1. Panretinal Photocoagulation Versus Ranibizumab for Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy: Patient-Centered Outcomes From a Randomized Clinical Trial.
- Author
-
Beaulieu WT, Bressler NM, Melia M, Owsley C, Mein CE, Gross JG, Jampol LM, and Glassman AR
- Subjects
- Activities of Daily Living, Automobile Driving, Diabetic Retinopathy drug therapy, Diabetic Retinopathy surgery, Female, Humans, Intravitreal Injections, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Outcome Assessment, Retinal Neovascularization drug therapy, Retinal Neovascularization surgery, Sickness Impact Profile, Surveys and Questionnaires, Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A antagonists & inhibitors, Visual Acuity physiology, Work Performance, Angiogenesis Inhibitors therapeutic use, Diabetic Retinopathy therapy, Laser Coagulation methods, Ranibizumab therapeutic use, Retinal Neovascularization therapy
- Abstract
Purpose: To compare patient-centered outcomes in patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) treated with ranibizumab vs panretinal photocoagulation (PRP)., Design: Randomized clinical trial., Methods: Setting: Multicenter (55 U.S. sites)., Patient Population: Total of 216 adults with 1 study eye out of 305 adults (excluding participants with 2 study eyes, because each eye received a different treatment) with PDR, visual acuity 20/320 or better, no history of PRP., Intervention: Ranibizumab (0.5 mg/0.05 mL) vs PRP., Main Outcome Measures: Change from baseline to 2 years in composite and prespecified subscale scores from the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-25 (NEI VFQ-25), University of Alabama Low Luminance Questionnaire (UAB-LLQ), and Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire (WPAIQ)., Results: For the NEI VFQ-25 and UAB-LLQ composite scores, ranibizumab-PRP treatment group differences (95% CI) were +4.0 (-0.2, +8.3, P = .06) and +1.8 (-3.5, +7.1, P = 0.51) at 1 year, and +2.9 (-1.5, +7.2, P = .20) and +2.3 (-2.9, +7.5, P = .37) at 2 years, respectively. Work productivity loss measured with the WPAIQ was 15.6% less with ranibizumab (-26.3%, -4.8%, P = .005) at 1 year and 2.9% (-12.2%, +6.4%, P = .54) at 2 years. Eighty-three ranibizumab participants (97%) were 20/40 or better in at least 1 eye (visual acuity requirement to qualify for an unrestricted driver's license in many states) at 2 years compared with 82 PRP participants (87%, adjusted risk ratio = 1.1, 95% CI: 1.0, 1.2, P = .005)., Conclusions: Though differences in some work productivity and driving-related outcomes favored ranibizumab over PRP, no differences between treatment regimens for PDR were identified for most of the other patient-centered outcomes considered., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.) more...
- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF