Search

Introduction: De novo autoimmune hepatitis, also known as plasma cell hepatitis, is an increasingly recognized entity following liver transplantation. The aim of this study is to investigate the long-term outcomes of patients with de novo autoimmune hepatitis., Methods: Using transplant liver biopsy database, we identified all patients showing plasma cell hepatitis following liver transplantation between 2008 and 2013. The diagnosis of plasma cell hepatitis was based on the histologic features from liver biopsies., Results: A total of 30 patients with plasma cell hepatitis were identified. Underling liver disease were hepatitis C virus (n = 11) and non-hepatitis C virus-related disease (n = 19). The interval period from liver transplantation to development of plasma cell hepatitis was 20 (2-246) months during 6 (1.5-25.8) years after liver transplantation. The mean international autoimmune hepatitis score and frequency of acute cellular rejection episode prior to the diagnosis of plasma cell hepatitis were lower in the patients with hepatitis C virus than those underlying non-hepatitis C virus-related disease. Twenty-seven patients (90.0%) showed complete biochemical response to plasma cell hepatitis treatment, but 10 (37.0%) patients relapsed. During the median 72 months' follow-up after liver transplantation, 9 (30.0%) patients progressed to cirrhosis (median 37 months) and 10 (33.3%) patients died or were retransplanted., Conclusions: This long-term clinical observation shows that de novo autoimmune hepatitis represents one cause of graft loss in patients with or without hepatitis C virus. Although most patients exhibit a good response to medical therapy, de novo autoimmune hepatitis is likely to recur and progress to liver cirrhosis., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The aim of this study was to assess the effect of low-dose adenosine on hepatic artery flow (HAF) when administered intraoperatively by continuous infusion., Materials and Methods: Between January 2009 and August 2009, 74 patients underwent orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). Ten patients were enrolled for adenosine treatment, and 64 non-study patients served as controls. After arterial reperfusion, a 16-G central venous catheter was placed in the gastroduodenal artery, and adenosine was continuously infused at doses ranging from 0.7 to 2.8 μg/kg/min for 30 min. HAF and portal vein flow were measured using a transit time flow meter before adenosine infusion, during infusion, and 10 min after infusion. Liver function tests were monitored routinely, duplex ultrasonography was performed on postoperative day 1, and the hepatic artery resistive index measured. The patients were followed for 1 year., Results: Adenosine significantly increased HAF at doses from 0.7 to 2.8 μg/kg/min. The smallest increase in HAF was 24% above the baseline; in 80% of patients, the increase in HAF was >50% of the baseline values. In 2 patients, HAF was increased by >300%. The dosing started at 0.7 μg/kg/min, and 6 of 10 patients responded. Three patients required an increase to 1.4 μg/kg/min. Doses >2.8 μg/kg/min did not further increase HAF. One patient showed a minimal response regardless of the dose. There were no differences between the adenosine group and control group with respect to liver function (aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, total bilirubin, and International Normalized Ratio), platelet count on POD2, hepatic artery resistive index, and post-transplant length of stay, intensive care days, or 1-year patient survival rates., Conclusions: This pilot study established that adenosine administered directly into the hepatic artery produces a similar effect on HAF in cadaveric liver transplant recipients to that found in the laboratory without producing systemic side effects., (Copyright © 2016. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: Higher rates of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) recurrence after liver transplantation (LT) in patients with chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection have been reported. This can influence their selection for LT and post-LT monitoring., Objective: The aim of this work was to compare the rates of post-LT HCC recurrence and survival in HBV and non-HBV patients with the use of the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) database., Methods: After accessing the UNOS database, we analyzed patients with HCC stage T2 who underwent LT from cadaveric donors on or after August 24, 1998. Propensity score matching based on age, Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD), and donor risk index was used to match HBV-HCC patients to HCC patients with other underlying liver diseases: hepatitis C virus (HCV), alcoholic liver disease (ALD), both HCV + ALD, and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). Kaplan-Meier plots and multivariable analysis (with the use of propensity score, age, sex, and race) were used to assess post-LT HCC recurrence and overall survival., Results: A total of 4,480 HCC patients were matched. Their average age was 57 ± 7.8 years and average calculated MELD score was 13. Within 5 years of LT, 5.5% of patients had HCC recurrence and 20% died. HBV-HCC patients had 1.9 and 1.8 times higher hazard of tumor recurrence compared with ALD and NASH patients, respectively, and a 32% lower hazard of death than patients with HCV + ALD. There was no evidence of any other significant difference in HCC recurrence or survival among the etiology groups., Conclusions: HCC recurrence and survival rates following LT for HCC patients with chronic HBV infection are similar to those of HCC patients with other underlying liver diseases. These findings support LT as a viable option for HCC-HBV patients., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Tacrolimus has been increasingly used for liver transplantation during the last decade. The drug has immunological advantages in short- to medium-term follow-up. However, data on longitudinal follow-up are lacking., Aim: The aim of the present report was to examine the impact of tacrolimus in primary adult and pediatric liver transplantation (LTx) patients., Material and Method: One thousand consecutive primary LTx patients were performed under tacrolimus between August 1989 and December 1992 were followed up until August 2004. Mean follow-up was 13.4 +/- 0.92 (range, 11.7-15) years. There were 600 males and 400 females with a mean age of 42.6 +/- 20.2 years. There were 166 children (age 18 years or younger) and 834 adults, of whom 204 were older than 60 years (seniors)., Results: Four hundred ninety-seven (49.7%) patients died in the follow-up period. The overall 15-year actuarial patient survival rate was 51.4%. The survival rate for children was significantly better (81.3%) compared with adults (47.5%) and seniors (36.4%) (P = .0001). One hundred fifty-one patients received a second LTx, 22 patients received a third LTx, and 4 patients received a fourth LTx. Over all 15 years the actuarial graft survival rate was 46.1%. At last follow-up, 69.1% of patients were off steroids. The majority of late deaths were due to age-related complications, recurrence of disease, and De novo cancers., Conclusion: The data on longitudinal follow-up have shown actuarial survival for children to be significantly better than in adults and seniors. Graft loss from immunological causes are rare even with long-term follow-up.

Background: Increasing donor hospital cooperation with donation after cardiac death (DCD) requires the organ procurement organization (OPO) to use current withdrawal of life support (WLS) protocols. Hospital ICU nurses/physicians are comfortable performing the emotionally draining procedure of WLS in the ICU while OPOs are reluctant to accept these donors due to increased warm ischemia (WI). In our area, several hospitals will only allow WLS to occur in the ICU. This study compares liver outcomes from DCD donors where death occurred in the ICU (DCDICU) vs the OR (DCDOR)., Methods: From March 2003 to June 2004, 34 DCD donors were recovered by our OPO. WLS occurred in the ICU for 26 donors (76%) and in the OR for 8 donors (24%). Thirteen of 26 DCDICU and 5 of 8 DCDOR livers were transplanted. Donor demographics, warm ischemic time, cold ischemic time, distance shipped, and recipient functions were analyzed., Results: Eighteen livers were transplanted both locally and at distant transplant centers. Results are outlined in the ., Conclusions: Although DCDICU donors averaged approximately 4 minutes longer WI than DCDOR donors, short-term results for both groups were equivalent. These findings support using DCDICU livers. DCDICU donors have the potential to significantly improve donor hospital cooperation.