Search

Objectives Quantify the burden of central nervous system (CNS) metastases on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and healthcare resource use (HRU) in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) from a prospective European study in clinical practice, utilising clinical trial inclusion criteria. Materials and Methods Patients ≥18 years, with metastatic NSCLC, Eastern Oncology C0operative Group (ECOG) performance status 0–2 and life expectancy ≥12 weeks were enrolled in two cohorts by baseline CNS metastases status. Demographics, clinical characteristics, NSCLC management data, HRQoL and HRU were collected at baseline and two follow-up visits (Visits 2 and 3, 6 weeks apart). HRQoL was assessed using validated questionnaires. Results 162 patients were enrolled (n = 80 CNS cohort, n = 82 non-CNS cohort). Baseline characteristics were balanced, but CNS patients were younger (mean ± standard deviation age: 62.1 ± 9.6 vs 65.6 ± 9.7 years, p = 0.021) with a lower body mass index (13.8 % underweight [ Conclusion These data from clinical practice show minor differences in HRQoL/HRU between patients with advanced NSCLC with/without CNS metastases when applying selected clinical trial criteria. Although follow-up was short, HRQoL scores were similar between cohorts at all visits, supporting the wider inclusion of selected patients with CNS disease into clinical trials.

Background The ALEX study demonstrated significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) with alectinib versus crizotinib in treatment-naive ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) at the primary data cut-off (9 February 2017). We report mature PFS (cut-off: 30 November 2018) and overall survival (OS) data up to 5 years (cut-off: 29 November 2019). Patients and methods Patients with stage III/IV ALK-positive NSCLC were randomized to receive twice-daily alectinib 600 mg (n = 152) or crizotinib 250 mg (n = 151) until disease progression, toxicity, withdrawal or death. Primary end point: investigator-assessed PFS. Secondary end points included objective response rate, OS and safety. Results Mature PFS data showed significantly prolonged investigator-assessed PFS with alectinib [hazard ratio (HR) 0.43, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.32–0.58; median PFS 34.8 versus 10.9 months crizotinib]. Median duration of OS follow-up: 48.2 months alectinib, 23.3 months crizotinib. OS data remain immature (37% of events). Median OS was not reached with alectinib versus 57.4 months with crizotinib (stratified HR 0.67, 95% CI 0.46–0.98). The 5-year OS rate was 62.5% (95% CI 54.3–70.8) with alectinib and 45.5% (95% CI 33.6–57.4) with crizotinib, with 34.9% and 8.6% of patients still on study treatment, respectively. The OS benefit of alectinib was seen in patients with central nervous system metastases at baseline [HR 0.58 (95% CI 0.34–1.00)] and those without [HR 0.76 (95% CI 0.45–1.26)]. Median treatment duration was longer with alectinib (28.1 versus 10.8 months), and no new safety signals were observed. Conclusions Mature PFS data from ALEX confirmed significant improvement in PFS for alectinib over crizotinib in ALK-positive NSCLC. OS data remain immature, with a higher 5-year OS rate with alectinib versus crizotinib. This is the first global randomized study to show clinically meaningful improvement in OS for a next-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor versus crizotinib in treatment-naive ALK-positive NSCLC. Clinical trials number NCT02075840.

Background ALK inhibitors (ALKi) have shown substantial benefit in pts with advanced ALK+ NSCLC. We describe real-world treatment patterns and outcomes in pts with ALK+ advanced NSCLC in the US. Methods This retrospective cohort study utilised US electronic health record data from Flatiron Health. Pts diagnosed with stage IIIB-IV ALK+ NSCLC from 1 Jan 2011 to 30 Sep 2018 were included. Treatment patterns and outcomes (real-world progression-free survival [rwPFS] and overall survival [OS]) were extracted for first- or second-line therapy. Time to treatment discontinuation (TTTD) was used as a surrogate for real-world treatment duration accounting for treatment beyond progression. Time-to-event analyses