Search

Objective: To present a case of simultaneous splenic and tubal pregnancy following in vitro fertilization., Design: Case report., Setting: University hospital., Patient(s): A 37-year-old woman who had undergone in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer for unexplained infertility at another clinic., Intervention(s): Laparoscopy and laparotomy., Main Outcome Measure(s): Serum concentration of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) after salpingosplenectomy., Result(s): After transfer of three embryos following fertilization by intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) at another clinic, the patient was referred to our hospital with suspicion of ectopic pregnancy. Because tubal pregnancy was suspected, laparoscopic right salpingectomy was performed. Although villi were detected in the resected fallopian tube, the serum hCG concentration did not decrease after the operation and a new intraabdominal hemorrhage was detected. We then suspected abdominal pregnancy in the epigastric region, and performed magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography, and ultrasound examinations, which revealed implantation at the inferior pole of the spleen. Splenectomy was performed, with the resulting disappearance of intraabdominal hemorrhage and rapid fall of the serum concentration of hCG., Conclusion(s): Assisted reproduction sometimes results in heterotopic pregnancy, but an abdominal pregnancy involving the upper abdominal organs is considered extremely rare. Particularly, splenic pregnancy is usually overlooked and may only be discovered after a sudden intraabdominal hemorrhage. If hemorrhaging is present in the abdominal cavity but pregnancy is not detected within the pelvis, it is advisable to examine patients using imaging techniques to detect any upper abdominal pregnancies.

The success following reconstructive tubal pregnancy can only be measured in terms of live births. Because the fallopian tube is not a simple conduit and has numerous complex functions, many women fail to conceive despite successful reconstructive surgery. The most effective way to prevent reocclusion or peritubal adhesion is to minimize tissue trauma. Magnification permits accurate excision and hemostasis. In this review, it has been demonstrated that tubal conservation is technically possible and safe. It is effective in increasing the number of live births postoperatively in women interested in fertility and does not increase the risk of the repaired tube for a repeat tubal gestation more than the uninvolved tube, although one of five subsequent pregnancies are again ectopic. They seem to occur equally as often in the contralateral tube as in the repaired tube. It has been shown that salpingotomy can restore tubal patency and maintain fertility. The second question was whether the number of viable pregnancies increase after conservative surgery. This question can be answered only if the repaired tube remains and the patient subsequently delivers at term. Such data have already demonstrated this outcome. Conservative operations in selected cases of tubal pregnancy seem feasible and safe and do not further impair tubal function. Because intrauterine pregnancy is more apt to occur than is repeat ectopic pregnancy, it seems logical that the involved tube should be saved whenever fertility is desired (Fig. 2). In unruptured isthmic pregnancy, Stangel and Gomel prefer segmental excision and end-to-end anastomosis during the same intervention. Gomel advocates segmental excision of the conceptus whether ruptured or not when the pregnancy is located in the isthmus or proximal half of the ampulla, and end-to-end anastomosis undertaken later as an elective procedure if necessary (Fig. 2). An ampullary gestation may be successfully treated by salpingotomy; and in the case of distal ampullary location, a tubal abortion may be performed (Fig. 2). When extensive destruction of the tube occurs, salpingectomy becomes necessary. In cases of early diagnosis of tubal gestation, conservative surgical management may be carried out via laparoscopy (Fig. 1).