Search

This multicenter, randomized, prospective, controlled trial (EVIDENCE study) aimed to determine short-term effects of early steroid withdrawal in renal transplant patients initially treated with everolimus, low-dose cyclosporine (CsA), and steroids. Patients were randomized to standard triple therapy with CsA, everolimus twice daily and steroids (group A), steroid-free immunosuppression (group B), or triple therapy once daily (group C). However, since patient enrollment was slower than expected, group C randomization was prematurely discontinued. The primary end point was treatment failure rate (composite end point of death, graft loss, biopsy-proven acute rejection, and loss to follow-up) between randomization and month 12. Patients evaluable for the primary end point included 139 randomized patients. According to intention-to-treat analysis, 2.8% of patients in group A and 14.7% in group B experienced treatment failure (95% upper confidence limit 19.7%). As this was higher than the predefined noninferiority limit of 10%, noninferiority could not be proved. No conclusive statements can be made on noninferiority of the steroid withdrawal regimen vs the standard regimen in these patients. Additional studies with longer follow-up are required to determine the efficacy of steroid-free immunosuppression in renal transplant recipients receiving everolimus., (Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Most of the difficulties when trying to realize the proposal to prescribe physical activity for transplantation patients come from patient attitudes and cultural beliefs that ignore the benefits of exercise, but there also are organizational aspects arising from the difficulties that these patients face in accessing supervised exercise facilities. To address these difficulties, the Italian study project "Transplant … and Now Sport" was developed based on a model of cooperation among transplantation specialists, sports physicians, and exercise specialists organized as a team combining their specific skills to effectively actuate the physical exercise programs. This preliminary report is based on 26 patients (16 male, 10 female; 47.8±10.0 years old; 21 kidney and 5 liver transplantations; time from transplantation 2.3±1.4 years) who performed prescribed and supervised exercises consisting of 3 sessions per week of aerobic and strengthening exercises for 1 year. Preliminary results show a significant decrease in body mass index (t=1.966; P<.05) and a significant increase in peak aerobic power (t=4.535; P<.01) and maximum workload (t=4.665; P<.01) on the incremental cycling test. Also maximum strength of knee extensors (t=2.933; P<.05) and elbow flexors (t=2.450; P<.05) and countermovement jump performance (t=2.303; P<.05) significantly increased. Creatinine and proteinuria tended to decrease, but the differences were not significant. In health-related quality of life assessed by the SF-36 questionnaire, the Bodily Pain, General Health, Vitality, Social Functioning, and Role Emotional scale scores showed a significant improvement (P<.05). Preliminary results of the study protocol "Transplant…and Now Sport" show the positive effects of the model based on cooperation among transplantation centers, sports medicine centers, and gyms in the administration of a supervised exercise prescription. These data should be considered a contribution to developing and promoting further detailed exercise protocols and to fostering improved posttransplantation health and survival, helping to ensure that physical activity becomes a safe routine medical treatment plan of patient management., (Copyright © 2014. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: Kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) manifest hypercoagulable state that contributes to an increased incidence of deep vein thrombosis (DVT), not only early but also late in their course. KTRs display an imbalance of hemostatic mechanisms with a multifactorial rise in procoagulant factors, partly related to traditional risk factors and partly to transplantation. The aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence of first episodes of DVT among KTRs, focusing on risk factors., Methods: From 2008 to 2011, we evaluated 30 kidney transplant patients who ≥4 months there after transplantation developed DVT in the lower limbs only, lower limbs complicated by pulmonary embolism or retinal thrombosis. We analyzed causes of primary nephropathy, immunosuppressive regimen, post-transplantation infections, and erythrocytosis. DVT was diagnosed by color Doppler ultrasound or eye examination., Results: A significantly increased incidence of DVT was observed among patients receiving cyclosporine or cyclosporine + mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors, affected by polycystic kidney diseases, systemic lupus erythematosus or nephrotic syndrome, or displaying rapid and/or excessive correction of hematocrit values. DVT was not significantly related to an acute infection (cytomegalovirus) or to the prior dialysis modality., Conclusions: Hypercoagulability is a multifactorial condition in KTRs, representing a severe complication in stable patients. Prevention may consist of either accurate pretransplantation screening for thrombophilia or identification of patients at higher DVT risk., (Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

