and rehabilitation.

That certain psychological factors are negatively associated with function in patients with chronic pain is well established. However, few studies have evaluated these factors in individuals with chronic pain from the general population. The aims of this study were to: 1) evaluate the unique associations between catastrophizing and perceived solicitous responses and psychological function, physical function, and insomnia severity in individuals with neuropathic pain, osteoarthritis, or spinal pain in the general population; and 2) determine if diagnosis moderates the associations found. Five hundred fifty-one individuals from the general population underwent examinations with a physician and physiotherapist, and a total of 334 individuals were diagnosed with either neuropathic pain (n = 34), osteoarthritis (n = 78), or spinal pain (n = 222). Results showed that catastrophizing was significantly associated with reduced psychological and physical function, explaining 24% and 2% of the variance respectively, whereas catastrophizing as well as perceived solicitous responding were significantly and uniquely associated with insomnia severity, explaining 8% of the variance. Perceived solicitous responding was significantly negatively associated with insomnia severity. Moderator analyses indicated that: 1) the association between catastrophizing and psychological function was greater among individuals with spinal pain and neuropathic pain than those with osteoarthritis, and 2) the association between catastrophizing and insomnia was greater among individuals with spinal pain and osteoarthritis than those with neuropathic pain. No statistically significant interactions including perceived solicitous responses were found. The findings support earlier findings of an association between catastrophizing and function among individuals with chronic pain in the general population, and suggest that diagnosis may serve a moderating role in some of these associations. Perspective When examining persons with pain in the general population, catastrophizing is associated with several aspects of function, and diagnosis serves as a moderator for these associations. The replication of these associations in the general population support their reliability and generalizability.