Search

Background: Fluorine-18 sodium fluoride (Na[ 18 F]F) atherosclerotic plaque uptake in positron emission tomography with computed tomography (PET-CT) identifies active microcalcification. We aim to evaluate global cardiac microcalcification activity with Na[ 18 F]F, as a measure of unstable microcalcification burden, in high cardiovascular (CV) risk patients., Methods and Results: Thirty-four high CV risk individuals without previous CV events were scanned with Na[ 18 F]F PET-CT. Cardiac Na[ 18 F]F uptake was assessed through the global molecular calcium score (GMCS), which was calculated by summing the product of the mean standardized uptake value times the area of the cardiac regions of interest times the slice thickness for all cardiac transaxial slices, divided by the total number of slices. Mean age is 63.5 ± 7.8 years and 62% male. Median GMCS is 320.9 (240.8-402.8). Individuals with more than five CV risk factors (50%) have increased GMCS [356.7 (321.0-409.6) vs. 261.1 (225.6-342.1), P = 0.01], which is positively correlated with predicted fatal CV risk by SCORE (r s  = 0.32, P = 0.04). There is a positive correlation between GMCS and weight (r s  = 0.61), body mass index (r s  = 0.66), abdominal perimeter (r s  = 0.74), thoracic fat volume (r s  = 0.47), and epicardial adipose tissue (r s  = 0.41), all with P ≤ 0.01. There is no correlation between GMCS and coronary calcium score nor coronary artery wall Na[ 18 F]F uptake., Conclusions: In a high CV risk group, the global cardiac microcalcification burden is related to CV risk factors, metabolic syndrome variables and cardiac fat. Cardiac GMCS is a promising risk stratification tool, combining a straightforward and objective methodology with a comprehensive analysis of both coronary and valvular microcalcification., (© 2021. American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.)

Background: 18-Fluorine sodium fluoride is a well-known radiotracer used for bone metastasis diagnosis. Its uptake correlation with cardiovascular (CV) risk was primarily suggested in oncological patients. Moreover, as a specific marker of microcalcification, it seems to correlate with CV disease progression and plaque instability., Methods and Results: Our purpose was to systematically review clinical studies that characterized the use of this marker in CV conditions. In atherosclerosis, most studies report a positive correlation with the burden of CV risk factors and vascular calcification. A higher uptake was found in culprit plaques/rupture sites in coronary and carotid arteries and it was also linked to high-risk features in histology and intravascular imaging analysis of the plaques. In aortic stenosis, this tracer displayed an increasing uptake with disease severity., Conclusions: Sodium fluoride positron emission tomography is a promising non-invasive technique to identify high-risk plaques, which sets ground to a potential use of this tracer in evaluating atherosclerotic disease progression and degenerative changes in aortic valve stenosis. Nevertheless, there is a need for further prospective evidence that demonstrates this technique's value in predicting clinical events, adjusting treatment strategies, and improving patient outcomes., (© 2019. American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.)

Background: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the uptake of F18-NaF by the arterial wall in patients with high cardiovascular (CV) risk profile. The tracer uptake was assessed in relation to gender and the number of CV risk factors., Methods and Results: 25 patients without known CV disease were included and evaluated by PET-CT with F18-NaF: 14 (56%) men and 11 (44%) women. The mean target-to-background ratio (TBR: max SUV/mean blood-pool SUV) but not the corrected uptake per lesion (CUL: max SUV - mean blood-pool SUV) was higher in men than women (TBR: 1.8 ± 0.6 vs 1.7 ± 0.2; P = 0.04; CUL: 0.7 ± 0.3 vs W 0.6 ± 0.1; P = 0.4). Patients with >3 CV risk factors had higher CUL (0.8 ± 0.1 vs 0.6 ± 0.2; P = 0.01) but not TBR (1.8 ± 0.2 vs 1.7 ± 0.6; P = 0.7) than patients with <3 risk factors., Conclusions: The TBR but not CUL is higher in men than women while the CUL but not TBR is related to the number of CV risk factors. These results are hypothesis-generating and require validation in larger studies.