1. Reliability, feasibility, and safety of minihysteroscopy with a vaginoscopic approach: experience with 6,000 cases.
- Author
-
Cicinelli E, Parisi C, Galantino P, Pinto V, Barba B, and Schonauer S
- Subjects
- Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Humans, Hysteroscopes, Hysteroscopy adverse effects, Middle Aged, Outpatients, Pelvic Pain pathology, Retrospective Studies, Uterine Diseases diagnosis, Uterus surgery, Hysteroscopy methods
- Abstract
Objective: To assess the reliability, feasibility, and safety of lens-based minihysteroscopy., Design: Retrospective comparative study., Setting: Academic research environment., Patient(s): Women with different indications for hysteroscopy., Intervention(s): Six thousand seventeen outpatient diagnostic hysteroscopies with a minihysteroscope (2.7-mm outer diameter [OD] telescope with 3.5-mm OD single-flow diagnostic sheath) and 4,204 with traditional hysteroscope (4-mm OD telescope with 5-mm OD single-flow diagnostic sheath). All hysteroscopies were performed using a vaginoscopic approach and saline to distend the uterus., Main Outcome Measure(s): Rate of successful introduction of the hysteroscope, rate of satisfactory examinations, pain intensity experienced using an arbitrary pain scale (0 = no pain; 1 = low pain; 2 = moderate pain; 3 = severe pain), and number of side effects and complications., Result(s): In the minihysteroscopy, group rates of successful introduction and satisfactory examinations were significantly higher than in the traditional hysteroscope group (99.52% vs.72.53% and 98.53% vs. 92.33%, respectively), while pain and vagal reactions were significantly lower (0.10 +/- 0.34 vs.1.09 +/- 0.53 and 2.25% vs.17.12%, respectively)., Conclusion(s): Hysteroscopy with lens-based minihysteroscopes was easier, less painful, more reliable, and safer than with 5-mm hysteroscopes. Minihysteroscopy with a vaginoscopic approach is a very well tolerated, effective, and safe outpatient procedure.
- Published
- 2003
- Full Text
- View/download PDF