Search

Purpose To report the clinical outcomes of glaucoma management in patients with phacomatosis pigmentovascularis (PPV) treated over a period of 3 decades. Design Retrospective cohort study. Participants Fifty-five eyes of 38 patients (21 unilateral and 17 bilateral) with glaucoma in PPV managed at one institution between January 1990 and December 2019 with a minimum follow-up of 1 year. Methods Medical records of children with glaucoma in PPV were reviewed, and demographic and clinical data were collected. Surgical interventions included primary combined trabeculotomy-trabeculectomy (CTT), trabeculectomy with mitomycin C (MMC), and transscleral cyclophotocoagulation (TSCPC). Complete success was defined as intraocular pressure (IOP) ≥ 6 and ≤ 16 mmHg without medications and qualified success as IOP ≤ 16 mmHg with the use of up to 2 medications. Main Outcome Measures Intraocular pressure, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), corneal clarity, antiglaucoma medications at preoperative and postoperative visits (last visit), and complications. Results Median age was 4 months (range, 0.2–252 months) at the time of glaucoma surgery. Thirty-nine eyes (74%) had primary CTT, 10 eyes (19%) had trabeculectomy with MMC, and 4 eyes (7%) with advanced glaucoma had TSCPC. Two eyes (3.6%) received medical treatment. Preoperative IOP reduced from a mean of 25.7 ± 8.4 mmHg on 0.8 ± 0.6 medications to 14.6 ± 5.2 mmHg on 0.4 ± 0.5 medications (P 20/40. Four of 10 eyes that underwent trabeculectomy with MMC developed retinal detachment and were managed surgically; however, all of these eyes had poor visual outcomes. There was no incidence of bleb leakage, bleb-related infection, or endophthalmitis. Conclusions Combined trabeculotomy-trabeculectomy is safe and effective as a primary procedure for management of glaucoma in PPV. Trabeculectomy augmented with MMC as a second procedure was associated with a higher rate of complications.

Background The Patient-Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) is a widely used screening instrument for depression. Recently, its properties as a measure were investigated using Rasch analysis in an Australian population with visual impairment (VI) and it was demonstrated to possess excellent measurement properties, but the response scale required shortening (modified PHQ-9). However, further validation was recommended to substantiate its use with the growing population of VI. Therefore, we aimed to use Rasch analysis to evaluate the measurement properties of the modified PHQ-9 in an Indian population with VI. Methods 303 patients with VI (mean age 40.2 years; 71% male) referred to Vision Rehabilitation Centres were administered the PHQ-9 by trained interviewer. Rasch analysis was used to investigate the psychometric properties of the modified PHQ-9. Results Rasch analysis showed good fit to the model, no misfitting items and an acceptable person separation reliability (0.82). Dimensionality testing supported combining 9 items to create a total score. Targeting was sub-optimal (−1.30 logits); more difficult items are needed. One item (‘trouble falling asleep’) showed notable differential item functioning, DIF (1.18 logits) by duration of VI. Limitations The generalisability of these results might be restricted to patients with VI presenting to a tertiary eye care centre. Conclusions Except for DIF, the performance of the modified PHQ-9 is consistent with that of the original, albeit in a different cultural context (Indian population with VI). Clinicians/researchers can readily use the modified PHQ-9 without formal training in Rasch procedures given the provision of ready-to-use spreadsheets that convert raw to Rasch-scaled scores. However the conversions will apply only if the sample being tested is similar to that of the present study.

PurPose: The Adaptation to Age-related Vision Loss (AVL) scale was developed to measure the adjustment of older adults who are adapting to late-life vision loss. The purpose of this study was to assess whether the AVL scale satisfies the Rasch model in a cataract population. Methods: The 24-item AVL scale (18 negatively and 6 positively coded) was mailed to 436 cataract patients for self-administration whilst they were on the waiting list for cataract surgery at the Flinders Eye Centre, Adelaide, South Australia. Rasch analysis was performed to determine whether the items were measuring a single construct (unidimensionality) as examined with fit statistics and principal components analysis (PCA) of the residuals. The ability of the scale to distinguish between the levels of adaptation of the participants (person separation) was investigated, with a value ≥ 2.0 established as the minimum acceptable. results: The AVL scale was unable to differentiate sufficiently between participants’ levels of adaptation, indicating poor person separation. One item did not fit the construct, causing misfit. Furthermore, the five positively worded items did not appear either to measure the same construct as other items, resulting in lack of unidimensionality evidenced by PCA. Following the deletion of these items, the AVL scale was one-dimensional but a single item continued to misfit, so it had to be deleted, resulting in an 18-item AVL scale. Even so, the discriminating abilities of the scale continued to be poor. ConClusions: The AVL scale is not an appropriate measure of adaptation to vision loss in a cataract population. (J Optom 2009;2:142-147 ©2009 Spanish Council of Optometry)