Search

Diagnosis of chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection, initial staging of infection and monitoring of treated and untreated patients are mainly based on clinical, biological and imaging criteria allowing a complete non-invasive management for the majority of patients. Along to the conventional virological tools, rapid diagnostic tests and blotting paper tests for HBV DNA are validated alternatives. After diagnosis, the initial work-up should include HIV, HCV and HDV serologies, HBeAg status, and HBsAg and HBV DNA quantification. Assessment of severity (inflammation and fibrosis) is based on ALT serum levels and non-invasive evaluation of liver fibrosis by elastography or blood tests, which must be interpreted cautiously using specific cut-offs and taking into account ALT levels. Taken together, these parameters allow disease classification and treatment decision. Decision of hepatocellular carcinoma screening by ultra-sound every six months may be difficult in non-cirrhotic patients and the use of risk-scores such as PAGE-B is encouraged. Chronic HBV infection often has a dynamic and often unpredictable profile and regular monitoring is mandatory. In untreated patients, regular (3-12 months) follow-up should include ALT and HBV DNA serum levels. Periodical HBsAg quantification and non-invasive evaluation of liver fibrosis may refine disease outcome and prognosis. In treated patients, checking efficacy is mainly based on HBV DNA negativity. In patients with advanced fibrosis, evolution of liver stiffness can be useful for portal hypertension evaluation, but its improvement should not be considered to stop hepatocellular carcinoma screening. Finally, new parameters (HBV RNA, HBcrAg) are promising but their use is still restricted for research., (Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.)

Compensated advanced chronic liver disease (cACLD) describes the spectrum of advanced fibrosis/cirrhosis in asymptomatic patients at risk of developing clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH, defined by a hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) ≥10 mmHg). Patients with cACLD are at high risk of liver-related morbidity and mortality. In patients at risk of chronic liver disease, cACLD is strongly suggested by a liver stiffness (LSM) value >15 kPa or clinical/biological/radiological signs of portal hypertension, and ruled out by LSM <10 kPa, or Fibrotest® ≤0.58, or Fibrometer® ≤0.786. Patients with chronic liver disease (excluding vascular diseases) with a LSM <10 kPa are at low risk of developing portal hypertension complications. The presence of CSPH can be strongly suspected when LSM is ≥20 kPa. In a patient without clinical, endoscopic or radiological features of portal hypertension, measurement of the HVPG is recommended before major liver or intra-abdominal surgery, before extra-hepatic transplantation and in patients with unexplained ascites. Endoscopic screening for oesophageal varices can be avoided in patients with LSM <20 kPa and a platelet count >150 G/L (favourable Baveno VI criteria) at the time of diagnosis. There is no non-invasive method alternative for oeso-gastroduodenal endoscopy in patients with unfavourable Baveno criteria (liver stiffness ≥20 kPa or platelet count ≤50 G/l). Platelet count and liver stiffness measurements must be performed once a year in patients with cACLD with favourable Baveno VI criteria at the time of diagnosis. A screening oeso-gastroduodenal endoscopy is recommended if Baveno VI criteria become unfavourable., (Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.)

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is a major cause of chronic liver disease. Clinical care for patients with HCV-related liver disease has advanced considerably with developments in screening, diagnostic procedures to evaluate liver fibrosis and improvements in therapy with pangenotypic direct antivirals and prevention. These AFEF guidelines on the non-invasive diagnosis and follow up of chronic infection with HCV describe the optimal management of HCV positive patients with non-invasive methods in screening, in assessing viral disease and liver fibrosis and the follow-up of these patients according to the value of FibroScan®, Fibrotest® or Fibrometer®. Hepatocellular carcinoma screening must continue in patients with liver stiffness by FibroScan® ≥10 kPa or Fibrotest® >0.58 or Fibrometer® >0.78 prior to treatment initiation. After reaching sustained virologic response, patients with a measurement of liver stiffness by FibroScan®<10 kPa or Fibrotest®≤0.58 or Fibrometer®≤0.78 before treatment initiation and without liver comorbidity (alcohol consumption, metabolic syndrome, HBV co-infection etc.) no longer require specific monitoring. The role of liver biopsy is discussed in some rare situations., (Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.)

Liver elastography offers the possibility of a quick, non-invasive, and painless evaluation of the liver with immediate results at bedside. Transient elastography is the most validated technology, and many others such as point shear wave elastography, 2D-shear wave elastography, or magnetic resonance elastography have been developed. To ensure the best evaluation, several conditions of examination must be respected for liver stiffness measurement. Indeed, patient, operator and examination characteristics have all been shown to influence the result of liver stiffness measurement. Food intake increases liver stiffness, whereas withdrawal in alcoholics is associated with a decrease in elastography results. Inter-observer reproducibility of the measurement seems suboptimal, and the influence of the operator experience is still being debated. The measurement site and the FibroScan® probe must be correctly chosen. Finally, the intrinsic characteristics and quality criteria of the measurement, especially the interquartile range/median ratio, must be carefully checked to avoid overestimation of liver stiffness. Most of the results come from studies which have evaluated transient elastography, with less data available for the other technologies. Liver stiffness measurement could appear as a simple way to explore the liver, but several conditions must be met before deciding the patient management according to its result., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Rare genetic liver diseases can result in multi-systemic damage, which may compromise the patient's prognosis. Wilson's disease and alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency must be investigated in any patient with unexplained liver disease. Cystic fibrosis screening of new-borns is now implemented in most high-prevalence countries. The diagnosis of these diseases can be strongly suggested with specific non-invasive tests. Molecular analysis gene for these diseases is long and tedious but is recommended to confirm the diagnosis and help for the family screening. Liver biopsy is not systematic and is discussed when it helps diagnosis. Currently, for these three diseases, non-invasive fibrosis markers could identify patients with risk of cirrhosis and complications. Rare genetic liver diseases can result in multi-systemic damage, which may compromise the patient's prognosis. Wilson's disease, must be investigated in any patient with unexplained liver disease and/or unexplained neurological or neuropsychiatric disorders. The diagnosis is based on a combination of clinical, biological features, including copper balance. The exchangeable copper/total copper ratio is a new sensible and specific biological marker, useful for the diagnosis of the disease. Timely diagnosis and treatment will prevent serious complications from the disease. Neurological evaluation and familial screening are essential in patients with Wilson's disease., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest BOURLIÈRE Marc: Abbott, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Gilead, GSK, Idenix, Intercept, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Vertex BOUZBIB Charlotte: AbbVie, Gilead, Novartis BUREAU Christophe AbbVie, Gilead, Gore DE LÉDINGHEN Victor: AbbVie, Alfasigma, BMS, Diafir, Echosens, Gilead, Indivior, Intercept, Medac, Myr Pharma, Pfizer, Promethera, Spimaco, Supersonic Imagine DUCLOS-VALLÉE Jean-Charles: No conflict of interest GANNE-CARRIÉ Nathalie: Bayer, Gilead, Ipsen, Roche, Shionogi GUILLAUD Olivier: Declared no conflicts of interest POUJOIS Aurélia: Declared no conflicts of interest SOBESKY Rodolphe: Declared no conflicts of interest SOGNI Philippe: AbbVie, BMS, Galmed, Genfit, Gilead, Intercept, Janssen, MSD, Viking WOIMANT France: Declared no conflicts of interest, (Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.)

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is a liver disease characterised by necrotico-inflammatory lesions of hepatocytes, the presence of specific autoantibodies and response to corticosteroid treatment. AIH must be considered in any patient with acute or chronic liver disease. As there is no pathognomonic sign of AIH, the diagnosis is based on a combination of clinical, biological, immunological and histological findings, after excluding other causes of liver disease. The clinical and biological presentation of AIH is variable and AIH can be associated with an autoimmune biliary disease, primary biliary cholangitis or primary sclerosing cholangitis in an overlap syndrome. For these reasons, diagnosis of AIH can be challenging. Even if liver histology remains essential in the diagnosis of AIH, non-invasive tests can be used at different steps of the management of AIH: diagnosis of AIH, notably diagnosis of an overlap syndrome, assessment of severity of AIH, searching for extra-hepatic disease frequently associated to AIH, evaluation of response to therapy, decision of treatment withdrawal. This review aims to provide practical guidelines for the use of non-invasive tests for the diagnosis and the follow-up of AIH., (Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.)

Among a wide range of malignant liver tumours, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) developed on a background of cirrhosis represents the most frequent clinical situation. In this setting, HCC is one of the rare solid tumours for which histological confirmation is not mandatory. The convergence of multiple arguments obtained by non-invasive parameters using radiological findings allows to avoid liver biopsy in a large proportion of patients when a diagnosis of underlying cirrhosis is ascertained. Conversely, in case of atypical presentation or in order to exclude other rare malignant tumours mostly developed in the absence of cirrhosis, liver biopsy will then be essential. Based on typical radiological patterns described by contrast-enhanced imaging, numerous clinical guidelines have endorsed non-invasive diagnosis, staging and monitoring of HCC patients under treatment since 20 years. These algorithms have evolved over the years, taking into account progress in radiological technology and advances in curative or palliative procedures. Large cohort studies have also helped to refine diagnostic criteria and prognostication in the setting of complex therapeutic strategy. Unsupervised multi-analysis approaches both at the biological and radiological levels will in the future enrich the panel of non-invasive markers useful in clinical practice to manage HCC and other malignant tumours., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest None., (Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.)

Increased serum ferritin is a very frequent cause of referral for which thorough evaluation is required to avoid unnecessary exploration and inaccurate diagnosis. Clinicians must thus know factors and tools that are relevant in this setting. Several biochemical and radiological tools drastically improved the diagnosis work-up of increased serum ferritin. Because serum ferritin value can be altered by many cofounding factors, scrutiny in the initial clinical evaluation is crucial. Alcohol consumption, and the metabolic syndrome are the most frequent causes of secondary increased ferritin. Serum transferrin saturation level is a pivotal test, and if increased prompt testing for HFE C282Y patients in Caucasian population. In most cases further tests are require to establish whether increased ferritin is associated or not to iron overload. Magnetic resonance imaging is the reference method allowing to accurately establish liver iron content which indirectly reflect body iron load. Second line genetic testing for rare forms of iron overload or increased serum ferritin are available in reference center and should be discussed if diagnosis is equivocal or remain uncertain after careful evaluation. Definite genetic diagnosis is worthwhile as it allows family screening and refining long term management of the patient. Liver biopsy remains seldom useful to assess liver fibrosis, mostly in patients with severe iron overload., Competing Interests: Declarations of Competing Interest BARDOU-JACQUET Edouard: Gilead, Intercept, La Jolla, Novartis, Synageva BOURLIÈRE Marc: Abbott, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Gilead, GSK, Idenix, Intercept, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Vertex BUREAU Christophe: AbbVie, Gilead, Gore DE LÉDINGHEN Victor: AbbVie, Alfasigma, BMS, Diafir, Echosens, Gilead, Indivior, Intercept, Medac, Myr Pharma, Pfizer, Promethera, Spimaco, Supersonic Imagine DECRAECKER Marie: No conflict of interest GANNE-CARRIÉ Nathalie: Bayer, Gilead, Ipsen, Roche, Shionogi HAMDI-ROZE Houda: No conflict of interest PAISANT Anita: Declared no conflicts of interest, (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) is a rare and chronic cholestatic liver disease of unknown cause commonly associated with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and characterized by progressive obliterative fibro-inflammation of the biliary tree. Although the natural course is highly variable, PSC is often progressive, leading to biliary cirrhosis and its complications. In addition, PSC is a condition harbouring broad neoplastic potential with increased susceptibility for the development of both biliary and colon cancer. As in other chronic liver diseases, non-invasive methods play a major role in the diagnosis and monitoring of PSC. MR cholangiography is the key exam for the diagnosis and has replaced diagnostic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). A strict and standardised protocol for carrying out MR cholangiography is recommended. Liver stiffness measured by FibroScan® correlates with the degree of liver fibrosis, has a prognostic value and should be repeated during follow-up. Invasive methods still play an important role, especially ERCP which is indicated for therapeutic purposes or for endo-biliary sample collection in suspected cholangiocarcinoma (following discussion in a multidisciplinary team meeting) and total colonoscopy which is recommended at the initial diagnosis of any PSC and annually in patients with IBD., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Vascular disorders of the liver are rare diseases, some of which are diagnosed mainly with non-invasive tests and others by liver biopsy. Non-invasive methods can be used to diagnose and monitor these diseases. However, their evaluation needs to be performed by expert centers. Liver biopsy is needed each time there is an unexplained abnormality., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

The field of liver transplantation directly or indirectly embodies all liver diseases, in addition to specific ones related to organ rejection (cellular and humoral). The recommended non-invasive methods for determining the indication for liver transplantation are the Model for End-stage Liver Disease score, and the alpha-foetoprotein score in case of hepatocellular carcinoma. Radiological methods are the cornerstones for the diagnosis of vascular and biliary complications after liver transplantation. The possible diseases of the liver graft after transplantation are multiple and often intertwined. Non-invasive diagnostic methods have been poorly evaluated in this context, apart from the recurrence of hepatitis C. Liver biopsy remains the gold standard for evaluating graft lesions in the majority of cases, especially graft rejection., (Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.)

Hepatocellular benign liver tumours are mainly developed on normal liver and include hepatic hemangioma, focal nodular hyperplasia and hepatocellular adenoma from the most frequent to the less frequent. The diagnosis of hepatic hemangioma and of simple hepatic biliary cysts can be performed using non-invasive criteria using liver ultrasonography or contrast enhanced MRI. Most of the time the diagnosis of focal nodular hyperplasia can be achieved using contrast-enhanced ultrasonography or contrast enhanced MRI with an additional value of hepatobiliary contrast-agent in this setting. Rarely, if a doubt persists, a tumour and non-tumour liver biopsy can be required in order to establish the diagnosis. As hepatic hemangioma, simple hepatic biliary cysts and focal nodular hyperplasia are not associated with complications, they don't require any treatments or follow-up. Hepatocellular adenomas are mainly diagnosed at histology on surgical samples or liver biopsy even if some radiological features are highly suggestive of several subtypes of hepatocellular adenomas. Finally, the management of hepatocellular adenomas should be guided according to the tumour size, gender but also to the molecular subtypes., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest None., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

NAFLD is a frequent disease that affects 25% of the worldwide population. There is no specific diagnostic test for NAFLD, and the diagnosis mainly relies on the elimination of the other causes of chronic liver diseases with liver biopsy kept for unsure diagnoses. Non-invasive tests are now available to assess NAFLD severity and therefore to help physicians decide on the patient management and follow-up. These non-invasive tests can also be used to define pathways that organize referrals from primary care and diabetology clinics to the liver specialist, with the ambition to improve the screening of asymptomatic patients with NAFLD and advanced liver disease. NAFLD being the liver expression of the metabolic syndrome, physicians need also take care to screen for diabetes and to evaluate the cardiovascular risk in those patients. These recommendations from the French Association for the Study of the Liver (AFEF) aim at providing guidance on the following questions: how to diagnose NAFLD; how non-invasive tests should be used to assess NAFLD severity; how to follow patients with NAFLD; when to perform liver biopsy in NAFLD; and how to decide referral to the liver specialist for a patient with NAFLD., Competing Interests: Declarations of Competing Interest BOURLIÈRE Marc: Abbott, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Gilead, GSK, Idenix, Intercept, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Vertex BOURSIER Jérôme: AbbVie, BMS, Echosens, Gilead, Intercept, Inventiva, Siemens Healthineers BOUZBIB Charlotte: AbbVie, Gilead, Novartis BUREAU Christophe: AbbVie, Gilead, Gore CARIOU Bertrand: Declared no conflicts of interest GANNE-CARRIÉ Nathalie: Bayer, Gilead, Ipsen, Roche, Shionogi GUILLAUME Maeva: AbbVie, Gilead, Novartis DE LÉDINGHEN Victor: AbbVie, Alfasigma, BMS, Diafir, Echosens, Gilead, Indivior, Intercept, Medac, Myr Pharma, Pfizer, Promethera, Spimaco, Supersonic Imagine LANNES Adrien: No conflict of interest PAIS Raluca: Intercept SMATTI Sarra: No conflict of interest, (Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.)

Primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) is a chronic inflammatory disease of the intra-hepatic bile ducts [1]. It is characterised biologically by chronic cholestasis associated with the presence of specific autoantibodies, and histologically by lesions of nonsuppurative destructive cholangitis. If left untreated it can progress to cirrhosis, portal hypertension and liver failure. Diagnosis, staging and follow-up are largely based on non- or minimally-invasive assessment (blood tests, ultrasound, liver stiffness measurement). Histological examination of the liver and upper gastrointestinal endoscopy are sometimes necessary, but their indications remain limited. The purpose of this chapter is to provide the clinicians with what should be known about the non-invasive assessment of PBC and to provide specific recommendations for clinical practice., Competing Interests: Declarations of interest BOURLIÈRE Marc: Abbott, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Gilead, GSK, Idenix, Intercept, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Vertex BUREAU Christophe: AbbVie, Gilead, Gore CORPECHOT Christophe: Arrow Génériques, Cymabay, Genkyotex, Intercept, Siemens Healthineers, Biotest, Abbvie, Gilead, GSK DE LÉDINGHEN Victor: AbbVie, Alfasigma, BMS, Diafir, Echosens, Gilead, Indivior, Intercept, Medac, Myr Pharma, Pfizer, Promethera, Spimaco, Supersonic Imagine DECRAECKER Marie: No conflict of interest GANNE-CARRIÉ Nathalie: Bayer, Gilead, Ipsen, Roche, Shionogi HANSLIK Bertrand: AbbVie, Echosens, Gilead, Intercept, MSD HEURGUE Alexandra: No conflict of interest POTIER Pascal: No conflict of interest TANNE Florence: AbbVie, Bayer, Gilead, Ipsen, Mayoli, (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Background: Although it has now been excluded that direct-acting antivirals (DAA) are associated with a significant risk of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in HCV-infected patients, a possible effect of DAA on tumor growth is still a subject of debate. We performed a blind comparison of the kinetics of HCC recurrence in patients after HCV treatment with or without DAA to evaluate the potential aggressiveness of HCC after DAA treatment., Basic Procedures: Thirty-nine HCV-infected patients from the AFEF/ANRS CO22 Hepather cohort who experienced HCC recurrence after so-called curative treatment were evaluated. Contrast-enhanced CT and/or MR images were read blindly 6 months before HCC recurrence and during the follow-up period. Seventeen patients who received DAA (DAA+) before HCC recurrence were compared to the 22 who did not receive (DAA-), according to the LiRads and mRECIST criteria., Main Findings: There were 28 men and 11 women, median age 62 years old, 37 (95%) with cirrhosis. DAA+ patients had a lower median MELD score (8±2 vs. 10±4, P=0.0286) than DAA- patients. The median time to HCC recurrence (time from the date of curative treatment to the diagnosis of recurrence) was not different (20 vs. 18 months) (P=0.73) between the two groups. There was no difference between the 2 groups in the overall survival and/or transplantation-free survival (P=0.71) and for the mRECIST time to progression (P=0.25)., Conclusion: This blinded analysis of HCC recurrence after HCC treatment does not support any negative impact of DAA therapy on the severity or progression of recurrent HCC., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

