38 results on '"Oxman, Andrew D"'
Search Results
2. GRADE Guidelines: 16. GRADE evidence to decision frameworks for tests in clinical practice and public health
3. A reanalysis of cluster randomized trials showed interrupted time-series studies were valuable in health system evaluation
4. Interrupted time-series analysis yielded an effect estimate concordant with the cluster-randomized controlled trial result
5. GRADE guidelines: 15. Going from evidence to recommendation—determinants of a recommendation's direction and strength
6. GRADE guidelines: 14. Going from evidence to recommendations: the significance and presentation of recommendations
7. GRADE guidelines: 13. Preparing Summary of Findings tables and evidence profiles—continuous outcomes
8. GRADE guidelines: 10. Considering resource use and rating the quality of economic evidence
9. GRADE guidelines: 11. Making an overall rating of confidence in effect estimates for a single outcome and for all outcomes
10. GRADE guidelines: 12. Preparing Summary of Findings tables—binary outcomes
11. GRADE guidelines 6. Rating the quality of evidence—imprecision
12. GRADE guidelines: 9. Rating up the quality of evidence
13. GRADE guidelines: 7. Rating the quality of evidence—inconsistency
14. GRADE guidelines: 8. Rating the quality of evidence—indirectness
15. GRADE guidelines: 5. Rating the quality of evidence—publication bias
16. GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction—GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables
17. GRADE guidelines: 4. Rating the quality of evidence—study limitations (risk of bias)
18. GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence
19. GRADE guidelines: 2. Framing the question and deciding on important outcomes
20. GRADE guidelines: A new series of articles in the Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
21. Summary-of-findings tables in Cochrane reviews improved understanding and rapid retrieval of key information
22. User testing and stakeholder feedback contributed to the development of understandable and useful Summary of Findings tables for Cochrane reviews
23. A pragmatic–explanatory continuum indicator summary (PRECIS): a tool to help trial designers
24. Symbols were superior to numbers for presenting strength of recommendations to health care consumers: a randomized trial
25. Summaries of findings, descriptions of interventions, and information about adverse effects would make reviews more informative
26. Corrigendum to GRADE guidelines 6. Rating the quality of evidence-imprecision. J Clin Epidemiol 2011;64:1283–1293
27. Why we will remain pragmatists: four problems with the impractical mechanistic framework and a better solution
28. A pragmatic resolution
29. Farewell and thanks to Dave Sackett, Cochrane’s first pilot
30. Erratum to “GRADE guidelines: 13. Preparing Summary of Findings tables and evidence profiles—continuous outcomes” [J Clin Epidemiol 2013;66(2):173-183]
31. The OFF theory of research utilization
32. GRADE guidelines—an introduction to the 10th–13th articles in the series
33. Pragmatic trials are randomized and may use a placebo
34. It is a capital mistake to theorize before one has data: a response to Eccle's criticism of the OFF theory of research utilization
35. Agreement among reviewers of review articles
36. An index of scientific quality for health reports in the lay press
37. Validation of an index of the quality of review articles
38. To what extent do congestive heart failure patients in sinus rhythm benefit from digoxin therapy? A systematic overview and meta-analysis
Catalog
Books, media, physical & digital resources
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.