We analyzed the results of kidney transplantation in autosomal dominent polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) patients in Italy, including 14,305 transplantations performed from January 2002 to December 2010, including: 12,859 first single or double kidneys from cadaveric donors (13% polycystic), 172 combined liver-kidney cases (22% polycystic), and 1,303 living-donor organs (7% polycystic). Among the first transplantations (12,008 single, 851 double), with follow-ups ranging from 16 to 120 months, polycystic patients demonstrated better graft survival compared with other kidney diseases (86% vs 82% at 5 years; P < .01); mortality was not different (92% vs 79% at 1 year). A better trend was obtained also among combined liver-kidney transplantations in ADPKD. Regarding pretransplantation management of polycystic patients, we noticed a conservative attitude in 32/35 transplant centers. The main indication for nephrectomy was for the lack of abdominal space. Regarding instrumental studies, 86% of centers asked for second-level investigations computerized tomography for kidney dimensions. Radiologic investigations for vasculocerebral malformations were required in 97% of the centers: 74% as a routine and 23% in the presence of familial history of cerebral hemorrhage. Polycystic patients are good candidates for kidney transplantation with correct management before transplantation., (Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Combined liver-kidney transplantation (LKT) is considered to be a safe procedure, but the appropriate immunosuppressive regimen is unclear., Patients and Methods: Between January 1997 and October 2011, 55 patients were listed for LKT: 45 (82%) were effectively transplanted, 5 (9.2%) died whereon here the waiting list, 3 (5.5%) temporarily out of waiting list, 1 (1.8%) was on waiting list and 1 (1.8%) refused LKT. Five LKTs treated with cyclosporine (CyA) were excluded from the analysis. Mean recipient age was 50.32 ± 10.32 years (14-65), MELD score at time of LKT was 19.22 ± 4.69 (8-29), mean waiting list time was 8.14 ± 9.50 months (0.1-35.76), and follow-up, 4.09 ± 3.02 years (0.01-10.41). Main indications for LKT were policystic disease (n = 15; 37%), hepatitis virus C (HCV)-related cirrhosis (n = 9; 22%) metabolic disease (n = 5; 13%), hepatitis virus B (HBV) cirrhosis (n = 4; 10%), alcoholic cirrhosis (n = 4; 10%), and cholestatic disease (n = 3; 8%). Immunosuppressive regimen was based on tacrolimus and steroids in 40 cases with induction therapy with alemtuzumab (Campath; 0.3 mg/kg) in 13 of 40 instances cases administered on day 0 and day 7., Results: Postoperative mortality was 2.5%. Acute cellular rejection episodes were biopsy-proven in 2 (5%) cases, post-LKT infections developed in 17 cases (42.5%), and de novo cancer developed in 3 (7.5%) cases. Similar 5-year overall survivals were obtained irrespective of the LKT indication: 100% in cholestatic and alcoholic cirrhosis patients, 86% in policystic disease, 75% in metabolic disease and HBV patients, and 66% in HCV cirrhosis. Overall survivals for the alemtuzumab vs without-induction therapy groups at 1, 3, and 5-years were 100%, 85.7%, and 85.7% vs 76%, 76%, and 70%, respectively (P = .04)., Conclusion: An immunosuppressive regimen based on tacrolimus and steroids with induction therapy with alemtuzumab was safe, with excellent long-term results for combined LKT., (Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: The use of kidneys from expanded criteria donors (ECD) is an attractive strategy to enlarge the pool of organs available for transplantation. Considering the fact that ECD organs have a reduced nephron mass, they are preferentially allocated for dual-kidney transplantation (DKT). Authors have reported excellent results of DKT when pretransplant ECD organs are evaluated for histological scores. The aim of this study was to evaluate DKT donor and recipient characteristics for comparison with DKT posttransplant outcomes versus those of recipients of single-kidney transplantations from expanded criteria (edSKT) and ideal donors (idSKT). We analyzed the potential prognostic factors involved in DKT among a population derived from three transplant centers., Materials and Methods: Between 2001 and 2007, DKT (n = 80) were performed based upon the ECD kidney allocation assessed by biopsy., Results: The average donor ages for the DKT, edSKT, and idSKT groups were 68.8 ± 7.8, 65.3 ± 7.2, and 40.1 ± 13.8 years, respectively (P < .001). The number of human leukocyte antigen mismatches was greater in the DKT group (3.1 ± 1.2, P < .05). Patient and graft 5-year survival rates were similar among DKT, edSKT, and idSKT recipients, namely, 97.5% versus 95.8% versus 96.9% and 93.7% versus 87.4% versus 86.9%, respectively. Mean serum creatinine values at discharge were lower in the DKT and idSKT recipients (1.5 ± 0.9 and 1.6 ± 0.7 mg/dL; P < .05) compared with the edSKT group (1.9 ± 0.7 mg/dL). Correlations between supposed prognostic factors and survival among the DKT group noted worse outcomes in reoperation cases (P < .05)., Conclusion: We confirmed that DKT produced successful outcomes. An accurate surgical procedure is particularly important to try to avoid reoperations. In our experience, the use of a biopsy as an absolute criterion to allocate ECD kidneys may be too protective., (Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: It is widely accepted that the risk of malignancies is significantly increased among patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) and after kidney transplantation compared with the general population. Only a few data are available on kidney transplantation waiting list patients. The aim of this study was to investigate solid organ cancer incidence among subjects on the waiting list at a single center., Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the records of all patients enrolled on our kidney transplantation waiting list between August 1, 2008 and July 31, 2010, seeking to evaluate the causes of withdrawal from the list, incidence of cancer, type of neoplasm, and its correlation with clinical features. We estimated the ratio of observed to expected numbers of cancers, the standardized incidence ratio (SIR)., Results: Among 1184 patients, we excluded 569 patients from the waiting list including 26 (4.56%) who displayed malignancies. The overall incidence of cancer was 0.11 events/person-months and the overall prevalence of cancer was 2.2%. In 97% of patients, the malignant disease was confined to the primitive organ of origin without secondary dissemination. We observed a prevalence of cancers related to ESKD (17; 65.38%). The SIR for all cancer types in our population compared with the general population was 2.22. The SIR for native kidney and thyroid cancers among our population compared with the general population was >10., Conclusion: The incidence of cancer was significantly increased among kidney transplantation waiting list patients compared with the general population. Our study highlighted the importance of a careful, targeted neoplastic screening. It could be particularly important for ESKD-related malignancies like native kidney tumors or thyroid cancers., (Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Delayed graft function (DGF) is a common complication in kidney transplantation. We sought to evaluate possible correlates for DGF including intraoperative parameters, focusing on fluid replacement and central venous pressure (CVP) values among patients undergoing kidney transplantation at our center., Methods: One hundred fifty-five cadaveric donor transplantations performed at our center between 2001 and 2005 were selected for the study. We compared intraoperative parameters together with 15 other clinical and socio-demographic recipient and donor variables among patients experiencing DGF (n = 58) versus those with immediate graft function (IGF; n = 97). All significant variables at P < .05 upon univariate analysis were entered into a multivariate logistic regression model to identify risk factors for DGF., Results: CVP at awakening of ≤8 mm Hg (odds ratio [OR] = 3.53; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.63-7.63), fluid input during surgery ≤2.250 mL (OR = 2.12; 95% CI, 1.00-4.51), and recipient age ≥50 years (OR = 2.72; 95% CI, 1.11-6.68) were the strongest correlates of DGF., Conclusions: Our data suggested that reduced intraoperative perfusion as measured using CVP monitoring might increase DGF risk. This study provides the rationale to further investigate the optimal CVP target during this surgery., (Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Limited information has been published about sporting activities in solid organ transplant recipients. The aim of this study was to assess "in the field" performance capacities of a group of transplant recipients involved in an alpine skiing competition. We studied 16 transplant recipients (13 men and 3 women) who had undergone transplantations (11 kidney, 4 liver, and 1 heart) at 89 +/- 68 months prior while participating in an alpine skiing race. The patients performed a countermovement jumping test to measure the explosive power of the lower limbs. In all patients blood lactate concentrations (La) were measured at the end of a giant slalom race. The maximum displacement of the center of mass during the jumping test was 22.4 +/- 9.3 cm; the time to complete the giant slalom was 75.5 +/- 16.5 seconds and La was 3.5 +/- 0.8 mmol/L. We observed significant linear relationships between race time and La (R(2) = 0.4733; P < .01) and between race time and performance in the jumping test (R(2) = 0.3655; P < .05). This study indicated that recovery of anaerobic and technical sporting activities is possible in organ transplant recipients. Muscular power and anaerobic performances among a selected group of solid organ transplant recipients were similar to those of the general untrained population., (Copyright (c) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Kidney transplantations combined with other solid organs are progressively increasing in number. There are no guidelines regarding the nephrologic indications for combined transplantations, namely liver-kidney (LKT), or heart-kidney (HKT), in preemptive patients with chronic kidney failure who are not on regular dialysis therapy. The objective of this study was to assess the functional contribution of the native kidneys after preemptive kidney transplantation combined with other solid organs. From 2004, 9 patients (aged 50.3 +/- 8.5 years) with chronic kidney failure (creatinine 2.5 +/- 1.0 mg/dL) caused by polycystic kidney disease (n = 4), vascular nephropathy (n = 2), interstitial nephropathy (n = 1), glomerulonephritis (n = 1), or end-stage kidney disease (n = 1), underwent combined transplantations (8 LKT, 1 HKT). A scintigraphic functional study (Tc-99DMSA or Tc-99mMAG3), was performed at 4 +/- 3 months after transplantation to evaluate the functional contribution of both the native kidneys and the graft. All patients were given immunosuppressive drugs, including a calcineurin inhibitor (tacrolimus/or cyclosporine). At the time of scintigraphy, renal function in all patients was 1.3 +/- 0.3 mg/dL. The functional contribution of the transplanted kidneys was on average 77 +/- 18%. Only in 1 patient was the contribution of the graft <50%. At follow-up after 36 months, patient and kidney survivals were 100%. The study confirmed a high risk of loss of native kidney function in the presence of organic nephropathy. In light of our experience, a creatinine clearance <30 mL/min in an appropriate cutoff for a combined transplantation. Close clinical and instrumental assessment pretransplant is essential before proceeding with a combined transplant program to exclude functional forms and to optimize the use of organs., (Copyright (c) 2010. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: Few studies have measured cadaveric kidney weight to investigate its relation to recipient kidney function related to it. The aim of this study was to evaluate kidney weight (cadaveric donor) and its relationship to creatinine clearance (CrCl) after 12 months posttransplantation., Methods: We evaluated 81 renal transplantation recipients from cadaveric donors. We collected donor and recipient demographic, clinical and anthropometric data. Data about kidney weight were obtained through kidney measurement using an electronic machine at the moment of transplantation., Results: The mean kidney weight was 201.4 +/- 10.2 g (200.5 +/- 11.6 g in women and 210.3 +/- 14.1 g in men). Kidney weight correlated with CrCl at 12 months (0.001). The CrCl at 12 months showed a significant correlation of graft weight/recipient weight ratio (P < .01)., Conclusion: The cadaveric donor kidney weight significantly influenced the CrCl at 12 months after transplantation., (Copyright (c) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Immunological evaluation by panel-reactive antibody (PRA) and determination of anti-HLA specificity are important phases in the evaluation of patients awaiting kidney transplantation. The main causes of immunization are previous solid organ transplantation, hemotransfusion, and pregnancy. It is also possible that immunogenicity can be triggered by vascularized tissue grafts. Immune induction by cryopreserved bone prostheses is not yet understood. A 19-year-old patient with osteosarcoma had undergone resection of the left proximal tibia with reconstruction using human bone in 1997. The donor HLA typing was as follows: A3, A29 (19); B44 (12), Bw4; DR13 (6), DR7, DR52, DR53. The patient was subsequently enrolled onto the waiting list for cadaveric donor kidney transplantation due to chronic kidney failure caused by cisplatin toxicity. Pretransplantation immunological screening using the complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) technique revealed a PRA of 63%. IgG antibody specificities were detected against class I and class II donor antigens, specifically anti-A3, B44, DR7 antibodies, using flow cytometry (Tepnel Luminex). Further immunological studies using single HLA specificity analysis (LSA Class I degrees -II degrees , Tepnel-Luminex) showed direct antibodies against all donor antigen specificities. This case showed immune induction after the implantation of bone prosthesis in a kidney transplant candidate, underlining the importance of the availability of HLA typing data of donors of a human prosthesis.

