1. Establishing a community pharmacy-based fall prevention service – An implementation study
- Author
-
Gemmeke, Marle, Koster, Ellen, van der Velde, Nathalie, Taxis, Katja, Bouvy, Marcel, Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, Afd Pharmacoepi & Clinical Pharmacology, Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, and Afd Pharmacoepi & Clinical Pharmacology
- Subjects
Pharmacies ,Attitude of Health Personnel ,Pharmaceutical Science ,Community Pharmacy Services ,Pharmacy ,Pharmacists ,Professional Role ,Elderly ,Implementation ,Fall risk-increasing drugs ,Humans ,Accidental Falls ,Fall prevention ,Community pharmacy - Abstract
Background: Community pharmacists are in the position to contribute to fall prevention, but this is not yet common practice. Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the implementation of a community pharmacy-based fall prevention service. Methods: A fall prevention service, consisting of a fall risk screening and assessment including a medication review, was implemented in pharmacies during three months. A preparative online training was provided to the pharmacy team to enhance adoption of the service. Included patients were aged ≥70 years, using ≥5 drugs of which ≥1 fall risk-increasing drug. The implementation process was quantitively assessed by registering medication adaptations, recommendations, and referrals. Changes in patient scores on the Short Fall Efficacy Scale-International (FES-I) and a fall prevention knowledge test were documented at one month follow-up. Implementation was qualitatively evaluated by conducting semi-structured interviews with pharmacists before and after the project, based on the consolidated framework of implementation research. Results: The service was implemented in nine pharmacies and 91 consultations were performed. Medication was adapted of 32 patients. Patients' short FES-I scores were significantly higher at follow-up (p = 0.047) and patients’ knowledge test scores did not differ (p = 0.86). Pharmacists experienced the following barriers: lack of time, absence of staff, and limited multidisciplinary collaboration. Facilitators were training, motivated staff, patient engagement, and project scheduling. Conclusion: The service resulted in a substantial number of medication adaptations and lifestyle recommendations, but many barriers were identified that hamper the sustained implementation of the service.
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF