Search

Introduction: The extremely good results of renal transplantation have favored the use of pre-emptive procedures for treatment of patients with end-stage renal disease before entering dialysis, but still some concerns exist about patient survival. The aim of this study was to analyze the evolution of death rates and the causes of mortality among recipients of procedures performed between 1970 and 2007., Methods: We examined the outcomes at 1, 5, 10, and 15 years follow-up of 793 adults who underwent primary or repeat renal transplantation from living or deceased donors between January 1, 1970 and December 31, 2007. To evaluate the impact of immunosuppressive regimens on patient survivals, we considered 3 time intervals: the precyclosporine era, the cyclosporine era, and the postcyclosporine era., Results: During follow-up 115/793 (14.5%) renal transplant recipients died. There was a significant decrease in the overall mortality rate over the years. Patients who underwent transplantation more recently in the postcyclosporine era (1997-2007) showed a mortality rate of 1.8% (7/394) at 1 year and 3.3% (13/394) at 5 years, significantly lower than in previous periods. There was no significant change in the most frequent causes of death: cardiovascular diseases and sepsis., Conclusion: Our data indicated a significant improvement in patient survival after renal transplantation over the last decade. These data are significantly better than those reported for dialysis treatment thus supporting the strategy of pre-emptive transplantation for end-stage renal disease., (Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: It is unclear whether the presence of vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) after renal transplantation compromises long-term graft function. The aim of this study in renal allograft recipients with a history of late recurrent urinary tract infections (UTI) was to determine whether the presence of VUR conferred an increased risk of long-term graft dysfunction., Methods: We included 37 renal allograft recipients, who were at least 2 years after transplantation and had a history of at least 1 recurrent UTI per year underwent voiding cystourethrograms (VCUG). The presence and severity of VUR were graded with severity scores ranging from G1 to G5., Results: Of the 37 patients, 15 (41%) showed low grades of reflux (G1-3) on VCUG. Patient and graft survivals were not significantly different in the VUR group (n = 15) compared with the no VUR group (n = 22) at 1, 3, or 5 years. Renal function assessment by means of serum creatinine (Cr) concentration also demonstrated similar results in both groups at 1, 3, and 5 years: 5 y mean Cr: VUR 1.5 +/- 0.6 mg/dL versus no VUR 1.8 +/- 1.1 mg/dL (P = NS). No difference was also observed in the 2 groups in the number of UTI episodes for each patient per year., Conclusions: In patients with late UTIs, the presence of low-grade VUR did not affect long-term graft function. There was no indication for a operative repair of low-grade VUR.

Objective: The aim of this prospective study was to compare the cardiovascular risk (CVR) profile in patients treated with 2 different immunosuppressive regimens: tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil (TAC) compared with everolimus and low-dose cyclosporine (EVL)., Patients and Methods: Sixty consecutive renal transplant recipients prospectively assigned to TAC (n = 30) or to EVL (n = 30) were followed for 6 months. TAC group immunosuppression consisted of basiliximab, tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), and steroid. EVL group immunosuppression consisted of basiliximab, everolimus, and low doses of cyclosporine and steroid. Main CVR factors analyzed were: hypertension, dyslipidemia, posttransplant diabetes mellitus, and weight gain., Results: Six months posttransplantation, patients in the EVL group showed significantly higher mean serum cholesterol (P < .003) and serum triglyceride levels (P < .027), as well as a greater number of patients were receiving statin treatment (P < .05). Mean systolic blood pressure, mean diastolic blood pressure, number of patients treated for hypertension, number of antihypertensive medications prescribed per patient, posttransplant weight gain, and posttransplant diabetes mellitus were not significantly different among the EVL and TAC groups after 1, 3, and 6 months posttransplantation., Conclusions: This study showed that at 6 months posttransplantation, patients on EVL displayed significantly greater dyslipidemia with respect to the TAC group. A longer follow-up will be necessary to discover whether the presence of everolimus in the immunosuppressive regimen provides significant benefits for the CVR of renal transplant recipients.

Objective: The aim of this study in renal transplant recipients was to compare a tacrolimus plus mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) immunosuppressive regimen with a combination of low dose of cyclosporine and everolimus., Patients and Methods: Sixty consecutive patients were prospectively assigned to receive tacrolimus and MMF (TAC; n = 30) or everolimus and low-dose cyclosporine (EVL; n = 30). Tacrolimus was dosed seeking a trough blood level of 8 to 10 ng/mL by month 3 and 5 to 8 ng/mL thereafter. Everolimus was dosed seeking a trough blood level of 3 to 8 ng/mL by day 7. Cyclosporine was dosed aiming at a C2 blood level of 350 to 700 ng/mL in the first week and 150 to 400 ng/mL thereafter. All patients received induction with basiliximab and maintenance treatment with corticosteroids., Results: At 6-months follow-up, patient survival rates (TAC 100% vs EVL 100%) and graft survival rates (TAC 96.7% vs EVL 93.3%) were not significantly different between the groups. Patients in the EVL group showed more acute rejection episodes, but serum creatinine concentrations and creatinine clearances were not significantly different from the TAC group. Among the observed side effects, hypercholesterolemia was significantly higher in the EVL group (total cholesterol: TAC 206 +/- 38 vs EVL 250 +/- 55 mg/dL; P < .003)., Conclusions: This study showed that the immunosuppressive association of tacrolimus and MMF produced similar acute rejection episodes, graft survivals, and renal function at 6 months after renal transplantation compared with an immunosuppressive combination of everolimus and low-dose cyclosporine. Dyslipidemia was significantly greater among patients who received everolimus.

Successful treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection can prevent reinfection after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). Pegylated interferon (PEG-IFN) may ameliorate virological response (VR), making the risk-to-benefit ratio of therapy favorable in waiting list patients. From January 2001 to April 2006, we treated 15 HCV cirrhotics with PEG-IFN alpha-2b (1.5 microg/kg/week) and ribavirin (RIBA; >or=10.6 mg/kg/d). Their mean age was 51.5 years. There were 9 men. In 6 cases the genotype was 1b. With Child-Pugh scores >or=9 (range 9-12) and Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) scores >or=14 (range, 14-22). Adverse events occurred in all subjects: thrombocytopenia (<40,000/microL) in 8; neutropenia (<700/microL) in 10; anemia (Hb <8.5 g/dL) in 1; grade III hepatic encephalopathy in 2; pelvic infection in 1; variceal hemorrhage in 1; and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) recurrence in 1. Adverse events caused treatment withdrawal in 6 (40.0%) and RIBA and/or PEG-IFN dose reduction in 10 (66.6%). Early VR (EVR) was obtained in 9 subjects (60.0%), end-of-treatment (EOT) VR in 7 (46.6%), and sustained VR (SVR) in 3 (20.0%). Three subjects--2 nonresponder and 1 breakthrough--were transplanted at 25, 23, and 16 months after the EOT, respectively. Three subjects died at 6, 8, and 15 months after the EOT due to HCC, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, and liver failure. Nine patients are awaiting OLT. The risk-to-benefit ratio is against PEG-INF and RIBA treatment of severely decompensated cirrhotics infected with genotype 1 awaiting OLT, but therapy is probably beneficial in genotype 2 subjects, due to an expected SVR rate of more than 40%. However, one must carefully consider the high risk for severe adverse events.

Various artificial liver support systems are currently used in patients with decompensated chronic liver disease or acute liver failure as a bridge to recovery or to orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). Between June 2004 and September 2006, 9 subjects were treated with plasma exchange (PE) for acute decompensation on chronic liver disease or chronic decompensation in end-stage liver disease. All of them were awaiting OLT or were listed at the moment of decompensation. Grade II to III hepatic encephalopathy (HE) was present in 4 patients, significant renal dysfunction in 3 patients, and ascites in 6 patients. Baseline serum total bilirubin was 35.1+/-11.2 mg/dL (mean value+/-SD). The patients underwent a mean of 12.1 2-hour exchanges over 1 to 8 weeks. The 3 who recovered were alive after a mean follow-up of 22.7+/-10.3 months. There were 3 patients who underwent transplantation and 3 who died due to liver failure during treatment. Only subjects with acute decompensation and without HE or significant renal dysfunction survived without OLT. PE did not significantly modify the grade of HE or the renal function. PE seemed to be a safe, long-term, effective therapeutic option for acute decompensation among subjects with chronic liver disease without brain or renal dysfunction.

The indications for liver transplantation among patients with post-hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related cirrhosis have changed over the past 35 years. We reviewed the long-term results of 47 patients treated with liver transplantation for HBV-related cirrhosis. Patients were classified into 3 groups according to the perioperative regimen. In the initial experience, no immunoprophylaxis was adopted (no-IP; n=5). From 1988-1996, an immunoprophylaxis scheme was adopted (HBIg; n=16). From 1997-2007, we adopted the combination of lamivudine and HBIg (LAM-HBIg; n=26). We calculated the prevalence of serological reinfection and patient survival at 1 to 20 years, using the 3 regimens. The recurrence rate was 75% in the group of untreated patients; 30% in the HBIg group; and 9% in the LAM-HBIg group. The overall survival was 67% at 5 years, and 64% at 10 and 20 years. The long-term survival for each of the 3 therapeutic approaches, namely, for the patients who did not receive any treatment, for the HBIg group, and for the LAM-HBIg group, were 20%, 50%, and 84%, respectively. We suggest to use the LAM-HBIg combination.

In recent studies, nonstandard donors and high Model for End-stage Liver Disease (MELD) values have been indicated as risk factors for both graft survival and patient survival. A recent debate concerns which donor and recipient match guarantees the best results in terms of early and late survival. To emphasize the role of the donor-recipient match, we have reported herein a complex case of a patient who changed his preoperative risk status, being transplanted three times using donors of different risk levels. At each transplant, the patient moved to a higher MELD class: first transplant MELD=22; second transplant MELD=37; third transplant MELD=38. Only at the third transplant did the patient recover. Besides the liver, almost all his organs (kidneys, heart, lungs) recovered in a few weeks, as well. Unfortunately, severe cortical and subcortical brain damage remained a crucial limiting impairment, leading to death 5 months later, due to pulmonary infection, yet with a perfectly working liver. We underlined the role of donor factors to predict the outcome after liver transplantation in the MELD era.

In liver transplantation the identification of risk factors and the risk quantification for each single case represent a field of great interest. There are donor-related and recipient-related risk factors. Donor risk index (DRI) was retrospectively calculated in 223 liver transplant cases. We did not include patients with preoperative diagnosis of hepatocarcinoma and retransplants. The cases were stratified into two classes according to the DRI (low risk, DRI<1.7, and high risk, DRI >or= 1.7). A new index, namely the organ patient index (OPI) was calculated adding the Model for End-stage Liver Disease (MELD) score to the DRI. Patients were stratified into two classes according to the OPI (low risk, OPI 2.85). The cases with low DRI (n=144) showed better survival than the cases with high DRI (n=82; P< .02). The cases with low OPI (n=173) showed better survival than cases with high OPI (n=50; P< .01). The OPI predicted outcomes better than DRI, increasing the gap in the long-term graft survival between the low- and the high-risk class. The inclusion of the MELD in the new index allowed better prediction of graft survival.

Everolimus (EVL) has shown a potential to reduce nephrotoxicity associated with cyclosporine (CsA) while providing similar protection against rejection. We analyzed the incidence of acute rejection episodes (ARE) among 20 cadaveric renal transplant recipients treated with the combination of EVL + CsA. Immunosuppression consisted of basiliximab induction given pretransplant and on day 4 posttransplant; EVL at a starting dose of 1.5 mg/day followed by concentration control to trough levels of 3 to 8 ng/mL by day 7; CsA at a starting dose of 4 mg/kg per day and then concentration controlled with C2 monitoring (C2 500-700 ng/mL); and steroids in a tapering regimen to reach 5 mg by day 30. The overall incidence of ARE was 25%. On postoperative day 7, patients with ARE showed significantly lower mean EVL trough concentrations compared with those not experiencing ARE (NO ARE: 2.2 +/- 2.1 ng/mL vs 4.8 +/- 2.4 ng/mL) (P = .05). The CsA C2 values were close to the lower end of the target range on day 3 (583 +/- 334 ng/mL). All rejecting grafts were functioning at 3 months posttransplantations, but mean serum creatinine was higher in the ARE group (ARE 2.2 +/- 0.7 mg/dL vs 1.1 +/- 0.2 NO ARE; P = .04). In conclusion, whenever EVL is used in combination with CsA to protect kidney transplant patients against the risk of acute rejection, a threshold of 3 ng/mL must be reached in the first week posttransplantation. We suggest careful monitoring of EVL exposure and increased EVL starting doses.

We reviewed the incidence and the impact of posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorders (PTLDs) on patient survival among a consecutive series of 255 patients. Five cases of PTLD were observed in adults: two cases were early (less than 1 year) and three cases, late lymphomas. The EBV positivity and the degree of immunosuppression were the main risk factors. We labeled cases as early or late according to whether the time elapsed from the transplant to the first clinical evidence of PTLD was less than 12 months. The median time from transplant to diagnosis of PTLD was 8 (early) and 108 (late) months. All cases were treated by reduction in immunosuppressive therapy with conventional chemotherapy and rituximab. The early cases with lymphoma located at the hepatic hilum died due to local complications (biliary sepsis and hemobilia), after an initial partial response to chemotherapy. The three patients with late cases are in remission after a mean follow-up of 23 months.

MELD and PELD scores of 255 consecutive grafts were calculated (236 adult cases and 19 pediatric cases). No correction for the etiology of liver disease was performed. Retransplants were excluded. Three categories of patients were identified: low MELD (scores <12, n = 61); intermediate MELD (scores between 12-24, n = 159); high MELD (scores > or =25, n = 35). Grafts were categorized according to donor quality: standard livers (n = 199), vs nonstandard livers (n = 56). Nonstandard livers were identified by age > or =60, or at least by two of the following conditions: severe hemodynamic instability, ultrasound evidence of steatosis, natriemia > or =155 mEq/L, ICU stay >7 days, liver trauma, protracted anoxia as cause of brain death, transaminases levels x 4. In standard livers, the 12-month graft survival (GS) for low, intermediate, and high MELD classes were 88%, 74%, and 77%, respectively. In nonstandard livers, the 12-month GS for the low, intermediate, and high MELD classes were 84%, 55%, and 44%, respectively; differences between low MELD class and both intermediate and high MELD classes were significant (P < .05). Cox regression analysis of all cases identified the following parameters as independent predictors of GS: donor status; donor age; and recipient creatinine. The highest correlation with GS was found using donor age and recipient creatinine as covariates. In standard livers no variable was able to predict GS. In nonstandard livers the MELD-PELD score was the unique variable able to predict GS. We suggest avoiding the use of nonstandard livers for patients with high MELD scores.

