Search

Objective To investigate the long-term outcome of ileal ureteric replacement using a proximal antirefluxing technique for the treatment of long-segment ureteric strictures. Patients and methods Between January 1997 and December 2013, 41 patients with a long ureteral stricture or defect and 3 patients with unilateral mid-lower ureteral cancer (20 bilateral and 24 unilateral, 28 males and 16 females) were treated by ureteral substitution using a proximal antirefluxing technique. The distal part of the upper ureter (4 cm) was fixed between the psoas muscle and the ileal segment (the iliopsoas tunnel technique). The distal ileum was connected to the urinary bladder with an end-to-side anastomosis. A successful outcome was defined as the absence of major complications, worsening baseline renal function, metabolic derangements, or obstruction. Results One patient with unilateral mid-lower ureteral cancer died 3 years postoperatively because of metastasis, and the remaining 43 patients were followed for 12-180 months (mean 69 months). Intravenous urography showed that the hydronephrosis improved significantly or disappeared after 6-12 months in 34 patients, with improvement in 9 patients. Cystography showed no evidence of ileoureteral reflux. Seven patients needed long-term oral alkalization to prevent hyperchloremic acidosis. Conclusion In our experience, outcomes following subtotal ureteric replacement are encouraging. The ileal ureter replacement by the proximal antirefluxing technique appears to be a reliable procedure for treating long-segment ureteral stricture and preservation of renal function.

A one-step approach is employed to prepare an asymmetric cellulose acetate (CA) membrane that is used for total heat recovery (heat and moisture recovery). The process only involves a cheap raw material of CA, an environmental friendly solvent acetic acid and an additive deionized water. A porous support layer and a dense skin layer are formed simultaneously during the solvent and coagulant medium exchange. Investigations found that the approach is successful in making membranes for heat and moisture recovery. The new membranes have high moisture permeability. Moreover, the permeation of other unwanted gases like CO2 is effectively prohibited. Analysis found that the optimum solution compositions for casting membranes are: acetic acid to deionized water ratio 70:30. The approach provides an environmental friendly yet economical solution for preparing membranes for heat and moisture recovery.

Objectives We evaluated the efficacy of bulbourethral composite sling procedure in the treatment of male urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy, transurethral resection of the prostate, or prostatic enucleation for benign prostatic hyperplasia, and posterior urethroplasty. Methods Between May 2000 and April 2005, a bulbourethral composite sling was performed in 26 patients with acquired urinary incontinence. Eight (30.8%) of these patients had severe urinary incontinence, and 18 (69.2%) had mild to moderate urinary incontinence. A polyester patch plus tension-free vaginal tape (TVT) device was used in the procedure. Prolene threads were attached to the two ends of polyester taper then passed from the perineal incision to a suprapubic incision with a TVT needle. The ends of the sutures and TVT were tied over the rectus fascia in the midline after repeated urethral pressure measurements reached 80–90cmH 2 O. Results The follow-up period was 8–54 mo (mean: 28.3). The primary procedure failed in one patient. Of the remaining 25 patients, 1 patient died of cerebral hemorrhage 2 yr postoperatively, and 2 patients had recurrent stress incontinence in 1.5 and 2 yr postsurgery, respectively. The recurrent incontinence was severe in one patient and mild (one to two pads per day) in the other. The remaining 22 patients maintained urination and continence. The total success rate (cure and improved) was 92% (23 of 25). Conclusions Bulbourethral composite sling procedure is a minimally invasive, safe, effective surgical option in the treatment of male patients with mild to moderate incontinence, but is not suitable for severe incontinence. Temporary perineal discomfort or pain is a common complication of the procedure.