This document, written by the French Association for the Study of the Liver (AFEF) board, aims to provide information to physicians involved in the care of patients with liver disease during the Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) epidemic. These are not based on a systematic review of the literature and a rigorous evaluation using the GRADE method. These are recommendations based on feedback from China available in the form of original articles or letters - for which the scientific evidence is often modest - and the rules put forward by American (1) and European (Boettler et al, 2020) hepatology societies, the French National Digestive Cancer Thesaurus (Di Fiore et al., 2020) and the Francophone Transplantation Society (4). These suggestions require adjustment according to the geographical particularities of the epidemic, available standard procedures and access to local resources. This document will be updated as regularly as possible according to the evolution of our knowledge and characteristics on the epidemic., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Background and Objective: To assess within the ANRS CO20-CUPIC cohort whether the viral load (VL) at week 2/week 6 for telaprevir/boceprevir-based triple therapy, respectively, was predictive of sustained virological response (SVR) in patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection and to study the relevance of this measurement to early diagnose drug resistance., Methods: Observational study of HCV genotype 1 patients with compensated cirrhosis (Child-Pugh A), non-responders to a prior course of interferon (IFN)-based therapy and who started triple therapy. Patients received either 12 weeks of telaprevir in combination with PEG-IFN/ribavirin (RBV), then 36 weeks of PEG-IFN/RBV, or 4 weeks of PEG-IFN/RBV, then 44 weeks of PEG-IFN/RBV and boceprevir., Results: A total of 262 patients were analyzed. For telaprevir-treated patients, 28% had undetectable VL at W2 of whom 81% achieved SVR12 whereas 67% had undetectable VL at W4 of whom 67% achieved SVR12. For boceprevir-treated patients 20% had undetectable VL at W6 and 86% of them achieved SVR12 whereas 36% had undetectable VL at W8 among whom 73% achieved SVR12. Five telaprevir-treated patients had a VL increase between W2 and W4 after a decrease between D0 and W2. Four of them did not achieve SVR12. Similarly, six boceprevir-treated patients had a VL increase between W6 and W8 after a decrease between D0 and W6. Five did not reach SVR12., Conclusions: The assessment of HCV RNA level after two weeks of triple therapy in cirrhotic non-responder patients is a good predictor of SVR. This assessment was useful to do an early diagnosis of viral breakthrough., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Background: The impact of the IL28B genotype on the real-life treatment decisions for patients infected with the hepatitis C virus (HCV) is unknown., Objective: To prospectively analyze the impact of IL28B genotype in HCV genotype 1 (G1)- or 4 (G4)-infected patients using buccal epithelial cell samples in real-life clinical practices., Patients and Methods: From October 2011 to March 2013, 1007 CHC patients were included among 127 French clinical centers., Results: The IL28B CC, CT, and TT genotype distribution was 252 (25%), 576 (57%), and 177 (18%), respectively. The treatment decisions were recorded and matched with the initial intentions for 433 patients. Multivariate analysis on intention to start treatment showed that patients with HCV G4 were less likely to be intended to be treated than HCV G1 patients (odds ratio [OR]=0.43 [95% CI 0.19-0.97], P=0.04); similarly HIV-HCV coinfected patients were less likely to be intended to be treated than HCV monoinfected patients (OR=0.20 [0.09-0.41], P<.0001); conversely, F3-F4 patients were more likely to be intended to be treated than F0-F2 patients (OR=2.24 [1.29-3.89], P=0.004). Multivariate analysis on final decision to treat showed that Patients with F3-F4 were more likely to be treated than others (OR=2.06 [1.26-3.38], P=0.004). Conversely, although P-values are not significant, patients recruited in public hospitals tended to be less treated (OR=0.65 [0.40-1.04], P=0.069), similarly to HIV-HCV coinfected patients (OR=0.55 [0.28-1.11], P=0.095)., Conclusion: Our study showed that the IL28B genotype is used for the management of HCV-infected patients. In the context of future treatments, IL28B genotyping may remain useful if it can be used to develop individualized treatment strategies, identifying patients who can be successfully treated with shorter, simpler, or cheaper regimens., (Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

The launch of first-generation protease inhibitors (PIs) was a major step forward in hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment. However, this major advance has, up to now, only been applicable to genotype-1 patients. Second-wave and second-generation PIs appear to achieve higher antiviral potency, with pan-genotype activities, fewer side-effects and potential activity against PI-resistant mutation by second-generation PIs, through more convenient daily administration. Other direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) include NS5B inhibitors such as nucleoside/nucleotide inhibitors (NIs) and non-nucleoside inhibitors (NNIs). NIs have similar efficacy across all genotypes and present with the highest barrier to resistance of all DAAs to date. PSI-7977, a pyrimidine nucleotide analogue, also has highly potent antiviral activity across all HCV genotypes. In combination with ribavirin in an interferon-free regimen, it can achieve a 100% sustained viral response (SVR) rate in genotype 2/3 treatment-naïve patients. In association with pegylated interferon and ribavirin (PR), it achieves an SVR of 91% in genotype-1 naïve patients. NNIs in association with PR appear to be less potent, but they may nonetheless play a key role in many of the combination trials including either PIs or NIs. NS5A inhibitors also exhibit highly potent antiviral activity. Evaluation of their activity in combination with PIs demonstrated for the first time that an interferon-free regimen can cure genotype-1b null-responder patients. Furthermore, quadruple therapy with PR can achieve a 100% SVR in genotype-1 null-responder patients. Other players in the field, such as cyclophilin inhibitors and therapeutic vaccines, may have a role in combination with DAAs. The near future of HCV treatment looks promising. However, whether or not DAA combinations will lead to an interferon-free regimen for all patients remains an open question., (Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) genomic variability is responsible for the complexity of the viral quasi-species and its evolution during the course of infection. The persistence of infected cells promotes the selection of drug-resistant strains. The development of nucleoside analogs without cross-resistance has provided a rationale for combination therapy. De novo combination, with low genetic barrier drugs, prevents the emergence of resistance in the short-term for drugs with a low genetic barrier and improves the control of infection. Long-term studies are needed to determine whether de novo combination is beneficial for analogs with a high genetic barrier as well. The add-on strategy is a standard in case of emergence of resistant mutants. This strategy needs to be implemented as early as possible before the virological breakthrough, especially if the viral suppression is sub-optimal. Clinical trials are mandatory in order to assess whether a) de novo combination is better than an early add-on strategy; and b) whether in case of sub-optimal viral suppression, an early add-on strategy is better in the long-term than a switch to a more potent drug with a high genetic barrier., (Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Nucleoside or nucleotide analogs (NUCs) are a major step forward in the treatment of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. Apart from their proven antiviral efficacy, these drugs have proved able to significantly improve liver fibrosis as short-term treatment. Using different definitions of fibrosis regression, after 1 year of treatment, improvement in liver fibrosis was observed among HBe antigen (HBeAg)-positive naive patients: 35-61% with lamivudine; 41% with adefovir; 68% with telbivudine; 39% with entecavir; and 74% with tenofovir. Among HBeAg-negative patients, after 1 year of treatment, improvement in liver fibrosis was seen in: 36-46% with lamivudine; 48% with adefovir; 56% with telbivudine; 36% with entecavir; and 71% with tenofovir. Long-term treatment is often required with NUCs; the response continue to improve over time, reaching up to 63% of patients with lamivudine and 71% of patients with adefovir, although the development of antiviral drug resistance can blunt any histological improvement. Also, there is now growing evidence that non-invasive methods of fibrosis diagnosis, such as surrogate markers, are likely to become as important as liver biopsy for taking the initial decision to biopsy and for treatment, and in the follow-up of treated chronic HBV patients.

The objective of this prospective, multicenter, observational study was to evaluate healthcare for hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infected drug abusers in France and to determine predictors of successful therapeutic intervention. A total of 170 drug users were recruited from 40 French centers. Three centers recruited 66 participants (38.8%), and one to eight patients each were enrolled from 37 other centers (n=104). A sustained viral response (SVR) was seen in 65 (38.2%) patients. SVR rates were significantly higher in compliant than in non-compliant patients (43.5% versus 23.9%; P=0.019), in patients from high- rather than low-recruiting centers (54.5% versus 27.9%; P<0.001) and in patients receiving Buprenorphine rather than methadone (48.1% versus 21.8%; P=0.001). In patients, who completed both the treatment and follow-up (n=94), SVR rate was 57.4%. Buprenorphine substitution therapy and genotypes 2 or 3 HCV infection were associated with significantly higher rates of SVR (P<0.01, for both comparisons). In conclusion, successful care of hepatitis requires an active treatment policy of every center toward drug addicts. Additional studies are needed to explore the difference in SVR with methadone versus Buprenorphine therapy.