We assessed the safety and clinical efficacy of the Molecular Adsorbent Recirculating System (MARS) in liver failure patients admitted to our intensive care unit (ICU) from May 2000 to February 2006. Of 28 adult patients with bilirubin >15 mg/dL and hepatic encephalopathy (HE) grade > or =2 or hepato-renal syndrome, 22 patients were included in the study, because 6 patients were older than 65 years of age or showed recent alcohol abuse or extrahepatic malignancy. Patients were assigned to 2 groups according to whether MARS therapy was associated with a transplantation procedure: 11 patients received MARS therapy and liver transplantation (OLT group) and 11 patients received MARS therapy alone (non-OLT group). Five of 11 patients in the OLT group were listed for transplantation and 6 patients with graft failure for retransplantation. The patients in the OLT and non-OLT groups were similar in MELD, SOFA, and SAPS scores. All patients were stable and free from complications. MARS significantly reduced bilirubin, bile acids, and blood urea nitrogen (BUN) levels in both groups (P < .05), whereas a significant decrease in ammonia level was observed in the OLT group. Patient survival rates at 3 and 6 months in the OLT group were 91% and 73%, respectively, and in the non-OLT group, 9% and 9%, respectively (P < .001). MARS was safe and well tolerated, improving biochemical parameters, neurological function, and pruritus. In terms of survival, the use of MARS alone was not effective due to the high rate of multiple organ failure. Nevertheless, the association of MARS with a transplant/retransplantation procedure was highly effective.

We described the characteristics of livers already labeled as marginal, nonstandard, or selected with extended criteria: donors of elderly age, steatosis, hemodynamic instability, long cold ischemia time, high serum Na, HbcAb-positive status, HCVAb-positive status. Recipients characteristics (gender, UNOS status, MELD score, indication for transplantation) and their best possible match to nonstandard donors were evaluated with a report of the recent guidelines and the specific algorithms to optimize recipient identification.

The University of Wisconsin solution (UW) and the Bretschneider solution (HTK) were used in 39 adult cadaveric donors: 22 perfused with UW (group 1) and 17 with HTK (group II). Donors were flushed through the aorta (UW, 5 to 6 L; HTK, 8 to 10 L) and through the portal vein (UW or HTK, 1 L). Grafts perfused with HTK showed lower levels of SGOT at postoperative day 7 than those transplanted with UW (38 +/- 19 vs 58 +/- 31, P < .05). No difference was observed in other functional and outcome parameters. No cases of primary dysfunction were observed. Six-month graft survival was 85.7% in HTK group and 80.9% in UW group (P = NS). Six unrelated deaths were observed. Five biliary complications were observed in five patients: three in the UW group and two in the HTK group. In conclusion, data fail to show major differences between the two solutions used.

Lymphocele is a complication of renal transplantation, representing a lymphatic collection around the grafted kidney. The use of the immunosuppressive agent sirolimus (SRL) has been associated with a significant increase in lymphocele formation. This complication has been related to the antiproliferative activity of SRL, which delays surgical wound repair and closure of injured lymphatic vessels. The aim of this study was to relate the incidence of lymphocele with immunosuppression among 158 renal transplant patients operated with routine closure of all the visible lymphatic vessels around the iliac vessels and at the renal hilum. The incidence of lymphocele was not significantly different among the various immunosuppressive regimens.

