Search

Objective: To describe the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) in a series of severe traumatic brain injuries, their clinical and outcome features, and possible implications., Design: A descriptive, observational case-series study was carried out., Patients and Interventions: Patients with severe traumatic brain injuries (TBIs) admitted to the ICU were subjected to MRI study using a 1.5 T scanner. Diffusion-weighted images (DWMR) were obtained using the following echo-planar pulse sequence: TR 10000 ms, TE 126.9 ms, with b values 1000 s/mm2 in the three spatial dimensions. Combining the three sets of images, an isotropic image conforming a map of the mean ADCs was obtained., Results: DWMR was performed in 23 patients with severe TBI admitted to the ICU between 2001 and 2004. In the MR images we selected 26 regions of interest (ROIs) where ADC was recorded. We observed a clear increase in diffusion in non-treated space-occupying lesions versus other types of injuries and the normal values. A poorer outcome was recorded in patients with lower ADC values., Conclusions: Mean ADC in the lesions was greater than the normal values and greater in contusions than in other types of injuries, as an expression of extracellular edema. ADCs were decreased in patients with a poor outcome, suggesting an association between ischemia and the patient prognosis., (Copyright © 2011 Elsevier España, S.L. and SEMICYUC. All rights reserved.)

Unlabelled: The APACHE II system classified patients on the basis of the severity of their disease, while the groups related with the diagnosis (DRG) are classified according to the consumption of resources. Nonetheless, the relative DRG weight (RWDRG) may be related with severity given that the most severe patients are also usually the most expensive. The aims of the study were: 1) verify the ability of DRG to measure clinical severity and 2) compare the prognostic value of both systems., Methods: A transversal cut off was performed (316 consecutive admissions in intensive care units [ICU] with 23 exclusions due to unclear final evolution) with the patients being classified according to final hospital evolution in survivors and deaths. Each patient was given an APACHE II score corresponding to the first 24 hours in the ICU. Parallelly the cases were grouped in the corresponding DRG in accordance with the CIE-9-MC codification of their discharge report. The comparison of the means was carried out with the Student's t test, with the determination of prognostic values being performed by discriminant analysis., Results: The survivors had an APACHE II score of 9.5 +/- 5.5 and the deaths of 22.5 +/- 7.8 (p < 0.0001). The RWDRG of the survivors was 1.4 +/- 0.9 and that of the deaths of 2.0 +/- 1.0 (p < 0.0001). On inclusion of all the patients the APACHE II prognostic value was 85.3% and the RWDRG 68.9% and both 84.6%. In the group of patients with a RWDRG lower than 1.6 the prognostic value of the APACHE II was of 87.6% and the RGRDW 72.0% and both 90%. In the group with RWDRG greater than 1.6 the prognostic value of the APACHE II was 85.1%, the RWDRG 73.0% and both 83.2%., Conclusions: The system of the groups related with diagnosis indirectly measures clinical severity. APACHE II is significantly superior to the system of groups related with diagnosis with regard to prognostic value. The use of both systems together does not improve the prognostic value of APACHE II.

A case of lithiasis in a front diverticulum of the urethra in male is presented. The unusual presentation it had together with the lack of frequency was pointed out, commenting briefly the diagnostic methods and ways of treatment.

A case of renal angiosarcoma is presented. The extremely unusual frequency of this entity, its clinical and pathological features, and mode of presentation accompanied by intense intratumor hemorrhage, a unique finding compared to other cases of renal angiosarcoma thus far reported, have been highlighted.

We present 13 patients anatomopathologically diagnosed with xantogranulomatose pyelonephritis. This form of inflammatory reaction may give rise to major pre-operative diagnostic difficulties through being confused with renal neoplasias. Clinical evolution consists of long-developing lithiasis complicated with infection. We regard echography and C.A.T. as extremely useful elements both in accurate pre-operative diagnosis and in the locoregional evaluation of the lesion. Treatment is surgical and the prognosis is favourable.