Search

Background: Domino or sequential liver transplantation (DTXL) is a kind of living donor transplant, which was proposed in 1993 and performed for the first time in 1995; later on, more than 45 have been reported. The liver from a patient with familial amyloidotic polyneuropathy(FAP) is used to another patient aged more than 60 with hepatic disease generally cancer, because FAP livers are anatomically and functionally normal except for the synthesis of the systemic TTR variant which only could generate FAP in the recipient after more than 8 years., Patients and Method: The three first cases of DTXL performed in Spain are presented. The donors were FAPTTRMet30 patients from the Major can focus. The first recipient showed severe hyperinsulinism due to metastatic liver from malignant insulinoma; the others had hepatocellular carcinoma on a cirrhotic liver., Results: During the post operatory period liver function of recipients was perfect,and hyperinsulinism disappeared in the first; this patient died after 10 days by sepsis whereas the others showed normal liver function, no recurrent cancer nor onset of FAP. The donors outcome was normal with perfect liver function., Conclusions: Based on our results, in agreement with previous reports, we conclude that DTXH is valid procedure for a selected patient group. In addition they increase the pool of liver donors and therefore diminish the overloaded waiting lists.

Background: We present the experience of the liver transplantation program at the Hospital of Bellvitge with 500 transplantations performed during 15 years, to describe changes in liver transplantation observed throughout the time and to analyze the long term results., Patients and Method: Five groups each one including 100 consecutive transplantations are studied., Results: The main indications were hepatocellular carcinoma (23%), alcoholic cirrhosis (22.8%), and post-hepatitis C cirrhosis (18.8%). Sixty-five retransplantations were performed in 59 patients (13%), being the more frequent indications arterial thrombosis (13 patients) and primary nonfunction of graft (10 patients). In 10 patients a hepatorenal transplantation was performed. In group I, the most frequent donor cause of death was cranial traumatism (80%), while in group V it was the vascular pathology (52%). There were other significative differences between these groups of patients (I vs V): patients with stage 2 or 3 from UNOS status (45 vs 19%), blood use (29.6 [26] vs 4.6 [5.3] PRBC), ICU stay (13 [13] vs 7.4 [11] days), hospital stay (40 [52] vs 23.7 [17] days), rejection rate (46 vs 20%) and primary graft nonfunction (9 vs 3%). However, the infection rates (48 vs 54.5%) and biliary tract complications (26 vs 20%) have not shown statistically significant differences. Actuarial one and 5-year survival are 83 and 70% respectively., Conclusions: An important and progressive improvement of liver transplantation results has been observed. However, de novo tumours, hepatitis C virus recurrence and chronic rejection can limit long term results.

Introduction: Liver retransplantation is the only alternative to irreversible graft failure. However, it remains a controversial treatment. The aim of this study was to analyze the clinical course and the results of liver retransplantation in our center., Patients and Methods: The actuarial survival in a series of 54 retransplantations in 49 patients between February 1984 and December 1997 was analyzed. The retransplantations were grouped according to period: group A (n = 16) 1984-1992, group B (n = 22) 1993-1995 and group C (n = 16) 1996-1997., Results: The actuarial survival per group according to year was: 31.25%, 54.55% and 62.50% for groups A, B, and C, respectively, which shows a clear improvement with time, although differences were not statistically significant., Conclusions: The results of liver transplantation in our series show a lower actuarial survival rate than those of primary transplantation but these results have improved in recent years.

Introduction: Orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) is the only curative treatment for hepatic cirrhosis and is the most effective in the control of portal hypertension. The aim of this study was to analyze whether greater morbi-mortality is observed in patients undergoing liver transplantation with previous surgery for portal hypertension with respect to patients not having undergone this surgery., Materials and Methods: Different variables were analyzed in 2 groups of transplanted patients: one of 18 patients who had previously undergone surgery for portal hypertension and another group of 54 patients without this previous surgery., Results: The following factors were studied: mean operative time and length of anahepatic phase, intraoperative consumption of concentrates of erythrocytes, fresh frozen plasma, units of platelets and cryoprecipitates, days of mechanical ventilation, stay in the ICU and total postoperative stay. No significant differences were observed (p < 0.05) in any of these factors or in survival., Discussion: On analysis of the difficulty of surgical technique, postoperative evolution and survival and based on the variables described it may be concluded that previous surgery for portal hypertension does not only not contraindicate posterior liver transplantation, but rather may be useful in patients with an adequate hepative reserve presenting variceal hemorrhage since posterior transplantation does not present a worsened prognosis.

A retrospective analysis of our experience in the treatment of hiliary cholangiocarcinoma or Klatskin tumor was performed with the aim of evaluating the morbi-mortality and prognosis of its treatment to thereby determine the usefulness of the different therapeutic options. From 1989 to 1997, 51 patients diagnosed with hiliary cholangiocarcinoma were treated in our hospital. Surgery was indicated in 16 with curative aims (group I) while palliative treatment with percutaneous biliary drainage was indicated in 35 (group II). Biliary resection was carried out in 8 patients being associated with hepatic resection in 4 (group IA) and in 8 patients undergoing liver transplantation (group IB). Clinico-epidemiologic data and hospital stay were similar in all the groups. The frequency of complications was similar in groups I and II although the frequency of cholangitis (49%) in group II was noticeable. The percentage of readmissions was also greater in group II (12 vs 46%, respectively; p = 0.03) with prosthesis obstruction being the most frequent cause. Accumulated survival at 1, 2, and 3 years in group I was 84, 64 and 48% with a median survival of 33 months, while in group II the median survival was of 6 months with no patient surviving more than 2 years (p = 0.0001). When groups IA and IB were compared, greater frequency of complications in groups IA (100 vs 37%; p = 0.002), similar frequency of readmissions (87 vs 75%; p = NS), median survival greater in group IB (12.5 months vs 48 months) and significantly higher actuarial survival in group IB (48% in 2 years vs 83% to 2 years; p = 0.02) was observed. In conclusion, surgery is the treatment of choice in hiliary cholangiocarcinoma whenever possible, given the greater survival without a significant increase in morbimortality. Likewise, we consider that liver transplantation is a useful option in the treatment of patients with cholangiocarcinoma type IV of Bismuth.

Background: Adenosine deaminase (ADA) is an essential enzyme for the differentiation and proliferation of T lymphocytes and the monocyte-macrophage system. The basic immunitary response of brucellosis is cellular. To this end, ADA activity was evaluated in brucellosis., Methods: Serum ADA activity was assessed by a colorimetric method in 67 patients with brucellosis, before therapy and at 1, 3 and 6 months of follow up., Results: Serum ADA activity in brucellosis was higher than that in 52 healthy controls, both in those with the acute febrile noncomplicated form (48 patients) and in those with focal symptoms from one organ (19 patients) (p less than 0.0001 and p less than 0.001). There were no differences between both groups of brucellosis. There was a negative correlation between the duration of the disease and ADA activity. After therapy there was a rapid decrease of ADA values, more marked in patients with noncomplicated brucellosis. During the follow up, only one patient had a new increase in ADA activity, coincident with a clinical and bacteriological relapse, and previous to the increase of IgG anti-Brucella titers., Conclusions: The results indicate that adenosine deaminase activity is increased during the active stage of brucellosis. It can be considered as a biochemical follow up marker of the disease and, probably, as a marker of relapses.