Sirolimus (SRL) in combination with Cyclosporine A (CsA) and steroids has been shown to lower the incidence of acute renal allograft rejection episodes, allowing CsA sparing. We retrospectively compared the incidence of posttransplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM) among kidney transplant recipients (KTx) immunosuppressed with SRL + CsA versus CsA alone. Patients were divided into two groups: SRL + CsA (n = 38) versus CsA (n = 48). Mean follow-up was 53.9 +/- 17.1 months. Seventeen/86 subjects (19.8%) developed diabetes after transplantation (7 IFG, 8.1%; 10 PTDM, 11.6%). The incidence was significantly higher in SRL + CsA (12/38 patients, 31.6%) compared with CsA (5/43 patients, 10.4%) (P = .0144, odds ratio 3.97). More patients required treatment in the SRL + CsA compared to CsA alone cohort (13.2% vs 2.1%, P = .051): 4 pts (10.5%) became insulin- dependent among SRL+CsA, vs none in the CsA group. Use of OHD was similar in both groups (2.6% SRL + CsA vs 2.1% CsA). There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of age, sex distribution, BMI, or serum creatinine at 1 to 3 and 5 years from transplantation. All PTDM patients are alive at follow-up, while two grafts were lost due to chronic renal allograft dysfunction. Within the limits of a small retrospective study, we observed that SRL in combination with CsA increased the diabetogenic potential of CsA. A possible explanation of our findings is that higher CsA doses were used in the early experience with SRL + CsA; therefore the higher incidence of PTDM that we observed in the SRL + CsA combination may be a sign of toxicity. Careful monitoring of blood levels is mandatory in the SRL + CsA combination to avoid pleiotropic toxicity.

The model for End-stage Liver Disease (MELD) has been adopted by the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) in 2002 as the standard priority rule for the liver transplantation waiting list. We retrospectively calculated the pretransplant MELD scores of 226 consecutive adult grafts. We did not correct for hepatocellular carcinoma comorbidity or for the etiology of liver disease. Cases were categorized according to the MELD score: class I, MELD scores between 6 and 14 (low MELD, n = 116); class II, MELD score between 15 and 24 (intermediate MELD, n = 78); class III, MELD score between 25 and 42 (high MELD, n = 32). All patients were transplanted using deceased donors. Grafts were categorized also according to donor quality (standard donor vs nonstandard donor). Sorting into categories was performed before transplant by officers of the Central-South Italian Transplant Organization overregional organ procurement agencies, namely OCST. Differences in Kaplan-Meier graft survivals (GS) between low MELD class and high MELD class were statistically significant (P < .01). Among standard donors, the 6-month GS were 83%, 94%, and 63% for the low, intermediate, and high MELD subset, respectively, differences that did not reach statistical significance. Among nonstandard donors, the 6-month GS were 77%, 71%, and 38% for the low, intermediate, and high MELD classes, respectively. Differences between low MELD class and intermediate MELD class and between low MELD class and high MELD class were statistically significant (P < .01). We strongly suggest that the utilization of nonstandard organs should be avoided for patients with high MELD scores.

The hockey-stick surgical incision is becoming more popular than the oblique incision for kidney transplantations. Both incisions are convenient and comfortable. Both have some drawbacks, such as muscle denervation for the former, or section of lateral muscles for the latter. In this retrospective study, we compared these incisions with regard to the incidence of long-term complications, such as postincisional hernia, relaxation of the abdominal wall, and a poor cosmetic result. One hundred patients (50 of each type) were evaluated at an average of 4.5 years after transplantation (3 months-15 years). Occurrence of incisional hernia was 16% in the former (8 cases) versus 4% in the latter (2 cases: X(2) = 4; P < .05). A major relaxation of the abdominal wall was found in 24% of the former (12 cases) versus 8% of the latter (4 cases) (X(2) = 4.76; P < .05). These complications were not correlated with age, sex, weight, side of transplant, or immunosuppressive drugs. In the former patients with hockey-stick incisions, the overall cosmetic results were poor, because in most cases the incision had been prolonged upward, above the transverse umbilical line, even as high as the costal arch. In 20% of the former patients with hockey-stick incisions, the scar had widened, particularly in the upper vertical branch of the J incision. We conclude that the final outcome of the oblique surgical incision was better than the hockey-stick incision because of the lower incidence of hernia and abdominal wall relaxation and the more favorable cosmetic results.

Background: Abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) requiring surgical management are encountered more frequently in renal transplant recipients, presenting an important technical problem during the repair. The aim of the present study was to analyze the epidemiology and natural evolution of AAA among renal allograft recipients., Methods: Three hundred ninety-four renal transplant recipients were periodically evaluated with abdominal aortic ultrasound tomography for AAA. The indication for surgery was a maximal diameter >5 cm. Renal function, graft, and patient survival were evaluated after a mean follow-up of 51 months., Results: Four AAA were detected in 394 renal transplant recipients, a prevalence of 1.01%. All of the AAA were found in male recipients of mean age 59.2 +/- 5.5 years and mean time posttransplantation of 82.7 +/- 77.3 months. The mean follow-up period between diagnosis and indication for surgery was 14.2 +/- 10.8 months. Two patients underwent open repair with aneurysmectomy and conventional tube graft positioning, and 2 patients refused surgical repair. To preserve renal graft function during the aortic cross-clamping phase, cold perfusion with 4 degrees C Ringer acetate and local hypothermia with sterile ice were used. Renal function did not change after the operation (preoperative serum creatinine levels were 1.2 and 1.3 mg/dL; postoperative 1.3 and 1.5 mg/dL respectively). The 2 patients who underwent surgery are alive with excellent graft functioning after a follow-up of 1.5 and 7 years, respectively. The 2 patients who refused surgical treatment are dead., Conclusions: Yearly ultrasound screening for AAA must be recommended in renal transplant recipients as part of the routine posttransplantation follow-up. De novo AAA occurs in younger subject in the transplant population and shows a faster evolution.