were performed using Kaplan-Meier methods. Results Data were available for 620 pts with ALK+ advanced NSCLC. An ALKi was given to 420/620 (67.7%) pts as first-line therapy and 273/359 (76.0%) pts who received second-line therapy. Among non-ALKi treatments, platinum-based regimens were the most common. Crizotinib was the preferred first-line ALKi up to 2016, and then alectinib. As second-line therapy, crizotinib was the preferred ALKi up to 2013, followed by ceritinib from 2014–2015, and then alectinib to the end of the follow-up period. TTTD, rwPFS and OS were longest with alectinib, followed by crizotinib and non-ALKi (Table). Conclusions The use of ALKi in the US reflects current clinical guidelines. Despite the choice and established benefit of individual ALKi as first-line therapy, more than 25% of pts received a non-ALKi as first-line therapy, even in recent years (2017/2018). Furthermore, in clinical practice, treatment beyond progression with an ALKi is relatively common. OS for non-ALKi was comparable to some ALKi, but OS is also reflective of treatment received in later lines of therapy. Table . 1546P 1L Outcome Statistics Alectinib (n = 98) Ceritinib (n = 4) Crizotinib (n = 318) non-ALKi (n = 200) rwPFS Median (95% CI), months NR 5.06 (0.72, NR) 6.41 (5.92, 8.16) 8.26 (6.25, 9.9) 6-month probability (95% CI) 0.83 (0.75, 0.91) 0.5 (0.19, 1) 0.55 (0.49, 0.6) 0.59 (0.52, 0.66) 12-month probability (95% CI) 0.68 (0.58, 0.79) 0.25 (0.05, 1) 0.32 (0.27, 0.38) 0.37 (0.3, 0.44) TTTD Median (95% CI), months NR 6.1 (0.72, NR) 7.57 (6.97, 9.14) 3.12 (2.76, 4.38) 6-month probability (95% CI) 0.85 (0.78, 0.92) 0.5 (0.19, 1) 0.61 (0.56, 0.67) 0.35 (0.29, 0.43) 12-month probability (95% CI) 0.73 (0.64, 0.84) 0.25 (0.05, 1) 0.36 (0.31, 0.42) 0.21 (0.16, 0.28) OS Median (95% CI), months NR 6.1 (0.72, NR) 23.06 (16.51, 30.86) 27.99 (21.6, 36.51) 6-month probability (95% CI) 0.92 (0.87, 0.98) 0.5 (0.19, 1) 0.78 (0.73, 0.82) 0.84 (0.79, 0.89) 12-month probability (95% CI) 0.85 (0.77, 0.93) 0.25 (0.05, 1) 0.65 (0.6, 0.7) 0.71 (0.65, 0.78) 2L Outcome Statistics Alectinib (n = 90) Ceritinib (n = 75) Crizotinib (n = 97) non-ALKi (n = 86) rwPFS Median (95% CI), months 13.59 (10.33, NR) 6.32 (4.64, 8.45) 6.88 (4.9, 9.87) 4.4 (2.96, 6.81) 6-month probability (95% CI) 0.76 (0.68, 0.86) 0.51 (0.4, 0.64) 0.54 (0.45, 0.65) 0.4 (0.31, 0.52) 12-month probability (95% CI) 0.55 (0.44, 0.68) 0.25 (0.16, 0.37) 0.35 (0.26, 0.46) 0.22 (0.14, 0.33) TTTD Median (95% CI), months 19.84 (14.54, NR) 8.19 (6.22, 11.84) 8.72 (7.37, 5.36) 4.61 (3.42, 6.18) 6-month probability (95% CI) 0.85 (0.77, 0.93) 0.61 (0.5, 0.73) 0.66 (0.57, 0.76) 0.39 (0.3, 0.51) 12-month probability (95% CI) 0.68 (0.58, 0.8) 0.34 (0.24, 0.47) 0.41 (0.32, 0.52) 0.18 (0.11, 0.28) OS Median (95% CI), months NR 16.84 (9.51, 33.75) 22.3 (17.17, 45.23) 15.56 (11.41, 26.94) 6-month probability (95% CI) 0.92 (0.86, 0.98) 0.75 (0.65, 0.86) 0.85 (0.78, 0.93) 0.71 (0.62, 0.82) 12-month probability (95% CI) 0.85 (0.77, 0.93) 0.59 (0.48, 0.71) 0.69 (0.6, 0.79) 0.56 (0.46, 0.68) 1L, first-line therapy; 2L, second-line therapy; ALKi, ALK inhibitor; rwPFS, real-world progression-free survival; TTTD, time to treatment discontinuation; OS, overall survival; NR, not reached (median survival estimate could not be calculated). Editorial acknowledgement Nicola Griffin of Gardiner-Caldwell Communications, funded by F. Hoffmann-La Roche. Legal entity responsible for the study F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. Funding F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. Disclosure M.G. Krebs: Advisory / Consultancy: Achilles Therapeutics, Janssen, Octmet and Roche; Research grant / Funding (self): BerGenBio and Roche; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: AstraZeneca and BerGenBio; Research grant / Funding (institution): AstraZeneca, Bayer, BerGenBio, Blueprint, Carrick, Immutep, Incyte, Janssen, Merck, Octimet and Roche. L. Polito: Full / Part-time employment: F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. V. Smoljanovic: Full / Part-time employment: F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. H. Trinh: Full / Part-time employment: Genentech Inc. G. Crane: Full / Part-time employment: Genentech Inc.