Background: Marginal organs not suitable for single kidney transplantation are considered for double kidney transplantation (DKT). Herein we have reviewed short and long-term outcomes of DKT over a 7-year experience., Patients and Methods: Between 2001 and 2007, 80 DKT were performed in the transplant centers of Bologna, Parma, and Modena, Italy. Recipient mean age was 61+/-5 years. The main indications were glomerular nephropathy (n=33) and hypertensive nephroangiosclerosis (n=14). Mean HLA A, B, and DR mismatches were 3.1+/-1.2. Donor mean age was 69+/-8 years and mean creatinine clearance was 75+/-27 mL/min. Almost all kidneys were perfused with Celsior solution. Mean cold ischemia time was 17+/-4 hours and mean warm ischemia time was 41+/-17 minutes. Mean biopsy score was 4.4. Immunosuppression was based on tacrolimus (n=52) or cyclosporine (n=26)., Results: Fifty (62.5%) patients displayed good postoperative renal function. Thirty (37.5%) experienced acute tubular necrosis and required postoperative dialysis treatment; 8 acute rejections occurred. Urinary complications were 13.7% with 8/11 requiring surgical revision. There were 6 surgical reexplorations: intestinal perforation (n=2), bleeding (n=3), and lymphocele (n=1). Two patients lost both grafts due to vascular and infectious complications at 7 or 58 days after transplantation. Two patients underwent intraoperative transplantectomy due to massive vascular thrombosis. Four (5%) patients underwent transplantectomy of a single graft due to vascular complications (n=2), bleeding (n=1), or infectious complications (n=1). Graft and patient survivals were 95% and 100% versus 93% and 97% at 3 versus 36 months, respectively., Conclusions: DKT is a safe approach for organ shortage. The score used in this study is useful to determine whether a kidney should be refused or accepted.

