Search

Objectives This study sought to investigate the factors associated with repeat infection following lead extraction procedures. Background Although lead extraction is an essential therapy for patients with cardiovascular implantable electronic device (CIED) infection, repeat infection still occurs in some patients. Methods The authors reviewed data for consecutive patients who underwent extraction of infected CIEDs from August 2003 to May 2019. Repeat infection was defined as infective endocarditis, sepsis with no alternative focus, or pocket infection after extraction of infected CIEDs. Results Extraction of infected CIEDs was performed in 496 patients. The most commonly implicated pathogen was Staphylococcus aureus (n = 188). In 449 patients (90.5%), all leads were completely extracted using only transvenous techniques. Thirty-three patients (6.7%) underwent surgical lead extraction, and 14 (2.8%) had retained leads or lead components. After a median follow-up of 352 [40 to 1,255] days after CIED extraction, 144 patients (29.0%) died. Repeat infection occurred in 47 patients (9.5%) with the median time from the extraction to repeat infection of 103 [45 to 214] days. In multivariable analysis, presence of a left ventricular assist device, younger age at extraction, and S. aureus infection were independent predictors of repeat infection. Additionally, chronic kidney disease, congestive heart failure, presence of septic emboli, S. aureus infection, and occurrence of major complications were independent predictors of increased mortality. Conclusions Patients with S. aureus infection have a high risk of repeat infection and poor prognosis after CIED extraction. Repeat infection is also predicted by younger age and the presence of a left ventricular assist device, whereas mortality was predicted by congestive heart failure, chronic kidney disease, and septic emboli.

This study sought to define the association between conduction recovery across the cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) and typical atrial flutter (AFL) recurrence when CTI ablation is performed with pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) compared with a stand-alone procedure.CTI ablation is commonly performed at the same time as PVI to treat AFL or as an empiric therapy. Conduction recovery is a recognized problem after linear ablation in the left atrium (e.g., mitral isthmus ablation) and is proarrhythmic. Less is known about conduction recovery after CTI ablation and possible differences in outcomes when performed at the time of PVI compared with at the time of a stand-alone procedure.Eligible participants who underwent stand-alone CTI ablation were compared with those who underwent a combined (CTI+PVI) procedure. CTI conduction recovery was assessed at the time of a second ablation. Conduction recovery across the CTI (primary outcome) and recurrence of typical AFL (secondary outcome) were studied using multivariable logistic regression.Among 295 eligible participants (median age: 64 years [interquartile range: 55 to 69 years]; 33% women), recovery was assessed in 232 and was more common after combined versus stand-alone CTI ablation (52% [72 of 139] vs. 13% [12 of 93]; p 0.001). In multivariable analysis, CTI ablation performed as a combined procedure increased odds of CTI conduction recovery 7.8-fold (odds ratio: 7.8; 95% confidence interval: 3.3 to 18.3; p 0.001) and clinical AFL recurrence 4.1-fold (odds ratio: 4.1; 95% confidence interval: 1.0 to 16.9; p = 0.049).CTI ablation performed at the time of atrial fibrillation ablation is associated with higher rates of conduction recovery and typical flutter recurrence.

Background Disturbing trends regarding the sex, age, and race of gunshot victims have been reported in previous national studies; however, gunshot trends have not been well documented in individual cities in the southeastern United States. Objectives 1) Analyze trends in gunshot wounds, particularly the association between gunshot wounds and race, among victims presenting to a Level I Trauma Center in Middle Tennessee; 2) Compare specific characteristics of gunshot victims to the general Emergency Department (ED) population. Methods This is a retrospective cohort study of 343,866 ED visits from 2004 to 2009. Results Compared to the general ED population, gunshot victims were more predominantly male (87.5% vs. 43.4%), black (57.6% vs. 29.5%), younger (47.8% under age 25 years vs. 31.6%), and demonstrated higher Medicaid enrollment (78.6% vs. 44.7%). The majority of black gunshot victims were aged 18–25 years (47.1%) and victims of assault (65.9%). Non-black gunshot victims suffered more unintentional (40.2% vs. 28.2%) and self-inflicted (9.1% vs. 0.4%) injuries and were more evenly distributed among ages 18–55 years. Black patients were 3.03 (95% confidence interval 2.93–3.14) times more likely to present to this ED for gunshot wounds than non-black patients, after controlling for age, sex, and insurance status ( p Conclusions Our study demonstrates that black patients between 18 and 25 years of age presenting to this trauma center are more likely to be victims of gun violence than their non-black counterparts. Our study evaluates trends in gun violence in the Southeast, particularly in relation to race, age, and insurance status.

The evolution of high throughput sequencing technologies has facilitated the rapid expansion of genetic testing in individuals with suspected heritable forms of cardiomyopathy. It is challenging to determine the pathogenicity of rare DNA variants in the absence of large kindreds that allow