Two hundred seventy-six liver transplants were retrospectively reviewed to analyze 6-month graft survival in relation to the combination of donor quality (standard donor vs nonstandard donor) and risk related to the severity of recipient liver disease low-risk, ie, United Network for Organ Sharing [UNOS] status 3/2b; high-risk, ie, UNOS status 1/2a). The overall 6-month survival rate of 82% was stratified into 4 classes: (1) standard donor to low-risk recipient = 88%; (2) standard donor to high-risk recipient = 86%; (3) nonstandard donor to low-risk recipient = 84%; and (4) nonstandard donor to high-risk recipient = 67%. According to the observed graft survival in the 4 different classes, 2 simulations were performed: the "match simulation" (transplantation of all low-risk recipients using standard donors, and transplantation of all high-risk recipients using nonstandard donors), and the "mismatch simulation" (transplantation of all the high-risk patients using low-risk donors and transplantation of low-risk patients using high-risk donors). The 6-month survival rates, calculated using the match simulation, were 74% and using the mismatch simulation, 84%. The authors suggest that, in the era of marginal donors, the recipient should be selected in relation to the characteristics of the donor according to the mismatch model.

Unlabelled: End-stage renal disease is associated with disorders in hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal function. Immunosuppressive therapies may influence the restoration of normal levels of gonadal hormones after renal transplantation. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the hormonal status of successful renal transplant recipients who were treated with different immunosuppressive agents., Methods: Testosterone, luteinizing hormone (LH), and follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) were measured in 59 male renal transplant recipients with stable graft function with serum creatinine <2.5 mg/dL. Patients were treated with three different immunosuppressive regimens: group I, calcineurin inhibitors (CI; n = 15), group II, sirolimus without calcineurin inhibitors (SRL; n = 15), group III, sirolimus in combination with calcineurin inhibitors (SRL * CI; n = 29)., Results: Testosterone was significantly lower in group II versus group I (3.12 +/- 1.23 versus 4.39 +/- 1.53 ng/mL; P < .0197). Group III had higher testosterone values than group II, but lower than group I. FSH and LH were also higher in the SRL group, but the differences were not statistically significant, perhaps because of the small number of patients. No relationship was found between testosterone blood levels and age, posttransplant follow-up, renal function, time on dialysis, body mass index, steroid use, or posttransplant diabetes., Conclusion: Sirolimus seems to impair the improvement of gonadal function after renal transplantation. Further prospective studies are needed to confirm these data before patients are advised of this potential side effect.

New-onset diabetes mellitus (NODM) is associated with increased risk of graft failure and death in renal transplant recipients. Some clinical studies have indicated that NODM risk is higher with tacrolimus than cyclosporine, but no comparative trial has used American Diabetic Association (ADA)/World Health Organization (WHO) criteria for diagnosis of diabetes mellitus. The Diabetes Incidence After Renal Transplantation, Neoral C2 Monitoring Versus Tacrolimus (DIRECT) study is a 6-month open-label, multicenter trial comparing the impact of tacrolimus and Neoral (cyclosporine microemulsion) on glucose metabolism in 700 de novo kidney transplant recipients, based on ADA/WHO criteria. Patients are randomized to tacrolimus (C0 monitoring) or Neoral (C2 monitoring), stratified by baseline diabetic status and ethnicity. All patients receive basiliximab, corticosteroids, and mycophenolate mofetil or enteric-coated mycophenolate acid (myfortic). Pooled interim 3-month results from a subset of 115 patients receiving either tacrolimus or Neoral showed that the primary efficacy end-point (biopsy-proven acute rejection [BPAR], graft loss or death) occurred in 11 patients (10%). There were four graft losses and only one death, which occurred after graft loss. Eight patients experienced BPAR (7.3%). Among 99 patients who were nondiabetic at baseline, 14 developed NODM by month 3, 17 developed impaired fasting glucose or impaired glucose tolerance, and another 5 patients received hypoglycemic treatment for at least 14 consecutive days or at the month 3 visit, resulting in a 36% incidence of impaired glucose metabolism. At 3 months, median GFR (Nankivell) was 63.7 mL/min; median serum creatinine was 137 micromol/L. Full complete results are expected in December 2005.

