1. YAG thermal barrier coatings deposited by suspension and solution precursor thermal spray
- Author
-
Tunji Adetayo Owoseni, Z. Pala, Tanvir Hussain, David M. Grant, A. Rincon Romero, Edward Lester, and F. Venturi
- Subjects
010302 applied physics ,Materials science ,Process Chemistry and Technology ,02 engineering and technology ,Temperature cycling ,021001 nanoscience & nanotechnology ,Microstructure ,01 natural sciences ,Surfaces, Coatings and Films ,Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials ,Thermal barrier coating ,chemistry.chemical_compound ,chemistry ,Yttrium aluminium garnet ,0103 physical sciences ,Materials Chemistry ,Ceramics and Composites ,Composite material ,0210 nano-technology ,Thermal spraying ,Suspension (vehicle) ,Stoichiometry ,Perovskite (structure) - Abstract
Yttrium aluminium garnet (YAG) is a promising topcoat material for thermal barrier coatings due to its high temperature stability and better CMAS (calcium-magnesium-alumino-silicate) resistance. YAG topcoats were deposited by suspension and solution precursor high-velocity oxy-fuel (HVOF) thermal spray. The relationships between processing, microstructure and final properties were studied through a range of characterization techniques and thermal cycling tests. The microstructure of the as-sprayed YAG topcoat from stoichiometric solution precursor (SP-YAG) had distributed pores and inter-splat boundaries, while the as-sprayed topcoat produced from suspension (S-YAG) had vertical and branched micro cracks, pores, and inter-splat boundaries. Both as-sprayed coatings were composed of amorphous phase, hexagonal yttrium aluminium perovskite (YAP) and cubic YAG. In thermal cycling tests, 20% of SP-YAG failure was reached after the 10th cycle; whereas, S-YAG reached the failure criteria between the 60th and 70th cycle. The failure of both the SP-YAG and the S-YAG topcoats occurred due to thermal stresses during the thermal cycling.
- Published
- 2021