Search

Background: Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) is a non-atherosclerotic cause of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) that affects women disproportionately. Previous case series have found that patients with SCAD undergoing cardiac catheterisation have high rates of iatrogenic coronary damage. We formally compared the rate of iatrogenic coronary artery dissection in women with and without SCAD undergoing cardiac catheterisation over a 11-year period. Method(s): Women with SCAD were identified by a search of the cardiac catheterisation database 2007-2017 for the keywords 'SCAD', 'spontaneous coronary artery dissection', 'spontaneous coronary dissection', and 'spontaneous dissection'. For each identified case, the medical record and the coronary angiogram images were reviewed to confirm spontaneous coronary dissection. For cases of recurrent SCAD, duplicates were removed so that each patient was included only once in this analysis. For each identified case of SCAD, a control case was chosen from women aged <70 years, without SCAD, undergoing cardiac catheterisation for an ACS during the same 10-year period. One control case was chosen to match each SCAD patient as closely as possible for age and year of cardiac catheterisation. Iatrogenic coronary dissection was defined as new, proximal, flow limiting coronary artery dissection in a different coronary segment to the presenting spontaneous coronary dissection. Result(s): Eighty-five (85) cases of women with SCAD were identified. Mean age was not different between SCAD and non-SCAD women (51+/-11 and 51+/-10 years, respectively). The SCAD group had lower rates of ST elevation myocardial infarction, lower rises in serum creatine kinase (CK) and troponin levels, lower rates of diabetes and smoking, and far less placement of stents during the procedure than the control group. The rate of additional iatrogenic dissection relating to the cardiac catheterisation procedure was 4 of 85 (4.7%) versus 0 of 85 (0%), p=0.04 in

Background: Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) is a non-atherosclerotic cause of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) that affects women disproportionately. Previous case series have found that patients with SCAD undergoing cardiac catheterisation have high rates of iatrogenic coronary damage. We formally compared the rate of iatrogenic coronary artery dissection in women with and without SCAD undergoing cardiac catheterisation over a 11-year period. Method(s): Women with SCAD were identified by a search of the cardiac catheterisation database 2007-2017 for the keywords 'SCAD', 'spontaneous coronary artery dissection', 'spontaneous coronary dissection', and 'spontaneous dissection'. For each identified case, the medical record and the coronary angiogram images were reviewed to confirm spontaneous coronary dissection. For cases of recurrent SCAD, duplicates were removed so that each patient was included only once in this analysis. For each identified case of SCAD, a control case was chosen from women aged <70 years, without SCAD, undergoing cardiac catheterisation for an ACS during the same 10-year period. One control case was chosen to match each SCAD patient as closely as possible for age and year of cardiac catheterisation. Iatrogenic coronary dissection was defined as new, proximal, flow limiting coronary artery dissection in a different coronary segment to the presenting spontaneous coronary dissection. Result(s): Eighty-five (85) cases of women with SCAD were identified. Mean age was not different between SCAD and non-SCAD women (51+/-11 and 51+/-10 years, respectively). The SCAD group had lower rates of ST elevation myocardial infarction, lower rises in serum creatine kinase (CK) and troponin levels, lower rates of diabetes and smoking, and far less placement of stents during the procedure than the control group. The rate of additional iatrogenic dissection relating to the cardiac catheterisation procedure was 4 of 85 (4.7%) versus 0 of 85 (0%), p=0.04 in

Background: Antithrombotic recommendations following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are largely based on previous trial protocols. The efficacy and risk of anticoagulation has not been systematically assessed. The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy and safety of oral anticoagulation in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) following TAVR with the Lotus Valve System (Boston Scientific, Marlborough, MA, USA). Method(s): Consecutive patients with severe aortic stenosis who underwent Lotus valve implantation were prospectively recruited (n = 164). Atrial fibrillation patients prescribed oral anticoagulation (standard AF therapy) were compared to non-AF patients prescribed aspirin and clopidogrel (standard non-AF therapy). Twenty (20) of 164 patients were excluded, as they were not prescribed standard therapy. The primary endpoint was 6-month incidence of death, myocardial infarction, stroke/transient ischaemic attack (TIA) or major/life-threatening bleeding. Secondary endpoints included each component of the primary endpoint, defined according to VARC-2. Result(s): Overall, the primary endpoint occurred in 20.8% and 17.7% of the standard AF and standard non-AF therapy groups respectively (p = 0.82). There was no statistically significant difference in bleeding (12.5% versus 9.4%, p = 0.77) or stroke/TIA (2.1% versus 8.3%, p = 0.27) between the standard AF and standard non-AF therapy groups respectively. Conclusion(s): This study supports the safety of anticoagulation in AF patients, which did not result in excess risk of bleeding or stroke/TIA compared with dual antiplatelet therapy in non-AF patients.Copyright © 2018 Australian and New Zealand Society of Cardiac and Thoracic Surgeons (ANZSCTS) and the Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand (CSANZ)

Background: Antithrombotic recommendations following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are largely based on previous trial protocols. The efficacy and risk of anticoagulation has not been systematically assessed. The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy and safety of oral anticoagulation in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) following TAVR with the Lotus Valve System (Boston Scientific, Marlborough, MA, USA). Method(s): Consecutive patients with severe aortic stenosis who underwent Lotus valve implantation were prospectively recruited (n = 164). Atrial fibrillation patients prescribed oral anticoagulation (standard AF therapy) were compared to non-AF patients prescribed aspirin and clopidogrel (standard non-AF therapy). Twenty (20) of 164 patients were excluded, as they were not prescribed standard therapy. The primary endpoint was 6-month incidence of death, myocardial infarction, stroke/transient ischaemic attack (TIA) or major/life-threatening bleeding. Secondary endpoints included each component of the primary endpoint, defined according to VARC-2. Result(s): Overall, the primary endpoint occurred in 20.8% and 17.7% of the standard AF and standard non-AF therapy groups respectively (p = 0.82). There was no statistically significant difference in bleeding (12.5% versus 9.4%, p = 0.77) or stroke/TIA (2.1% versus 8.3%, p = 0.27) between the standard AF and standard non-AF therapy groups respectively. Conclusion(s): This study supports the safety of anticoagulation in AF patients, which did not result in excess risk of bleeding or stroke/TIA compared with dual antiplatelet therapy in non-AF patients.Copyright © 2018 Australian and New Zealand Society of Cardiac and Thoracic Surgeons (ANZSCTS) and the Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand (CSANZ)