Background: We retrospectively reviewed our experience in combined liver-kidney (L-KT) and heart-kidney (H-KT) transplantations., Patients and Methods: Between January 1997 and April 2007, we performed 25 L-KT and 5 H-KT. Patient mean age was 51+/-8 years in L-KT and 43+/-11 years in H-KT. The main cause of liver failure was chronic viral hepatitis (14 cases). Etiology of heart failure was dilated cardiomyopathy and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (4 and 1 patients, respectively). The main causes of renal failure in L-KT were chronic glomerulonephritis (n=8) and polycystic disease (n=7). Etiology of renal failure in H-KT was interstitial nephropathy (n=2), vascular nephropathy (n=2), and chronic glomerulonephritis (n=1)., Results: Mean follow-up was 32+/-26 months in L-KT and 24+/-17 months in H-KT. Immunosuppression was cyclosporine-based (n=4) or tacrolimus-based (n=21) in L-KT and cyclosporine-based in H-KT. Acute rejection rate was 8% for both liver and kidney in L-KT; 80% (mild) for heart and 40% for kidney in H-KT. In the L-KT group, there was no primary graft nonfunction (PGNF). Two patients experienced liver delayed graft function (DGF); 1 patient required postoperative dialysis. One-year graft and patient survivals were both 84% and overall graft and patient survival was 76%. In the H-KT group, 3 patients needed postoperative dialysis and 1 required a cardiac assistance device for 48 hours; overall graft and patient survival was 100% with good cardiac and renal functions., Conclusion: Our experience confirmed that H-KT and L-KT are safe procedures, offering good long-term results.

On all kidney waiting lists the 10% to 20% of patients who have antibodies against more than 80% of a panel of HLA antigens (panel reactive antibody [PRA] >80%) are difficult to transplant. The best solution for these patients is to find a compatible donor, ideally a full match, who yields a negative crossmatch test (CMX). If this is not possible, desensitization treatment (high-dose) intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) or plasmapheresis (PP) + low-dose IVIG is possible with good results in living donor kidney transplantation mainly if the antibody titer is low. It may also be offered to patients awaiting cadaveric donors too after a long waiting time; however, when applied for several months, it has the obvious disadvantage of giving the patient the risk for long-lasting immunologic weakness without the certitude of finding a kidney. In one of our recent cases of combined liver plus kidney transplantation, a positive CMX became negative 8 hours after the liver operation; the kidney was transplanted with a good result which lasted over 3 years. This observation suggested the possibility of a quick desensitization protocol in selected patients with a large (but not strong) immunization who probably are the majority. Patients sensitized to IVIG and with low titer PRA could be given a single PP + low-dose IVIG (what can be done within the time limit of cadaveric donor kidney transplantation) with good probability of turning an initial positive CMX to negative with the possibility of performing the operation and the advantage of giving the immunosuppression only when the kidney is present.

Introduction: In our clinical context, there are two groups that practice blood purification treatments on acute or chronic liver failure (AoCLF) patients: one group used MARS (molecular adsorbent recirculating system) and the other Prometheus., Materials and Methods: The MARS group used the lack of response to standard medical treatment after 72 hours of observation as the access criterion. The Prometheus group used the access criteria of the multicenter Helios protocol for patients in AoCLF, as well as those with primary nonfunction (PNF) and secondary liver insufficiency. Both groups performed treatment sessions of at least 6 hours, which were repeated at least every 24 to 36 hours., Results: The 56 treated AoCLF patients underwent 278 treatment sessions; 41 out of 191 procedures with MARS and 16 out of 87 procedures with prometheus, which was also applied in two cases in PNF and four in secondary liver insufficiency. The results showed that both systems accomplished a good purification efficiency and that application to patients enabled reinstatement on the transplant list and grafts in 70% of the cases with either method., Conclusion: Treatment led to recovery in dysfunction among patients not destined for transplantation, achieved with a 48.5% 3-month survival in the MARS group and 33.5% in the Prometheus groups. The treatment results were inversely proportional to the MELD at the time of entry; The treatment appeared to be pointless. Among PNF and secondary liver insufficiency cases.