Non-invasive markers of liver fibrosis, including biochemical scores using simple biochemical parameters and transient elastography (TE), have been developed over the past decade to either replace or reduce the need for liver biopsy (LB) in the assessment of liver fibrosis. Although their diagnostic accuracy in liver fibrosis is promising, around 20% of patients are likely to be misclassified if these tests or LB are used alone. However, using a combination of several biochemical scores (Fibropaca algorithm, Leroy algorithm) or one biochemical score with TE (Bordeaux algorithm) will increase diagnostic accuracy for fibrosis and reduce the need for LB. Stepwise combination algorithms of non-invasive scores (SAFE biopsy) also improve the diagnostic performance in chronic hepatitis C (CHC) compared with the use of a single non-invasive score. Other sequential stepwise algorithms have been developed in CHC with similar performance results. Comparisons of different combinations of non-invasive methods indicate that the SAFE biopsy, Fibropaca algorithm and Bordeaux algorithm are excellent and comparable in the non-invasive diagnosis of liver fibrosis in HCV patients, and will markedly reduce the need for LB. They may also be useful in clinical practice and particularly for large-scale screening of HCV patients.

New antiviral drugs, therapeutic vaccines and immunotherapies are interesting therapeutic option for treatment of chronic hepatitis B. Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and clevudine are very effective in suppressing viral load with lack of resistance at short term. However antiviral drug rarely eliminate the virus. Immunotherapies by inducing HBV - specific T-cell responses may contribute to virus control. Adoptive T-cell therapy is an interesting approach to eliminate persistently infected cells. Therapeutic vaccines with either protein-based or DNA vaccines induce an HBV - specific T-cell responses leading to a more often transient decrease of viral load. Combination of antiviral drug and therapeutic vaccines may be an interesting therapeutic option. However additional larger scale and more systematic studies of the understanding of HBV specific T-cell response have to be performed in order to select which patient can benefit of such therapies.

About half of patients with chronic hepatitis C do not respond to the current treatment combining pegylated interferon and ribavirin. One must distinguish the "false" non responders who did not receive an optimal treatment and the "true" non responders who received an optimal treatment. In "false" non responders, the management of the factors of non response (alcohol consumption, body overweight...) or the improvement of tolerability to therapy (anti-depressive therapy, erythropoietin...) may allow an optimized retreatment with a chance of viral eradication. On the opposite, in "true" non responders, the probability to obtain with retreatment a viral eradication is very low and one must envisage, in case of severe liver disease (fibrosis stage F3 or F4), maintenance therapy. The objective of maintenance therapy is to decrease the activity of the chronic hepatitis and stabilize fibrosis in order to decrease the risk of complications and hepatocellular carcinoma. The ongoing trials will determine the optimal schedule of maintenance therapy. The new antivirals, mainly protease inhibitors and polymerase inhibitors, will probably be used in triple therapy with pegylated interferon and ribavirin. The drugs, currently in phase 1 and 2, which will demonstrate their efficacy and safety, should not be available before several years.

Biochemical markers of liver fibrosis, because they can be tested noninvasively, reproducibly, and reliably, may constitute a true alternative to liver biopsies. Scores must be used only in the circumstances for which they have been validated. Scores for the Fibrotest-Actitest have been studied and validated most widely. Fibroscan, an imaging technique that uses transient elastrography to measures liver stiffness, has been validated acceptably for management of hepatitis C (HCV). General practitioners can order Fibroscan testing to assess the extent of hepatic lesions in patients with chronic HCV. Fibrotest and/or Fibroscan testing may replace liver biopsy in patients who can then receive first-or second-line treatment for HCV, regardless of genotype or transaminase levels. In the future, treatment decisions will probably rely on a combination (after validation) of these scores and on the development of genetic markers for fibrogenesis, to differentiate between patients highly likely and unlikely to develop serious fibrosis.

