Search

Introduction and Objective: Zika virus disease is a challenge for public health due to its rapid spread and potential foetal complications. Although it is imported in Spain, there is a risk of autochthonous transmission due to Aedes albopictus presence. Zika disease and congenital cases have been under surveillance since 2016. The objective of this study is to explore the epidemiology of disease and pregnancies result., Material and Methods: A descriptive study was carried out into cases reported to the National Surveillance Network (RENAVE) during the 30/11/2015 to 31/12/2017 period. The case definition and the survey are included in the RENAVE protocol. The variables were: date; notifying region (Autonomous Community (AC)); pregnancy and its evolution; case classification; mode of transmission; country or region of infection; socio-demographical, clinical and microbiological data. A descriptive analysis of the cases and their distribution according to the other variables was carried out., Results: A total of 512 cases were reported by 17 ACs. 507 were non-congenital, of which 327 (64.5%) were women (52.5% of childbearing age). 403 cases (79.5%) corresponded to 2016 and 193 (38.1%) resided in regions with A. albopictus presence between May and October. 96.1% of imported cases were infected in America (51.7% while visiting relatives). Three cases (3.9%) of congenital Zika virus infection were detected among 77 pregnant women., Conclusions: The evolution of reported cases was in accordance with that of the epidemic in America. The largest group of travellers was young women who travelled to Latin America on family visits. Pregnancy monitoring resulted in the identification of Zika related foetal complications., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: The aim of this study was to calculate the average cost of each hepatitis B, C and HIV follow-up carried out in the health personnel that have suffered an exposure to blood and body fluids and to estimate the cost for each of the different types of sources as well as to identify the items that account for the main part of the cost., Methods: A cost analysis was carried out. The post-exposure programme was modelled in a decision tree combining probabilities (percentage of each type of source in dependence of its positivity for the three viruses and immunization state of the health personnel against hepatitis B) and monetary costs (pesetas from 1994). Costs included: salaries, laboratory, chemist, energy, cleaning, telephone, medical and office equipment, amortization and lost productivity. A sensitivity analysis was carried out with the real fulfillment of the programme., Results: The average cost was 39,564 ptas. (29,750 ptas. applying the sensitivity analysis), with a range from 86,864 ptas. (source positive for the three viruses and injured subject not immunized) to 23,074 ptas. (source negative for the three viruses). If the source was hepatitis B positive, the average cost was 86,093 ptas. when the injured subject was not immunized and 53,232 ptas. if he was immunized. Serologic tests account for the main part of the cost (range from 72.8% to 87.7%)., Conclusions: High cost suggests an appropriate risk evaluation in order to avoid unnecessary follow-ups. The model used allows to know the cost of each potentially avoided episode and it could be used for any hospital in order to make an economical evaluation of new preventive devices.