Search

Adaptive radiotherapy (ART) has been introduced to correct the radiation-induced anatomic changes in head and neck cases during a treatment course. This study evaluated the potential dosimetric benefits of applying a 3-phase adaptive radiotherapy protocol in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients compared with the nonadaptive single-phase treatment protocol. Ten NPC patients previously treated with this 3-phase radiation protocol using Hi-Art Tomotherapy were recruited. Two new plans, PII-ART and PIII-ART, were generated based on the up-to-date computed tomography (CT) images and contours and were used for treatment in phase two (PII; after 25th fraction) and phase three (PIII; after 35th fraction), respectively. To simulate the situation of no replanning, 2 hybrid plans denoted as PII-NART and PIII-NART were generated using the original contours pasted on the PII- and PIII-CT sets by CT-CT fusion. Dosimetric comparisons were made between the NART plans and the corresponding ART plans. In both PII- and PIII-NART plans, the doses to 95% of all the target volumes (D₉₅) were increased with better dose uniformity, whereas the organs at risk (OARs) received higher doses compared with the corresponding ART plans. Without replanning, the total dose to 1% of brainstem and spinal cord (D₁) significantly increased 7.87 ± 7.26% and 10.69 ± 6.72%, respectively (P = 0.011 and 0.001, respectively), in which 3 patients would have these structures overdosed when compared with those with two replannings. The total maximum doses to the optic chiasm and pituitary gland and the mean doses to the left and right parotid glands were increased by 10.50 ± 10.51%, 8.59 ± 6.10%, 3.03 ± 4.48%, and 2.24 ± 3.11%, respectively (P = 0.014, 0.003, 0.053, and 0.046, respectively). The 3-phase radiotherapy protocol showed improved dosimetric results to the critical structures while keeping satisfactory target dose coverage, which demonstrated the advantages of ART in helical tomotherapy of NPC., (Copyright © 2012 American Association of Medical Dosimetrists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The aim of this study is to evaluate the deficiencies in target coverage and organ protection of 2-dimensional radiation therapy (2DRT) in the treatment of advanced T-stage (T3-4) nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), and assess the extent of improvement that could be achieved with intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), with special reference to of the dose to the planning organ-at-risk volume (PRV) of the brainstem and spinal cord. A dosimetric study was performed on 10 patients with advanced T-stage (T3-4 and N0-2) NPC. Computer tomography (CT) images of 2.5-mm slice thickness of the head and neck were acquired with the patient immobilized in semi-extended-head position. A 2D plan based on Ho's technique, and an IMRT plan based on a 7-coplanar portals arrangement, were established for each patient. 2DRT was planned with the field borders and shielding drawn on the simulator radiograph with reference to bony landmarks, digitized, and entered into a planning computer for reconstruction of the 3D dose distribution. The 2DRT and IMRT treatment plans were evaluated and compared with respect to the dose-volume histograms (DVHs) of the targets and the organs-at-risk (OARs), tumor control probability (TCP), and normal tissue complication probabilities (NTCPs). With IMRT, the dose coverage of the target was superior to that of 2DRT. The mean minimum dose of the GTV and PTV were increased from 33.7 Gy (2DRT) to 62.6 Gy (IMRT), and 11.9 Gy (2DRT) to 47.8 Gy (IMRT), respectively. The D(95) of the GTV and PTV were also increased from 57.1 Gy (2DRT) to 67 Gy (IMRT), and 45 Gy (2DRT) to 63.6 Gy (IMRT), respectively. The TCP was substantially increased to 78.5% in IMRT. Better protection of the critical normal organs was also achieved with IMRT. The mean maximum dose delivered to the brainstem and spinal cord were reduced significantly from 61.8 Gy (2DRT) to 52.8 Gy (IMRT) and 56 Gy (2DRT) to 43.6 Gy (IMRT), respectively, which were within the conventional dose limits of 54 Gy for brainstem and of 45 Gy for spinal cord. The mean maximum doses deposited on the PRV of the brainstem and spinal cord were 60.7 Gy and 51.6 Gy respectively, which were above the conventional dose limits. For the chiasm, the mean dose maximum and the dose to 5% of its volume were reduced from 64.3 Gy (2DRT) to 53.7 Gy (IMRT) and from 62.8 Gy (2DRT) to 48.7 Gy (IMRT), respectively, and the corresponding NTCP was reduced from 18.4% to 2.1%. For the temporal lobes, the mean dose to 10% of its volume (about 4.6 cc) was reduced from 63.8 Gy (2DRT) to 55.4 Gy (IMRT) and the NTCP was decreased from 11.7% to 3.4%. The therapeutic ratio for T3-4 NPC tumors can be significantly improved with IMRT treatment technique due to improvement both in target coverage and the sparing of the critical normal organ. Although the maximum doses delivered to the brainstem and spinal cord in IMRT can be kept at or below their conventional dose limits, the maximum doses deposited on the PRV often exceed these limits due to the close proximity between the target and OARs. In other words, ideal dosimetric considerations cannot be fulfilled in IMRT planning for T3-4 NPC tumors. A compromise of the maximal dose limit to the PRV of the brainstem and spinal cord would need be accepted if dose coverage to the targets is not to be unacceptably compromised. Dosimetric comparison with 2DRT plans show that these dose limits to PRV were also frequently exceeded in 2DRT plans for locally advanced NPC. A dedicated retrospective study on the incidence of clinical injury to neurological organs in a large series of patients with T3-4 NPC treated by 2DRT may provide useful reference data in exploring how far the PRV dose constraints may be relaxed, to maximize the target coverage without compromising the normal organ function.

A cell kinetic study of 27 newly diagnosed patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) using the in vitro bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) technique was performed. The results were reproducible as demonstrated by three independent sections performed on each patient. No correlation between BrdU labelling index (LI) and Ho's clinical staging was found. A higher LI was associated with the development of distant metastases (P = 0.057). Statistically significant correlation was found between low LI and longer duration required to achieve complete remission in the primary site of disease (P = 0.026). This study suggests a potential role for in vitro BrdU labelling index as a prognosticator for NPC prior to treatment.

A retrospective study on 422 nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients with cervical nodal metastases treated between 1984 and 1987 was performed. 169 received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (CHEMO) with cisplatinum and 5-fluorouracil for two or three courses prior to definitive radiotherapy and 253 were treated by radical radiotherapy alone (NCHEMO). While the primary tumour (T-stage) prognosticators had been comparable between the two groups, CHEMO had significantly more advanced cervical nodal metastases with bulkier nodes and more low-cervical and supraclavicular nodes (P < 0.05) which could account for its overall worse survival, poorer regional tumour control and a trend towards worse systemic tumour control. The worse regional control in CHEMO for Ho's N1 could be the result of more bulky nodes and more tumours infiltrating the skull base and/or causing cranial nerve(s) palsy. There was no statistical or apparent difference between CHEMO and NCHEMO for the same Ho's overall stages of NPC with comparable nodal and primary tumour characteristics for the clinical endpoints of actuarial survival rate (ASR), disease-free survival rate (DFS), free of local failure survival rate (FLF), and free from distant metastases survival rate (FDM), despite the presence of significantly more fixed nodes and bulky nodes. This suggests a possible beneficial effect of the neoadjuvant chemotherapy. However, multivariate analysis has not shown the administration of the neoadjuvant chemotherapy to be of prognostic significance. Even though the chemotherapy was well tolerated with little toxicity, we recommend against the routine use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in cervical-node-positive NPC outside the context of a prospective randomised clinical trial.