Background We report mature PFS, updated OS and safety data from the global phase III ALEX study (NCT02075840) of ALC vs CRZ in patients (pts) with untreated ALK+ NSCLC after a further 12 months (m) of follow-up (cutoff date: 30 Nov 2018). Methods Eligible pts had stage IIIB/IV ALK+ NSCLC (by central IHC), ECOG PS 0–2 and no prior systemic therapy for advanced NSCLC. Asymptomatic CNS metastases (mets) were allowed. Pts were randomised 1:1 to twice-daily ALC 600mg (n = 152) or CRZ 250mg (n = 151). Primary endpoint: investigator (INV)-assessed PFS (RECIST v1.1), with q8w CNS imaging in all pts. Results Mature, median INV-assessed PFS: 34.8 m (95% CI 17.7–NR) ALC vs 10.9 m (95% CI 9.1–12.9) CRZ (ITT stratified HR 0.43, 95% CI 0.32–0.58; p Conclusions This final updated PFS analysis confirms the superior efficacy and favourable tolerability of ALC compared with CRZ in pts with untreated ALK+ NSCLC. OS data remain immature (stratified HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.47–1.02), with a 4-year OS rate of 64.5% (95% CI 55.6–73.4) with ALC. Table . 1484PD PFS event-free rate, % (95% CI) OS event-free rate, % (95% CI) ALC (n = 152) CRZ (n = 151) ALC (n = 152) CRZ (n = 151) Duration (years) Overall Baseline CNS mets Overall Baseline CNS mets Overall Overall Yes No Yes No 1 67.8 (60.3–75.3) 58.5 74.5 48.0 (39.7–56.2) 32.5 57.2 84.3 (78.4–90.2) 82.5 (76.1–88.9) 2 56.6 (48.6–64.6) 52.0 59.8 24.8 (17.6–32.1) 6.3 35.7 72.5 (65.1–79.9) 65.1 (56.7–73.4) 3 46.4 (38.2–54.5) 40.5 50.6 13.5 (7.7–19.3) 2.1 20.2 66.9 (59.0–74.8) 56.7 (47.8–65.6) 4 43.7 (35.4–51.9) 38.0 47.6 NE (NE–NE) NE NE 64.5 (55.6–73.4) 52.2 (42.6–61.8) NE, not estimable Clinical trial identification NCT02075840. Editorial acknowledgement Nicola Griffin of Gardiner-Caldwell Communications; funded by F. Hoffmann-La Roche. Legal entity responsible for the study F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. Funding F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. Disclosure T.S.K. Mok: Leadership role: Sanonics Ltd.; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy: ACEA Biosciences, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Chimed, Cirina, Fishawack Facilitate, Ignyta, Janssen, Lilly, Merck Serono, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, OncoGenex, Pfizer, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd/Genentech, SFJ Pharm; Research grant / Funding (self): AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Clovis Oncology, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Pfizer, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, SFJ Pharmaceutical and XCovery. A.T. Shaw: Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy: F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Genentech, Pfizer, Novartis, Ariad, Ignyta, Daiichi-Sankyo, Taiho, Blueprint medicines, LOXO, EMD Serono and Foundation medicine. R.D. Camidge: Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy: AbbVie, Ariad, Array, Celgene, Clovis Oncology, Eli Lilly, Genoptix, G1 Therapeutics, Novartis, Orion, and F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd/Genentech. S.M. Gadgeel: Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy: Ariad, AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Pfizer and F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd/Genentech. R. Dziadziuszko: Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy: F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Pfizer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Clovis Oncology, Novartis, AstraZeneca and Tesaro. D. Kim: Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Pfizer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Clovis Oncology, Novartis, AstraZeneca and Tesaro; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Novartis Oncology; Research grant / Funding (institution): Alpha Biopharma, AstraZeneca/MedImmune, Hanmi, Janssen, Merus, Mirati Therapeutics, MSD, Novartis, ONO Pharmaceutical, Pfizer, Roche/Genentech, Takeda, TP Therapeutics, Xcovery and Yuhan. M. Perol: Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy: F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd/Genentech, Pfizer, Eli Lilly, Boehringer Ingelheim, Clovis Oncology, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Chugai, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Amgen, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, AstraZeneca, Takeda ; Research grant / Funding (institution): F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, AstraZeneca, Chugai and Takeda. S. Ou: Honoraria (self): ARIAD, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd/Genentech and TP Therapeutics; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: ARIAD, AstraZeneca and F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd/Genentech; Research grant / Funding (self): ARIAD, AstraZeneca, Daiichi Sankyo, Pfizer and F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd/Genentech; Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options: TP Therapeutics. W. Bordogna: Full / Part-time employment: F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. V. Smoljanovic: Full / Part-time employment: F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. M. Hilton: Full / Part-time employment: F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. S. Peters: Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (self): AbbVie, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Biocartis, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Clovis, Daiichi Sankyo, Debiopharm, Eli Lilly, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Foundation Medicine, Illumina, Janssen, Merck Sharp and Dohme, Merck Serono, Merrimack, Nova. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.