We report two kidney transplant recipients who developed severe limb lymphedema under sirolimus (SRL) immunosuppression. The patients received SRL 10 and 2 mg/d to achieve target levels of 10 to 20 ng/mL with tapering doses of prednisone. Renal function and drug levels were monitored monthly. Patient 1 developed lymphedema of the left upper limb 3 years posttransplantation, after having been exposed to high SRL doses in the preceding 2 years (mean SRL dose-9.5 mg/d, mean trough level-26.3 ng/mL, mean serum creatinine-1.63 mg/dL). In patient 2 lymphedema of both upper and lower right limbs occurred 18 months posttransplantation (mean SRL dose-3.2 mg/d, mean trough level-8.8 ng/mL, mean serum creatinine-2.9 mg/dL). Hypercholesterolemia and hypertriglyceridemia were also observed in both patients before SRL reduction/conversion. No signs of hematopoietic toxicity were observed. In both patients magnetic resonance (MR) angiography of the limb was negative for vascular obstruction, and lymphoscintigraphy revealed lymphatic obstruction. In patient 1 lymphedema improved significantly following SRL reduction and lymphatic drainage massage therapy. Patient 2 was converted to cyclosporine (CsA) improving markedly after conversion. Hypercholesterolemia and hypertriglyceridemia also improved significantly in both patients after reduction/conversion. We conclude that SRL may facilitate the occurrence of lymphatic obstruction by mechanisms that are presently unexplained. Lymphedema of the limbs in renal transplant recipients under SRL treatment, especially if on the same side as the hemodialysis access, should warn the transplant physician to rapidly reduce or withdraw SRL before the occurrence of complete obstruction.

The argument for therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of cyclosporine (Cya) has been discussed for the last two decades. So far, a generalized consensus has been reached for TDM of Cya microemulsion in adult transplant recipients, being Cya blood levels obtained 2 hours after the administration (C2), the most reliable in reflecting the overall Cya exposure. However, clear guidelines are not available for the pediatric population because of the distinct metabolism of the drug in this patient population. Therefore, adult data do not necessarily apply to children. In this retrospective analysis, the authors sought to define a universal parameter for pharmacokinetic clinical monitoring of Cya in long-term kidney transplant recipients, regardless of their age. Lower C2 levels were observed in all patients, adult and pediatric, who eventually developed chronic allograft dysfunction (CRAD) compared with patients who maintained stable kidney function throughout the entire follow-up (pediatric CRAD, 933 +/- 455 ng/mL; vs Stable, 1236 +/- 347 ng/mL, P = .0001; and adult CRAD, 781 +/- 518 ng/mL; vs Stable, 1088 +/- 452 ng/mL, P = .009). On the other hand, the risk of Cya underexposure was not highlighted by trough level monitoring (C0) because all patients have been maintained steadily on therapeutical C0 levels for the entire follow-up. In conclusion, for Cya maintenance therapy, C2 appears to be a superior strategy to C0 monitoring in both adult and pediatric kidney transplant recipients.

Experimental and clinical evidence support the role of transforming growth factor beta-1 (TGF-beta(1)), a cytokine with complex immune and nonimmune effects, on the development of chronic renal allograft nephropathy (CAN). We investigated the effects of different immunosuppressive regimens on circulating TGF-beta(1) plasma levels in stable kidney transplant (KTx) recipients. Two hundred ninety-nine TGF-beta(1) plasma levels were measured in 125 kidney transplant (KTX) recipients exhibiting stable renal function, immunosuppressed with cyclosporine (CsA), tacrolimus (TAC), or sirolimus (SIR), and in 18 normal healthy volunteers (C). Activated immunoreactive TGF-beta(1) was detected in platelet-depleted plasma by an enzyme-linked immunoadsorbent assay. Multivariate analyses correlated immunosuppressive regimens with TGF-beta(1) levels. KTX recipients displayed significantly higher TGF-beta(1) levels compared to C (P =.0005). Patients receiving CsA had significantly higher TGF-beta(1) plasma levels compared to those receiving TAC or SIR (P =.0384). Multivariate analyses showed no correlation between TGF-beta(1) levels and immunosuppressive drug trough blood levels or doses, but only correlations with the main immunosuppressive drug. These data show that: (1) TGF-beta(1) production is activated in kidney transplant recipients; (2) CsA patients display significantly higher plasma TGF-beta(1) levels. Follow-up studies seek to assess the possible relationship with clinical events.

Posttransplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM) is a disturbing side effect of immunosuppression. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of different immunosuppressive agents on the development of PTDM in renal transplant recipients (KTx). The incidence of PTDM was evaluated in 538 consecutive KTx. Baseline immunosuppression was azathioprine (AZA), cyclosporine (CSA), or tacrolimus (TAC), or sirolimus in combination with calcineurin inhibitors (SIR). All patients received steroids for both induction and maintenance therapy during the first 6 months posttransplantation. Mean follow-up after KTx was 73 +/- 53.5 months (range 6 months to 16 years). PTDM was defined as two consecutive blood glucose determinations above 126 mg/dL. Thirty-six of 538 (6.7%) recipients experienced PTDM, 31 of whom required insulin treatment and five oral antidiabetic medications. PTDM occurred at 25.3 +/- 38 months posttransplantation in 4.8% of KTx treated with AZA, 4.8% of CSA, 6.5% of KTx treated with TAC and 12.5% of KTx treated with SIR. The time of onset of PTDM was significantly shorter (P =.003) among TAC (2.1 +/- 1.7 months posttransplantation) versus CSA (27.8 +/- 34 months). PTDM disappeared in 6 of 36 patients. We conclude that with current levels of immunosuppression, there is no difference in the incidence of PTDM between TAC- and CSA-treated KTx.

Background: The outcome of liver transplantation (LTx) has been correlated with several donor and recipient factors., Methods: A database of 191 consecutive LTx cases was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression statistics based on 80 variables. To avoid additional effects of late events on patient survival, the chosen endpoint was 6 months. Data were evaluated using SPSS statistical software., Results: Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed a difference in 1- to 6-month graft survival between patients transplanted with organs from donors older versus younger than 60 years (Breslow, P <.01). Differences in 1- to 6-month graft survivals were observed between patients listed as UNOS status 3, 2B, 2A, and 1: the outcomes for UNOS status 2B versus UNOS status 2A and UNOS status 2B versus status 1 were significant (P <.05). Differences in 1- to 6-month graft survival rates were found between patients with versus without sepsis (P <.05), and with versus without rejection episodes (P <.01). Cox regression analysis revealed only three of the variables to be independent prognostic predictors of graft failure: donor age; postoperative septic status; and rejection. The best mathematical multivariate Cox regression model linked donor age + donor Na + rejection + sepsis to 1- to 6-month graft survival (chi-square = 29.06, P <.001)., Conclusion: Factors predictive of 1- to 6-month graft survival after liver transplantation include donor age; UNOS status; sepsis; and rejection.

This observational study was undertaken in maintenance renal transplant recipients to assess the relationship between cyclosporine C(2) and the long-term risk of chronic renal allograft dysfunction (CRAD). Pharmacokinetic profiling was undertaken twice yearly in 79 patients with stable graft function receiving cyclosporine microemulsion (Neoral) and steroids. Mean time since transplantation at study entry was 56 +/- 49 months posttransplant. At the end of the observational period (mean 43 +/- 14 months) 24 patients (30%) had developed CRAD, defined as proteinuria > 500 mg/24 hours associated with a rising serum creatinine and confirmed by graft biopsy. There were no significant differences at baseline between patients who did vs did not develop CRAD, except for reduced incidence of acute rejection in CRAD-free patients. The cyclosporine AUC was significantly higher among patients without CRAD (5707 ng. h/mL vs 3994 ng. h/mL, P =.0007). Mean C(2) was also significantly higher: 1001 ng/mL in the CRAD-free group versus 640 ng/mL in the CRAD group (P =.002). There was no significant difference in C(0). Regression analysis showed that the best predictors for the occurrence of CRAD were a low AUC (relative risk [RR] 1.54, P <.0001), a low C(2) (RR 1.30, P <.0001) and proteinuria (RR 4.95, P <.0001). Probability of freedom from CRAD was 90% for C(2) > 900 ng/mL. C(2) appears to be a superior strategy to C(0) monitoring of cyclosporine in stable renal transplant patients with regard to the risk of CRAD. C(2) values above 900 ng/mL are appropriate to minimize the risk of CRAD among patients receiving cyclosporine microemulsion and steroids.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety of conversion to sirolimus (SRL) immunosuppression among 19 renal transplant recipients (KTX) with progressive chronic renal allograft dysfunction (CRAD). Conversion to SRL was performed with concomitant sharp withdrawal of the calcineurin inhibitor (CI). SRL was added at a starting dose of 3 mg, then adjusted to obtain SRL target trough blood levels of 8 to 10 ng/mL. CI were stopped the evening before starting SRL. All patients enrolled in the study have now completed 6 months of follow-up: all are alive without acute rejection or major infection following rapid conversion to SRL. No significant change in the 6 months postconversion hematologic and hepatic profile was observed compared with the preconversion values, while significant dyslipidemia was induced. After conversion to SRL, significant amelioration of the renal function was found in 36% of patients, stabilization in 21%, and continuous deterioration in 43%. Patients whose renal function improved were found to have been converted at a significantly lower creatinine: (pre 2.6 +/- 0.9 vs post 1.9 +/- 0.2; P =.038) with respect to those patients who had continuous renal deterioration. In KTX with CRAD, sharp withdrawal of CI with concomitant conversion to SRL is safe, avoiding major infections, acute rejections, and significant side effects. Short-term amelioration of the renal function is best obtained when early conversion is performed. Long-term follow-up will be necessary to confirm these preliminary data.