Search

We investigated the effects of nitrous oxide (N 2 O) on glycinergic inhibitory whole-cell and synaptic responses using a "synapse bouton preparation," dissociated mechanically from rat spinal sacral dorsal commissural nucleus (SDCN) neurons. This technique can evaluate pure single- or multi-synaptic responses from native functional nerve endings and enable us to accurately quantify how N 2 O influences pre- and postsynaptic transmission. We found that 70 % N 2 O enhanced exogenous glycine-induced whole-cell currents (I Gly ) at glycine concentrations lower than 3 × 10 -5 M, but did not affect I Gly at glycine concentrations higher than 10 -4 M. N 2 O did not affect the amplitude and 1/e decay-time of both spontaneous and miniature glycinergic inhibitory postsynaptic currents recorded in the absence and presence of tetrodotoxin (sIPSCs and mIPSCs, respectively). The decrease in frequency induced by N 2 O was observed in sIPSCs but not in mIPSCs, which was recorded in the presence of both tetrodotoxin and Cd 2+ , which block voltage-gated Na + and Ca 2+ channels, respectively. N 2 O also decreased the amplitude and increased the failure rate and paired-pulse ratio of action potential-evoked glycinergic inhibitory postsynaptic currents. N 2 O slightly decreased the Ba 2+ currents mediated by voltage-gated Ca 2+ channels in SDCN neurons. We found that N 2 O suppresses glycinergic responses at synaptic levels with presynaptic effect having much more predominant role. The difference between glycinergic whole-cell and synaptic responses suggests that extrasynaptic responses seriously modulate whole-cell currents. Our results strongly suggest that these responses may thus in part explain analgesic effects of N 2 O via marked glutamatergic inhibition by glycinergic responses in the spinal cord., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest None., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Effects of xenon (Xe) on whole-cell currents induced by glutamate (Glu), its three ionotropic subtypes, and GABA, as well as on the fast synaptic glutamatergic and GABAergic transmissions, were studied in the mechanically dissociated "synapse bouton preparation" of rat spinal sacral dorsal commissural nucleus (SDCN) neurons. This technique evaluates pure single or multi-synapse responses from native functional nerve endings and enables us to quantify how Xe influences pre- and postsynaptic transmissions accurately. Effects of Xe on glutamate (Glu)-, alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid (AMPA)-, kainate (KA)- and N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA)- and GABA A receptor-mediated whole-cell currents were investigated by the conventional whole-cell patch configuration. Excitatory and inhibitory postsynaptic currents (EPSCs and IPSCs) were measured as spontaneous (s) and evoked (e) EPSCs and IPSCs. Evoked synaptic currents were elicited by paired-pulse focal electric stimulation. Xe decreased Glu, AMPA, KA, and NMDA receptor-mediated whole-cell currents but did not change GABA A receptor-mediated whole-cell currents. Xe decreased the frequency and amplitude but did not affect the 1/e decay time of the glutamatergic sEPSCs. Xe decreased the frequency without affecting the amplitude and 1/e decay time of GABAergic sIPSCs. Xe decreased the amplitude and increased the failure rate (Rf) and paired-pulse ratio (PPR) without altering the 1/e decay time of both eEPSC and eIPSC, suggesting that Xe acts on the presynaptic side of the synapse. The presynaptic inhibition was greater in eEPSCs than in eIPSCs. We conclude that Xe decreases glutamatergic and GABAergic spontaneous and evoked transmissions at the presynaptic level. The glutamatergic presynaptic responses are the main target of anesthesia-induced neuronal responses. In contrast, GABAergic responses minimally contribute to Xe anesthesia., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

We evaluated the effects of N2O on synaptic transmission using a preparation of mechanically dissociated rat hippocampal CA3 neurons that allowed assays of single bouton responses evoked from native functional nerve endings. We studied the effects of N2O on GABAA, glutamate, AMPA and NMDA receptor-mediated currents (IGABA, IGlu, IAMPA and INMDA) elicited by exogenous application of GABA, glutamate, (S)-AMPA, and NMDA and spontaneous, miniature, and evoked GABAergic inhibitory and glutamatergic excitatory postsynaptic current (sIPSC, mIPSC, eIPSC, sEPSC, mEPSC and eEPSC) in mechanically dissociated CA3 neurons. eIPSC and eEPSC were evoked by focal electrical stimulation of a single bouton. Administration of 70% N2O altered neither IGABA nor the frequency and amplitude of both sIPSCs and mIPSCs. In contrast, N2O decreased the amplitude of eIPSCs, while increasing failure rates (Rf) and paired-pulse ratios (PPR) in a concentration-dependent manner. On the other hand, N2O decreased IGlu, IAMPA and INMDA. Again