Search

Objective: To compare the i.m. and s.c. routes of depot GnRH agonist administration., Design: Prospective, controlled pharmacokinetics study., Setting: Volunteers in an academic research environment., Patient(s): Forty women with benign gynecologic disorders., Intervention(s): Triptorelin administration (3.75 mg) at 28-day intervals for 6 consecutive months. Twenty patients were treated with IM triptorelin, and 20 patients were treated with SC triptorelin., Main Outcome Measure(s): Assessment of side effects, GnRH test results, and triptorelin, LH, FSH, estradiol, and progesterone levels., Result(s): The occurrence of injection site redness and itching and of some hypoestrogenic side effects was increased significantly in the SC group. Plasma triptorelin levels were significantly higher in the IM group in the first month of treatment; thereafter, the pattern reversed, with a nonsignificant trend toward higher plasma triptorelin levels in the SC group. Serum LH, FSH, estradiol, and progesterone levels were low after the first month of treatment and did not differ between the two treatment groups. On day 196 (2 months after the last depot triptorelin injection), triptorelin was still measurable and gonadotropins and gonadal steroids were still suppressed. Spontaneous menses returned significantly later in the SC group than in the IM group., Conclusion(s): Subcutaneous triptorelin can be administered by the patient. Both IM and SC triptorelin administration are cliniclly effective, but they result in different triptorelin pharmacokinetics. Subcutaneous triptorelin is associated with more prolonged amenorrhea than is IM triptorelin, suggesting enhanced pituitary-ovarian suppression. These results suggest that SC triptorelin may allow lower drug dosage administration and/or longer administration intervals.

Objectives: To clarify the endocrine mechanisms underlying the outcome of different ovulation induction regimens with gonadotropins and GnRH agonists (GnRH-a)., Design: Prospective study., Setting: Reproductive Endocrinology Center, University of Bologna., Patients: Forty eumenorrheic women randomly assigned to four groups of 10 subjects each., Interventions: Ovulation induction regimens: group A, purified FSH only; group B, purified FSH and flare-up GnRH-a; group C, purified FSH and long GnRH-a; and group D, hMG and long GnRH-a., Main Outcome Measures: Pelvic ultrasound and hormone levels in daily serum samples and in follicular fluid drawn immediately before hCG administration., Results: Exogenous gonadotropin dose did not differ among groups. Group B had fewer preovulatory follicles than group C. Group B had higher serum LH, FSH, E2, P, T, and follicular fluid LH, E2, T, and alpha-inhibin than groups C and/or D. Groups C and D did not differ., Conclusions: Long GnRH-a regimens improved follicle yield and the endocrine milieu in spite of comparable exogenous gonadotropin dose and lower serum FSH and thus appear to be preferable in assisted reproduction. Reduced folliculogenesis found in flare-up GnRH-a regimens could be mediated by the atretic effects of high intraovarian androgens. Efficacy of purified FSH and hMG was comparable.

Objective: To assess the oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT)-stimulated insulin secretion and its relation to pulsatile GnRH ovulation induction outcome in patients with multifollicular or polycystic ovaries (PCOs)., Design: Prospective study., Setting: Reproductive Endocrinology Center, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy., Patients: Eight normal and 29 anovulatory women (8 with multifollicular ovaries and 21 with PCOs)., Intervention: A standard OGTT was performed in all subjects. In all anovulatory patients, ovulation was induced with pulsatile GnRH (5 micrograms i.v. every 60 minutes). In multifollicular ovary patients, pulsatile GnRH was administered alone, whereas in PCOs it was preceded by GnRH agonist (GnRH-a) suppression., Main Outcome Measures: Glucose, insulin, and C-peptide response to the OGTT, expressed as area under the curve (AUC). Ovulatory rates in response to pulsatile GnRH., Results: Insulin and C-peptide AUC were greater than controls in both multifollicular ovary and PCO patients. Insulin AUC was positively correlated to ovarian volume. Ovulation was achieved in 88% and 57% of multifollicular ovary and PCO patients, respectively. Body mass index and glucose AUC but not insulin and C-peptide AUC were significantly greater in the anovulatory PCO., Conclusions: [1] Insulin AUC was increased in both multifollicular ovary and PCO patients; [2] derangements of insulin secretion may be present in a greater variety of anovulatory patients than previously thought; [3] insulin levels during the OGTT did not predict a response to pulsatile GnRH in PCOs, suggesting complex insulin interactions at the ovarian level; [4] given the in vitro stimulatory properties of insulin on granulosa cells synergistic with FSH, we propose that excessive insulin levels may contribute to the ovarian enlargement often found in multifollicular ovary and PCO patients.