Search

Intrathecal (i.t.) injection of leucine-enkephalin (Leu-ENK), co-administered with peptidase inhibitors, phosphoramidon (an endopeptidase 24.11 inhibitor), and bestatin (a general aminopeptidase inhibitor), produced behaviors consisting of the biting and/or licking of the hindpaw and the tail along with hindlimb scratching directed toward the flank, which peaked at 10-15 min after an injection. This characteristic behavior was not observed in mice treated with i.t. Leu-ENK alone. We also investigated the effect of the extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) in spinal processing of nociception induced by i.t. co-administration of Leu-ENK with phospharamidon and bestatin. Western blot analysis of phospho-ERK (pERK) showed a significant increase of pERK2 in the lumbar spinal cord in response to i.t. Leu-ENK co-injected with peptidase inhibitors. The MAP kinase-ERK inhibitor, U0126 dose-dependently attenuated the nociceptive behavior and spinal ERK activation to i.t. Leu-ENK co-injected with peptidase inhibitors. Furthermore, the nociceptive behavior and spinal ERK activation evoked by i.t. Leu-ENK in combination with peptidase inhibitors were inhibited by co-administration of the non-selective δ-opioid receptor antagonist, naltrindole, the selective δ2-opioid receptor antagonist, naltriben, the non-competitive N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) antagonist, MK-801 or the non-selective nitric oxide synthase inhibitor, L-NAME, the selective nNOS inhibitor, N(ω)-propyl-L-arginine or the selective iNOS inhibitor, W1400, but not by the selective δ1-receptor antagonist, BNTX (7-benzylidenenaltrexone). These results suggest that spontaneous nociceptive behaviors produced by i.t. co-administration of Leu-ENK with peptidase inhibitors may be induced by an activation of the glutamate-NO-ERK pathway through the δ2-opioid receptor in the dorsal spinal cord., (Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Nociceptin/orphanin FQ (N/OFQ), the endogenous ligand for the N/OFQ peptide (NOP) receptors, has been shown to be metabolized into some fragments. We examined to determine whether intrathecal (i.t.) N/OFQ (1-13), (1-11) and (1-7) have antinociceptive activity in the pain-related behavior after intraplantar injection of capsaicin. The i.t. administration of N/OFQ (0.3-1.2 nmol) produced an appreciable and dose-dependent inhibition of capsaicin-induced paw-licking/biting response. The N-terminal fragments of N/OFQ, (1-13) and (1-11), were antinociceptive with a potency lower than N/OFQ. Calculated ID₅₀ values (nmol, i.t.) were 0.83 for N/OFQ, 2.5 for N/OFQ (1-13) and 4.75 for N/OFQ (1-11), respectively. The time-course effect revealed that the antinociceptive effects of these N-terminal fragments lasted longer than those of N/OFQ. Removal of amino acids down to N/OFQ (1-7) led to be less potent than N/OFQ and its fragments, (1-13) and (1-11). Antinociception induced by N/OFQ or N/OFQ (1-13) was reversed significantly by i.t. co-injection of [Nphe¹]N/OFQ (1-13)NH₂, a peptidergic antagonist for NOP receptors, whereas i.t. injection of the antagonist did not interfere with the action of N/OFQ (1-11) and (1-7). Pretreatment with the opioid receptor antagonist naloxone hydrochloride did not affect the antinociception induced by N/OFQ and its N-terminal fragments. These results suggest that N-terminal fragments of N/OFQ are active metabolites and may modulate the antinociceptive effect of N/OFQ in the spinal cord. The results also indicate that N/OFQ (1-13) still possess antinociceptive activity through NOP receptors., (Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The present study sought to examine the mechanism of substance P to modulate the antinociceptive action of intrathecal (i.t.) morphine in paw-licking/biting response evoked by subcutaneous injection of capsaicin into the plantar surface of the hindpaw in mice. The i.t. injection of morphine inhibited capsaicin-induced licking/biting response in a dose-dependent manner. Substance P (25 and 50 pmol) injected i.t. alone did not alter capsaicin-induced nociception, whereas substance P at a higher dose of 100 pmol significantly reduced the capsaicin response. Western blots showed the constitutive expression of endopeptidase-24.11 in the dorsal and ventral parts of lumbar spinal cord of mice. The N-terminal fragment of substance P (1-7), which is known as a major product of substance P by endopeptidase-24.11, was more effective than substance P on capsaicin-induced nociception. Combination treatment with substance P (50 pmol) and morphine at a subthreshold dose enhanced the antinociceptive effect of morphine. The enhanced effect of the combination of substance P with morphine was reduced significantly by co-administration of phosphoramidon, an inhibitor of endopeptidase-24.11. Administration of D-isomer of substance P (1-7), [D-Pro(2), D-Phe(7)]substance P (1-7), an inhibitor of [(3)H] substance P (1-7) binding, or antisera against substance P (1-7) reversed the enhanced antinociceptive effect by co-administration of substance P and morphine. Taken together these data suggest that morphine-induced antinociception may be enhanced through substance P (1-7) formed by the enzymatic degradation of i.t. injected substance P in the spinal cord.