Search

Interleukin-1beta (IL-1beta) induces degradation via hyperexpression of an array of genes, including metalloproteinases (MMP), in cartilage cells during articular degenerative diseases. In contrast, natural ligands for peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs) display protective anti-cytokine effects in these cells. We used the PPAR agonist rosiglitazone (Rtz) to investigate PPAR-gamma isotype on IL-1beta-target genes. Immunocytochemistry, electrophoretic mobility shift, and transient transfection assays revealed a functional PPAR-gamma in chondrocytes in vitro. Rtz displayed significant inhibition of IL-1beta effects in chondrocytes. Low Rtz concentrations (close to K(d) values for PPAR-gamma, 0.1 to 1 microm) inhibited the effects of IL-1beta on (35)S-sulfated proteoglycan production and gelatinolytic activities and downregulated MMP1 expression at mRNA and protein levels. We have investigated the mechanism of action of Rtz against IL-1beta-mediated MMP1 gene hyperexpression. Rtz effect occurs at the transcriptional level of the MMP1 promoter, as observed in transiently transfected cells with pMMP1-luciferase vector. Transient expression of wild type PPAR-gamma enhanced Rtz inhibitory effect in chondrocytes, whereas a mutated dominant negative PPAR-gamma abolished it, supporting the role of PPAR-gamma in this effect. MMP1 gene promoter analysis revealed the involvement of a cis-acting element located at -83 to -77, shown to be a composite PPRE/AP1 site. Gel mobility and supershift assays demonstrated that PPAR-gamma and c-Fos/c-Jun proteins bind this cis-acting element in a mutually exclusive way. Our data highlight a new PPAR-gamma-dependent inhibitory mechanism on IL-1beta-mediated cartilage degradation occurring through DNA binding competition on the composite PPRE/AP1 site in the MMP1 promoter.

We have identified 7-ketocholesterol (7-KC) as an endogenous modulator that inhibits transactivation by the arylhydrocarbon receptor (AhR) through competitive binding against xenobiotic ligands. 7-KC binds AhR and displaces labeled dioxin (2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo(p)dioxin (TCDD)). IC(50) is 5 x 10(-7) m in vivo and 7 x 10(-6) m in vitro. These figures are consistent with its concentration in human blood plasma and tissues. Association with 7-KC prevents AhR binding to DNA. 7-KC blocks the TCDD-mediated transactivation of stably expressed reporter gene constructs in T47-D cells as well as the expression of the endogenous CYP 1A1 gene in HepG2 cells and in primary porcine aortic endothelial cells. Injection of 7-KC to rats blocks the induction of CYP 1A1 messenger RNA and protein in endothelial cells from myocardial blood vessels. The differential sensitivity of mammalian species to toxic effects of AhR ligands, especially dioxin (TCDD), correlates with the expression of 7-hydroxycholesterol dehydrogenase, which synthesizes 7-KC from 7-hydroxycholesterol. The documented involvement of AhR ligands in cardiovascular diseases through lipid peroxidation and endothelium dysfunction can now be examined in the context of displacement of this protective modulator.

Transcriptional regulation of the progesterone receptor gene involves induction by estrogens and down-regulation by progestins, retinoic acid, and AP-1 proteins. We have previously identified an intragenic (+698/+723) estrogen-responsive element present in the progesterone receptor gene, which binds the estradiol receptor and mediates estrogen and 4-OH tamoxifen induction. Progesterone receptor gene expression was equally stimulated by estradiol and 4-OH tamoxifen in the presence of a NH2 terminally deleted estrogen receptor mutant lacking activation function 1, suggesting that activation function 2 was the predominant activation domain. This was confirmed by the lack of activity of an estrogen receptor mutant deleted of activation function 2. Repression by progestins, retinoic acid, and AP-1 was mediated by the same estrogen responsive element although retinoic and progesterone receptors as well as AP-1 proteins did not bind to this element. Repression by these proteins appears to involve different transactivating regions of the estrogen receptor. Repression by retinoic receptors involved only activation function 2 whereas repression by progesterone receptor and AP-1 necessitated both functional domains. Since these proteins act without directly contacting the DNA, it seems likely that repression may be achieved by protein-protein interactions among different domains of the estrogen receptor and/or the transcriptional machinery.