N2O did not change the frequency and amplitude of either sEPSCs of mEPSCs. N2O also decreased amplitudes of eEPSCs with increased Rf and PPR. The decay phases of all synaptic responses were unchanged. The present results indicated that N2O inhibits the activation of AMPA/KA and NMDA receptors and also that N2O preferentially depress the action potential-dependent GABA and glutamate releases but had little effects on spontaneous and miniature releases., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The acute effects of high-dose Li(+) treatment on glutamatergic and GABAergic transmissions were studied in the "synaptic bouton" preparation of isolated rat hippocampal pyramidal neurons by using focal electrical stimulation. Both action potential-dependent glutamatergic excitatory and GABAergic inhibitory postsynaptic currents (eEPSC and eIPSC, respectively) were dose-dependently inhibited in the external media containing 30-150 mM Li(+), but the sensitivity for Li(+) was greater tendency for eEPSCs than for eIPSCs. When the effects of Li(+) on glutamate or GABAA receptor-mediated whole-cell responses (IGlu and IGABA) elicited by an exogenous application of glutamate or GABA were examined in the postsynaptic soma membrane of CA3 neurons, Li(+) slightly inhibited both IGlu and IGABA at the 150 mM Li(+) concentration. Present results suggest that acute treatment with high concentrations of Li(+) acts preferentially on presynaptic terminals, and that the Li(+)-induced inhibition may be greater for excitatory than for inhibitory transmission., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

We evaluated the effects of propofol on synaptic transmission using a mechanically dissociated preparation of rat hippocampal CA3 neurons to allow assays of single bouton responses evoked from retained functional native nerve endings. We studied synaptic and extrasynaptic GABAA and glutamate receptor responses in a preparation in which experimental solutions rapidly accessed synaptic terminals. Whole-cell responses were evoked by bath application of GABA and glutamate. Synaptic inhibitory and excitatory postsynaptic currents (IPSC and EPSC) were measured as spontaneous and evoked postsynaptic responses. Evoked currents were elicited by focal electrical stimulation. Propofol (1-100 μM) enhanced extrasynaptic GABAA-receptor mediated responses but the increase at clinically relevant concentrations (1 μM) were minor. In contrast, 1 μM propofol significantly increased both the amplitude and frequency of spontaneous IPSCs (sIPSCs) and increased the amplitudes of evoked IPSCs (eIPSCs) while decreasing failure rates (Rf) and paired-pulse ratios (PPR). Decay times of sIPSCs and eIPSCs were significantly prolonged. Although propofol had no effect on extrasynaptic glutamate responses, only supra-clinical propofol concentrations (≥ 10 µM) increased the spontaneous EPSCs (sEPSCs, amplitudes and frequencies) but suppressed evoked EPSCs (eEPSCs decreased amplitudes with increased Rf and PPR). The decay phases of sEPSCs and eEPSCs were not changed. The propofol-induced changes in sEPSCs and eEPSCs resulted from presynaptic GABAA receptor-mediated depolarization, because these actions were blocked by bicuculline. These results suggest that propofol acts at presynaptic and postsynaptic GABAA receptors within GABAergic synapses, but also increases extrasynaptic GABA responses. Our results expand the locus of propofol actions to GABAergic and glutamatergic synapses., (© 2013 Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Examination of volatile anesthetic actions at single synapses provides more direct information by reducing interference by surrounding tissue and extrasynaptic modulation. We examined how volatile anesthetics modulate GABA release by measuring spontaneous or miniature GABA-induced inhibitory postsynaptic currents (mIPSCs, sIPSCs) or by measuring action potential-evoked IPSCs (eIPSCs) at individual synapses. Halothane increased both the amplitude and frequency of sIPSCs. Isoflurane and enflurane increased mIPSC frequency while sevoflurane had no effect. These anesthetics did not alter mIPSC amplitudes. Halothane increased the amplitude of eIPSCs, with a decrease in failure rate (Rf) and paired-pulse ratio. In contrast, isoflurane and enflurane decreased the eIPSC amplitude and increased Rf, while sevoflurane decreased the eIPSC amplitude without affecting Rf. Volatile anesthetics did not change kinetics except for sevoflurane, suggesting that presynaptic mechanisms dominate changes in neurotransmission. Each anesthetic showed somewhat different GABA-induced response and these results suggest that GABA-induced synaptic transmission cannot have a uniformly common site of action as suggested for volatile anesthetics. In contrast, all volatile anesthetics concentration-dependently enhanced the GABA-induced extrasynaptic currents. Extrasynaptic receptors containing α4 and α5 subunits are reported to have high sensitivities to volatile anesthetics. Also, inhibition of GABA uptake by volatile anesthetics results in higher extracellular GABA concentration, which may lead to prolonged activation of extrasynaptic GABAA receptors. The extrasynaptic GABA-induced receptors may be major site of volatile anesthetic-induced neurotransmission. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled 'Extrasynaptic ionotropic receptors'., (Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Pentobarbital (PB) modulates GABA(A) receptor-mediated postsynaptic responses through various mechanisms, and can directly activate the channel at higher doses. These channels exist both pre- and postsynaptically, and on the soma outside the synapse. PB also inhibits voltage-dependent Na⁺ and Ca²⁺ channels to decrease excitatory synaptic transmission. Just how these different sites of action combine to contribute to the overall effects of PB on inhibitory and excitatory synaptic transmission is less clear. To compare these pre- and postsynaptic actions of PB, we used a 'synaptic bouton' preparation of isolated rat hippocampal CA3 pyramidal neurons where we could measure in single neurons the effects of PB on spontaneous and single bouton evoked GABAergic inhibitory and glutamatergic excitatory postsynaptic currents (sIPSCs, sEPSCs, eIPSCs and eEPSCs), respectively. Low (sedative) concentrations (3-10 μM) of PB increased the frequency and amplitude of sIPSCs and sEPSCs, and also presynaptically increased the amplitude of both eIPSCs and eEPSCs. There was no change in current kinetics at this low concentration. At higher concentrations (30-300 μM), PB decreased the frequency, and increased the amplitude of sIPSCs, and presynaptically decreased the amplitude of eIPSCs. The current decay phase of sIPSCs and eIPSCs was increased. An increase in both frequency and amplitude was seen for sEPSCs, while the eIPSCs was also decreased by a bicuculline-sensitive presynaptic effect. The results confirm the multiple sites of action of PB on inhibitory and excitatory transmission and demonstrate that the most sensitive site of action is on transmitter release, via effects on presynaptic GABA(A) receptors. At low concentrations, however, both glutamate and GABA release is similarly enhanced, making the final effects on neuronal excitability difficult to predict and dependent on the particular systems involved and/or on subtle differences in susceptibility amongst individuals. At higher concentrations, release of both transmitters is decreased, while the postsynaptic effects to increase IPSPs and decrease EPSCs would be expected to both results in reduced neuronal excitability., (Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

General anesthetics modulate autonomic nervous system function including thermoregulatory control, which resides in the preoptic area of the anterior hypothalamus. However, the mechanism by which anesthetics modulate hypothalamic function remains unknown. We hypothesized that isoflurane increases norepinephrine release in the preoptic area and in the posterior hypothalamus causing hypothermia during anesthesia. To test this hypothesis, we performed a series of in vivo and in vitro studies in rats. In vivo studies: 1) Norepinephrine release was measured by microdialysis in the preoptic area or the posterior hypothalamus (n=9 each) before, during (30 min), and after (50 min) rats were anesthetized with 2% isoflurane. 2) In five rats, blood gases and arterial pressure were measured. 3) Body temperature changes (n=6 each) were measured after prazosin (0, 0.05, 0.5 microg), norepinephrine (0, 0.1, 1.0 microg), or 0.5 microg prazosin with 1.0 microg norepinephrine injection into the preoptic area. In vitro study: Norepinephrine release was measured from anterior or posterior hypothalamic slices (n=10 each) incubated with 0, 1, 2, or 4% isoflurane in Ca2+-containing buffer or with 4% isoflurane (n=10) in Ca2+-free buffer. Data were analyzed with repeated measures or factorial ANOVA and Student-Newman-Keuls tests. P<0.05 was significant. During anesthesia, norepinephrine release in the preoptic area was increased approximately 270%, whereas the release in the posterior hypothalamus remained unchanged. During emergence, posterior hypothalamic norepinephrine release increased by approximately 250% (P<0.05). Rectal temperature changes correlated with norepinephrine release from the preoptic area. Norepinephrine in the preoptic area enhanced isoflurane-induced hypothermia, while prazosin reversed it. Norepinephrine release from anterior hypothalamic slices increased at all isoflurane concentrations, but only at the highest concentration in posterior hypothalamic slices. Under Ca2+-free conditions, 4% isoflurane increased norepinephrine from both regions. These results suggest that augmentation of norepinephrine release in the preoptic area is responsible for hypothermia during general anesthesia.