Search

Background Context: Studies have demonstrated sustained improvements in patient-reported outcomes (PROs) after three-column osteotomies (three-COs), but no study has evaluated what factors impact long-term outcomes., Purpose: The aim was to investigate factors associated with PROs in patients who underwent three-CO at minimum 5 years postoperatively., Study Design/sample: This was a retrospective review of prospective database., Patient Sample: All patients who had a three-CO at a single institution and completed clinical evaluations after at least 5 years postoperative were included., Outcome Measures: Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Scoliosis Research Society (SRS) scores, and radiographic parameters were assessed at baseline and a minimum 5 years postoperatively., Methods: Analysis of 120 patients who underwent three-CO (96-pedicle subtraction osteotomy/24-vertebral column resection) was performed. The mean age was 48 years (range 8-79), and clinical follow-up was 7 years (range 5-14). Separate multivariable linear regression analyses were performed to determine factors associated with ODI, SRS average, and SRS satisfaction while controlling for time since surgery and baseline outcome scores., Results: Average PROs were significantly improved from baseline at a minimum 5-year follow-up (ODI: 48-28, p<.01; SRS: 2.8-3.5, p<.01). The average SRS satisfaction score was 4.0. Average sagittal alignment (C7 plumb) improved 74 mm, with 81% of patients' alignment less than 95 mm. Major surgical complications occurred in 32 patients (27%) with major reoperations in 30 patients (25%). Multivariable regression analysis found that prior surgery and major reoperations were risk factors for worse ODI scores. A diagnosis of adult idiopathic scoliosis and final sagittal alignment less than 95 mm were associated with improved SRS scores. Improvement in major coronal Cobb and final pelvic tilt less than 30° were associated with increased SRS satisfaction., Conclusions: With a minimum 5-year follow-up, PROs in patients undergoing three-CO were associated with improvements in radiographic alignment but negatively affected by prior surgery and complications necessitating revision surgery., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background Context: Postoperative spine infections have been reported to occur in 1% to 15% of patients and subsequently lead to significant morbidity and cost, with an elevated risk for instrumented cases. Every effort should be made to minimize the risk of intraoperative wound contamination. Consequently, certain practices are followed in the operating room to prevent contamination, many of which are not evidence based. Conversely, certain objects believed to be sterile are frequently overlooked as potential sources of contamination., Purpose: To assess to what degree contamination of spinal implants occurs during spine surgery and evaluate whether coverage of implants alters the rate of contamination., Study Design: Prospective study., Study Sample: This study included 105 consecutive noninfection surgical cases performed by a single spine surgeon that required the use of instrumentation., Outcome Measure: Spinal implant contamination., Methods: Cases were randomized to have all implant trays either remain uncovered (n=54) or covered (n=51) with sterile surgical towels on opening until implants were required for the case. After the last implant was placed, a sterile culture swab was used to obtain a sample from all open implants that had been present at the start of the case. The paper outer wraps of the implant trays were sampled in each case as a positive control, and an additional 105 swabs were capped immediately after they were opened to obtain negative controls. Swab samples were assessed for bacterial growth on 5% sheep blood Columbia agar plates. Of note, only departmental funding was used and no applicable financial relationships exist with any author., Results: No growth was observed on any of the 105 negative controls, whereas 99.1% of positive controls demonstrated obvious contamination. Cultures from implant samples demonstrated a 9.5% overall rate of contamination with 2.0% (n=1) of covered implants versus 16.7% (n=9) of uncovered implants demonstrating contamination. Length of time implant trays were open before sample collection; implant type (plate, rods, vs. polyetheretherketone), number of scrubbed personnel, and number of implants used were all not found to be significantly associated with implant contamination (p>.05). However, coverage of implants was found to significantly reduce the implant contamination rate (p=.016)., Conclusions: The contamination of sterile implants during spine surgery was found to occur. However, this contamination was independent of the amount of time the implant trays remained open. Coverage of implants significantly reduces this contamination. Therefore, no matter the expected duration of a case, implant coverage is a simple modifiable way to reduce the risk of intraoperative wound contamination and potentially reduce postoperative infections., (Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background Context: Despite improvements through the use of prophylactic systemic antibiotics, surgical site infections remain a significant problem in the treatment of traumatic spine injuries. Infection rates as high as 10% have been reported in this population. The impact on patients and cost of treating such infections is profound. Local delivery of antibiotics has been found to be efficacious in animal and human studies as an adjunct to systemic antibiotics in surgical site infection prophylaxis., Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy of using vancomycin powder in surgical sites to prevent infections., Study Design: Retrospective case review., Patient Sample: Patients who underwent posterior spine fusions for traumatic injuries over a 2-year period at a single academic center., Outcome Measures: Clinical outcome determined was the incidence of either superficial or deep postoperative wound infections., Methods: A retrospective review of 110 patients with traumatic spine injuries treated with instrumented posterior spine fusions over a 2-year period at a single academic center was performed. One group (control group) received standard systemic prophylaxis only, whereas another (treatment group) received vancomycin powder in the surgical wound in addition to systemic prophylaxis. Patient demographics and perioperative information obtained included history of previous spine surgeries, substance use, diabetes, body mass index, level of injury, presence of neurologic deficit, operative time, and estimated blood loss. Incidence of infection was the primary outcome evaluated., Results: The control (N=54) and treatment groups (N=56) were statistically similar. A statistically significant difference in infection rate was found between the treatment group (0%) and control group (13%, p=.02) without any adverse events. No adverse effects were noted from use of the vancomycin powder., Conclusions: The use of vancomycin powder in surgical wounds may significantly reduce the incidence of infection in patients with traumatic spine injuries treated with instrumented posterior spine fusion. Applying vancomycin powder to surgical wounds is a promising means of preventing costly and harmful postoperative wound infections in high-risk populations., (Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)