Introduction: Double-kidney transplantation is performed using organs from marginal donors with a histological score not suitable for single kidney transplantation. The aim of this study was to verify the results obtained with double-kidney transplantation in terms of graft/patient survivals and complications., Patients and Methods: Between September 2001 and September 2006. 26 double-kidney transplantations were performed in our center. Indications for surgery were: chronic glomerulonephritis (n = 17), polycystic disease (n = 4), reflux nephropathy (n = 1), hypertensive nephroangiosclerosis (n = 4). The kidneys were all perfused with Celsior solution and mean cold ischemia time was 16.7 +/- 2.5 hours. In all cases, a pretransplant kidney biopsy was performed to evaluate the damage (mean score: 4.3). Immunosuppression was tacrolimus-based for all patients., Results: Eighteen patients had good renal postoperative function, while the other eight displayed acute tubular necrosis. Two of the patients who had severe acute tubular necrosis never recovered renal function. There was only one episode of acute rejection, while the incidence of urinary complications was 31%. There were two surgical reoperations for intestinal perforation. Graft and recipient survivals were 82.7% and 100%, and 78.9% and 94% at 3 and 36 months, respectively., Conclusions: Double-kidney transplantation is a safe strategy to face the organ shortage. The score used in this study is useful to determine whether a kidney should be refused or suitable for single- or dual-kidney transplantation. The results of our experience are encouraging, but the series is too small to allow a conclusion.

Background: Metabolic syndrome (MS) includes some risk factors for development of diabetes and cardiovascular disease, obesity (BMI > 30), high triglycerides, low HDL cholesterol, hypertension and impaired glucose tolerance. Following the definition of the Adult Treatment Panel III criteria, a diagnosis of MS was established when 3 or more factors were present. In renal transplant patients MS has been reported to negatively influence both patient and graft survivals. The present study sought to verify the effect of MS among our cases., Methods: 298 cadaveric renal transplant recipients operated between January 1, 1996 and December 31, 2001 with absence of diabetes before transplantation, stable renal function 1 year posttransplantation and at least 4 years follow up were retrospectively evaluated from the end of the first post-operative year., Results: 50 patients out of 298 (16,7%) had MS at the beginning of the study, including 37 of them with 3 and 13 with 4 risk factors. Only one patient with MS died of cardiovascular disease. Graft failure was observed in 23.5% MS patients versus 9,7% patients without the Syndrome (p:n.s.) Only Creatinine and the incidence of Cardiovascular Diseases at 4 years were statistically higher in MS patients (P < .001)., Conclusions: These results suggested that MS is a risk factor for increasing CVD morbidity and decreased graft function, but early treatment of risk factors as soon as they become apparent can limit the adverse effects on patient and graft survival.

In isolated liver transplantation pretransplant renal failure is a major mortality risk, there are no guidelines at the moment to establish the indications for a combined liver-kidney transplantation (LKT). In irreversible chronic renal failure (CRF) not on dialysis, nephrological evaluation is required to assess the need for a simultaneous kidney transplantation. There are no experiences about the functional contribution of native kidneys post-LKT. Herein we have reported the case of two patients who underwent LKT in 2004 due to CRF, not yet on dialysis. At the moment of LKT, the first patient (polycystic kidney disease) had a glomerular filtration rate (GFR) = 29 mL/min, and the second recipient (vascular nephropathy and diabetes), a GFR = 33 mL/min. In both cases we did not observe delayed graft function. At discharge the serum creatinine was 1.1 and 1.0 mg/dL, respectively, which was maintained during follow-up. In both cases renal scintigraphy with Tc-99 DMSA was performed to evaluate the functional contributions of transplanted versus native kidneys. In the first case scintigraphy at 9 months after LKT demonstrated an 81% contribution from the transplanted kidney, 9% from the right and 10% from the left native kidneys. In the second case, at 3 months after LKT, the functional contributions were 76%, 10%, and 14%, respectively. The transplanted kidney nephron mass may avoid the need for hemodialysis in the early posttransplant period; in the midterm it may help to maintain residual renal function. As in other combined transplant programs (heart-kidney, kidney-pancreas) with irreversible CRF, a GFR < or = 30 to 35 mL/min may be an indication for LKT, but we need more experience.

Combined liver kidney transplantation (LKT) has the potential to provide a complete recovery of liver and kidney failure; the literature reports an increase in LKT in the last few years and an improvement in patient and graft survival. In our experience 15 patients underwent LKT from 1997 to 2005. The mean age was 50 +/- 9 years (range 34 to 63). The patients were affected by viral (n = 9), alcoholic (n = 1), polycystic (n = 2), cholangitis (n = 1), cholestatic (n = 1), or amyloidotic (n = 1) chronic hepatopathy. Chronic renal failure (CRF) was due to polycystic kidney disease (n = 4), IgA (n = 2), interstitial nephropathy (n = 2), glomerulonephritis (n = 4), amyloidosis (n = 1), vascular nephropathy (n = 1), of unknown end-stage renal disease (n = 1). Twelve of 15 patients were on renal dialysis treatment, three patients had moderate/severe CRF. Two patients had previously been transplanted (kidney). All patients were selected based upon blood group identity and negative cross-match before kidney transplant. Histocompatibility matching (HLA) was not included in the selection criteria. We did not observe delayed graft function. After a mean follow-up was 23 +/- 32 months (range 5 to 99), 12 subjects show, normal hepatic and renal function. At the beginning of our experience two patients in bad clinical condition died within 3 months because of sepsis, and one died because of a malignancy after 7 years. Both organs were functioning well in the deceased patients. Survival analysis confirms LKT efficacy: at 5 years follow-up patient survival is 86%, graft survival censored for death 100%. Only two subjects had an acute rejection episode in the first year; the kidney rejection incidence was lower than that reported for an isolated kidney transplant (13% vs 21%).