Objectives: This observational study aimed at evaluating the satisfaction of patients with chronic hepatitis C using the peginterferon (peg-IFN) alfa-2b pen device., Methods: Consecutive patients were included when prescribed the pen device. Self-administered questionnaires relating to the progress brought by the pen, convenience/comfort, and the mode and security of injection were completed after the first injection and at 12 weeks., Results: Six hundred and forty eight patients aged 45.7 +/- 12.1 years completed the 1st questionnaire; 70% were naive for any hepatitis C treatment. Five hundred and twenty five (81%) patients completed the 2nd questionnaire. Adherence to the pen device was >or=80% in more than 80% of the patients. Most (85%) patients declared that the pen brought important progress compared to traditional syringes. Satisfaction was high after the 1st injection and further increased 12 weeks later, with ease of use scoring 7.7 then 8.0 (P=0.007, 10-point scale), and rapidity of use scoring 8.0 then 8.2 (P=0.008); less painful injection scoring 7.9 at both time points. The proportion of self-injectors (no intervention of a health professional) increased from 32% to 58% (P<0.0001). Reasons for self-injecting were: easier injection (58%), no product/syringe handling (50%/41%), and assurance of exact dosing (45%)., Conclusion: Patients were satisfied with the peg-IFN alfa-2b pen device. The proportion of self-injectors doubled over 12 weeks. Good treatment adherence, which is mandatory for therapeutic success, is expected from use if this device.

One side effect of the immunomodulatory effect of interferon is the possible triggering or exacerbation of systemic or cutaneous sarcoidosis. We report two new cases and offer an exhaustive review of the literature. A 39-year-old man with type C chronic active hepatitis developed new respiratory symptoms and pulmonary infiltrates with hilar and mediastinal adenopathy after 7 months of treatment with pegylated interferon. The evolution was favourable after stopping treatment. The second patient developed cutaneous lesions after 6 months of treatment. Resolution occurred after the discontinuation of the treatment. In these two cases ribavirin was stopped before the first signs of sarcoidosis.

Objectives: The aim of this observational study in patients with chronic hepatitis C and treated with interferon alpha-2a was to assess 1) monitoring in everyday practice, 2) the acceptability of treatment and 3) the intensity of fatigue., Methods: Three hundred and fifty four patients were enrolled by physicians in both teaching and general hospitals, or private practice. Before treatment, clinical, epidemiological, and virological data were collected as well as a self-evaluation of fatigue using a visual analogic scale. Clinical follow-up was assessed every 3 months during treatment and 6 months after the end of treatment and included an evaluation of fatigue and the number of workdays missed due to sickness., Results: Two hundred and nineteen men and 135 women, mean age 45 +/- 13, were included. The epidemiological, histological and virological features of this group were similar to those patients usually treated for chronic hepatitis C. Before treatment, the mean measurement of fatigue was 41 on a scale from 0 (perfect form) to 100 (exhausted). Fatigue was unrelated to age, source of infection, biological activity, or histological score. It worsened in patients who stopped interferon after 3 or 6 months, but was stable in patients who continued treatment for 12 months. Fatigue decreased after the end of treatment and was unrelated to treatment response. The need to stop work was strongly related to the intensity of fatigue and the number of workdays missed due to sickness represented nearly two months out of three in 25% of active patients during the first quarter and in 15% of patients thereafter. 61% of patients self-injected interferon (mainly previous drug users) whereas 30% of patients used nurse care throughout treatment., Conclusion: This study not only provides a realistic evaluation of fatigue in patients with chronic hepatitis C, before, during and after treatment, but also highlights its social and economic consequences. It shows the need for further cost-effectiveness studies on new therapeutic strategies using combined treatments.

Objectives: To assess information that general practitioners had on hepatitis C and on the hepatitis C network in hospitals and private practice., Methodology: A national telephone survey of 604 general practitioners was conducted between March 18 and 23, 1998., Results: Screening and management of hepatitis C was important for 89% and 97% of general practitioners. Screening was performed in relation to the relative risk (IV drug users 89%, blood transfusion before 1991 88%). General practitioners wanted more information on treatment (54%), patient counselling (42%) and the potential risks of the disease (42%). Of 604 general practitioners, 6% were involved in a hepatitis C network, while 21% were involved in another network (drug users 9%, AIDS 8%). Of the 94% general practitioners who were not part of the network, 33% were willing to join a hepatitis C network. Only 56% were aware of a hepatitis C network (press article 30%, mailing 17% or local meeting 12%). The difficulties for the involvement of general practitioners were: lack of time, topics not adapted to daily practice and geographic constraints (74%), too few patients in their practice (52%), no need (38%), the idea itself of a network and lack of information (28%)., Conclusion: General practitioners screen patients at risk of hepatitis C. They want to be better informed about treatment, patient counselling, and the potential risks of hepatitis C. They are less involved in hepatitis C networks than in other networks (drug, AIDS). However, one third of general practitioners would like to be involved in a hepatitis C network. These results could be useful for implementing post-graduate courses and general practitioner training.