Search

Background: Multi-country studies assessing the quality of maternal and newborn care (QMNC) during the COVID-19 pandemic, as defined by WHO Standards, are lacking.Methods Women who gave birth in 12 countries of the WHO European Region from March 1, 2020 to March 15, 2021 answered an online questionnaire, including 40 WHO Standard-based quality measures. Findings: 21,027 women were included in the analysis. Among those who experienced labour (N=18,063), 49·9% (37·2%-60·7%) perceived a reduction in QMNC due to the COVID-19 pandemic, 41·8% (26·1%- 63·5%) experienced difficulties in accessing antenatal care, 62% (12·6%-99·0%) were not allowed a companion of choice, 31·1% (16·5%-56·9%) received inadequate breastfeeding support, 34·4% (5·2%-64·8%) reported health workers not always using protective personal equipment, and 31·8% (17·8%-53·1%) rated the number of health workers as “insufficient”. Episiotomy was performed in 20·1% (6·1%-66·0%) of spontaneous vaginal births and fundal pressure applied in 41·2% (11·5% -100%) of instrumental vaginal births. In addition, 23·9% women felt they were not treated with dignity (12·8%-59·8%), 12·5% (7·0%-23·4%) suffered abuse, and 2·4% (0·1%-26·2%) made informal payments. Findings were significantly worst among women with elective caesarean (CS) and emergency CS during labour (N=2,964). Multivariate analyses confirmed significant differences among countries, with Croatia, Romania, Serbia showing significant lower QMNC Indexes; younger women and those with operative births also had significant lower QMNC Indexes. Interpretation: Findings reveal large inequities in the QMNC across countries of the WHO European Region. Actions to reduce these inequities and promote high-quality, evidence-based, patient-centred respectful care for all mothers and newborns are urgently needed. Trial Registration: Study registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04847336. Funding: The study was financially supported by the Institute for Maternal and Child Health IRCCS Burlo Garofolo, Trieste, Italy. Declaration of Interest: None to declare. Ethical Approval: The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the coordinating centre: the IRCCS Burlo Garofolo Trieste (IRB-BURLO 05/2020 15.07.2020). The study protocol was also reviewed and approved by the ethical committees of three other countries to comply with local regulations: Portugal (Instituto de Saude Publica da Universidade do Porto, CE20159); Norway (Norwegian Regional Committee for Medical Research Ethics, 2020/213047) and Germany (Bielefeld University ethics committee, 2020-176).

Objective this article argues that rhetorical skills are an important quality factor of midwifery care. In particular, it aims to identify and discuss the relevance of three classical means of persuasion: ethos , pathos and logos . Design secondary analysis, rhetorical analysis of semi-structured interviews. Setting Slovenia. Interviews were carried out predominantly in 2006. Data refer to childbirths in 2005 and 2006. Participants four women with recent experience of childbirth. Findings analysis identified the presence of all three means of persuasion in the interaction between midwives and women. Focusing on midwives, the quality of their awareness and command of rhetorical skills remains questionable. In particular, women experienced lack of a rational account of the situation and decisions made by health-care professionals involved in maternity care. Key conclusions acknowledging professional ethics, awareness and good command of all three means of persuasion [but above all, argumentative persuasion ( logos )] is an integral component of midwifery care. It can contribute to collaborative relations between midwives and women, and thus promote women-centred midwifery care. Implications for practice knowledge of the three classical rhetorical means of persuasion should be integrated into professional midwifery curricula.