Combined liver and kidney transplantation (CLKT) has been increasingly used in recent years: 13 of our 19 cases were performed in the last 2 years being 3.2% of our liver transplantation (LT) and kidney transplantation (KT) activity. Only three of them were not on hemodialysis and the scheduling of a CLKT meant being at the top of the waiting list. We accepted only ideal donors and had no case of liver and only one case of kidney delayed graft function. Two deaths occurred during the first postoperative month, due to acute respiratory distress syndrome and multiorgan failure, both in patients with adult polycystic disease who were in poor nutritional condition due to a late indication for CLKT. We had two late deaths, one due to a native kidney tumor at 7 years and one at 8 years due to alcoholic cirrhosis recurrence. The late survival of our patients was 77.3% with all surviving patients showing good liver and kidney function. We planned not to do the KT in the case of a positive preoperative cross-match; but the only positive case became negative 8 hours after LT when we performed the KT. The patient is well after 2 years. The liver does not always protect the kidney if there are preformed antibodies, but we should try every possible technique not to lose the possibility of doing both transplants, because in case of LT alone the patients loses his top position on the CLKT waiting list and often waits years for a kidney.

A pretransplant positive cross-match is a contraindication for kidney transplantation, unlike in liver transplantation (OLT). In combined liver kidney transplantation (LKT) it is hypothesized that liver can protect kidney from rejection. We report the case of a 35-year-old woman on renal replacement therapy with gastrointestinal tract compression due to a hematoma following spontaneous liver rupture (May 2004). She was affected by amyloidosis, treated with a bone marrow autotransplantation (2001). The liver rupture was surgically untreatable, so an LKT was proposed. Panel-reactive antibody was 80% to 100% (complement dependent cytotoxicity) with specific anti-HLA antibodies (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay). A compatible donor was found (July 2004). The cross-match before LKT was positive for B and T cells (score 8): an emergency OLT was performed. Immediately after liver reperfusion the cross-match result was less positive (6) for T cells. After 6 hours it was negative for T and slightly positive for B cells (4): the kidney was transplanted. The immunosuppressive therapy was: alemtuzumab, steroids, and tacrolimus. Renal function immediately recovered. On day 7 a rejection episode was successfully treated by increasing steroids (intravenous bolus). At discharge hepatic and renal function were normal (creatinine 1 mg/dL). They are stable after 1 year. This case showed LKT efficacy even in complex immunological situations. Many immunological mechanisms, still not defined, are hypothesized about the protective role of the liver. This case confirmed experimental data that highlighted that in vivo in humans a cross-match can change from positive to negative after OLT giving highly sensitized patients the possibility for LKT.

Chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) is characterized by progressive renal dysfunction leading in many cases to graft loss. The pathogenesis of CAN involves both immune and nonimmune factors. Concerning immune factors, one of the most remarkable predictors of CAN is acute rejection, which is associated with a worse prognosis if there are multiple episodes or when late onset occurs. Delayed graft function is also a major risk factor for CAN because of a correlation between late restoration of renal function after transplantation and long-term decreased graft survival. High creatinine levels at 6 months and 1 year after transplantation, proteinuria, viral infections, and cardiovascular risk factors are additional significant parameters for the development of CAN. Recent findings suggest that a high renal segmental arterial resistance index measured by Doppler ultrasonography in intrarenal vessels is associated with poor allograft function. Moreover, the study of patient genetic profile represents a new approach to identify predictive factors for CAN.

Aim: We report a series of patients who underwent combined heart-kidney transplantation (CHKT) and combines liver-kidney transplantation (CLKT) at a single center., Methods: From January 1997 to October 2004, 13 CLKT and 2 CHKT were performed. The CLKT indications were as follows: polycystic disease (2), kidney polycystic disease associated with Caroli (1) and cirrhosis-hepatitis C virus (HCVs) (1), chronic glomerulonephritis with cirrhosis-HCV (4), and other diseases (5). From December 2003 to October 2004, 2 patients underwent CHKT for idiopathic cardiomyopathy plus glomerulonephritis and ischemic cardiomyopathy associated with vascular nephritis., Results: In the CLKT group, 1 patient had acute rejection involving both liver and kidney grafts, whereas 1 patient had liver rejection and another 1 had kidney rejection alone. Of the 13 patients, 10 are alive with a mean survival of 583 days (range, 36-2688 days); 2 patients died within 1 month of transplantation (both with polycystic disease) due to ARDS and MOF. Another patient died 6 years and 9 months after CLKT of metastasis from a de novo tumor. In the CHKT group, no patient suffered heart-kidney rejection. They are all alive at 333 and 116 days, with heart and kidney allografts functioning well., Conclusion: In the CLKT group, the worst results were for patients with polycystic disease, in whom a more rigorous selection is necessary because of greater technical difficulties. For the remaining patients we had acceptable complications and excellent long-term results. In selected cases, CHKT can provide long-term graft function and patient survival. Our experience indicates that end-stage kidney failure combined with liver or heart failure does not necessarily preclude dual-organ transplantation.

In this randomized trial renal transplant recipients were treated with basiliximab, everolimus 3 mg/day, low-dose CsA. At transplantation, patients were randomized to stop steroids at the seventh day (group A) or to continue oral steroids in low doses (group B). Of the 113 patients enrolled, 65 were randomized to group A and 68 to group B. All patients were followed for 2 years. During the study 28 (43%) group A patients required reintroduced corticosteroids. One patient died, in group B. The Graft survival rate was 97% in group A and 90% in group B. There were more biopsy-proven rejections in group A (32% vs 16%; P = .044). The mean creatinine clearance was 54 +/- 21 mL/min in group A vs 56 +/- 22 mL/min in group B. Mean levels of serum cholesterol tended to be lower in group A, but the difference was of borderline significance (191 +/- 91 vs 251 +/- 188 mg/dL; P = .07). Vascular thrombosis (0 vs 5) and pneumonia requiring hospitalization (2 vs 7) tended to be more frequent in group B. Only three cases of CMV infection (1 vs 2) occurred. An immunosuppressive therapy with everolimus and low-dose CsA allows one to obtain excellent renal graft survival and stable graft function at 2 years. Early interruption of steroids in patients treated with this regimen may increase the risk of acute rejection, but neither affects graft survival nor graft function, while possibly reducing the risk of hyperlipemia and vascular thrombosis. About 60% of patients given everolimus and low-dose CsA can definitively stop steroids after 1 week.

A 55-year-old Caucasian man who had received a second kidney graft in July 1993, was switched from cyclosporine to tacrolimus in June 2000 due to deterioration of renal function. Thereafter, he began to complain of muscle cramps in both quadriceps with an increased CPK and EMG findings of polyneuropathy. A muscle biopsy demonstrated acute myositis. Prednisone was administered with amelioration of the patient's symptoms, but with persistently increased CPK and myoglobin levels. In February 2001, mycophenolate mofetil was introduced and tacrolimus tapered to 3 mg daily to seek a toxic role of this immunosuppressant, since there was no other cause of myositis. A sudden decrease in CPK was observed, but the complete normalization took place only after its withdrawal in September 2002. This case represents a tacrolimus-associated myositis.

Unlabelled: Organ shortage for transplantation has focused attention on educational interventions. Italy is a nonhomogenous country whose cultural and economic differences are reflected in the health-care system: dialysis is mainly public in the north versus private in the south; and transplantation rates display a wide range from 3.4 to 37.8 per million people in 2002. The aim of the present study was to analyze the opinions of population of high school students (last two years) in two large cities: northern (Torino) and southern (Napoli) Italy, as a knowledge base for a randomized controlled trial on the efficacy of educational interventions on renal replacement therapy and organ donation, targeted to high school students., Methods: This preliminary study included eight public high schools that completed a first and anonymous semistructured questionnaire. Five hundred and eighty nine questionnaires were retrieved in Torino and 539 in Napoli. In both cities most students answered that they would give a kidney to a brother, sister, or partner needing dialysis (Torino: yes 80.6%; no 2.2%, uncertain-blank 17.2%; Napoli: yes 86.1%, no 1.1%; uncertain-blank 12.8%). Only 36.3% of the students in Torino and 37.7% in Napoli answered that they would consent to organ donation, if they had to choose for a strict relative with brain death. Opposition was 28% in Torino and 23.7% in Napoli; 35.7% in Torino and 38.6% in Napoli were blank-uncertain. These data underline the need for detailed information on the opinions of the overall population as basis for tailored educational campaigns.

We present the study design of a prospective, multicenter, randomized trial aimed at comparing the effects of two different combinations of sirolimus. Renal transplant recipients will be allocated to receive either sirolimus and mycophenolate mofetil (group A) or sirolimus and cyclosporine (group B). The primary endpoint will be the graft function at 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months. A number of secondary endpoints will also be considered. To obtain a significant difference in the primary endpoint 180 patients will be enrolled.