1. Randomised phase 2 study of pembrolizumab plus CC-486 versus pembrolizumab plus placebo in patients with previously treated advanced non-small cell lung cancer.
- Author
-
Levy BP, Giaccone G, Besse B, Felip E, Garassino MC, Domine Gomez M, Garrido P, Piperdi B, Ponce-Aix S, Menezes D, MacBeth KJ, Risueño A, Slepetis R, Wu X, Fandi A, and Paz-Ares L
- Subjects
- Adenocarcinoma of Lung pathology, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized administration & dosage, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized therapeutic use, Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological therapeutic use, Azacitidine administration & dosage, Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung pathology, Carcinoma, Squamous Cell pathology, Female, Humans, Lung Neoplasms pathology, Male, Middle Aged, Progression-Free Survival, Survival Rate, Treatment Outcome, Adenocarcinoma of Lung drug therapy, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols therapeutic use, Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung drug therapy, Carcinoma, Squamous Cell drug therapy, Lung Neoplasms drug therapy
- Abstract
Introduction: Preclinical and early clinical studies suggest that combining epigenetic agents with checkpoint inhibitors can potentially improve outcomes in patients with previously treated advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This phase 2 trial examined second-line pembrolizumab + CC-486 (oral azacitidine) in patients with advanced NSCLC., Methods: Patients with one prior line of platinum-containing therapy were randomised in a ratio of 1:1 to CC-486 or placebo, on days 1-14, in combination with pembrolizumab on day 1 of a 21-day cycle. The primary end-point was progression-free survival (PFS). Key secondary end-points included overall survival (OS), overall response rate (ORR) and safety., Results: Among 100 patients randomised (pembrolizumab + CC-486: 51; pembrolizumab + placebo: 49), most were male (57.0%), were white (87.0%) and had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 1 (68.0%). No significant difference in PFS was observed between the pembrolizumab + CC-486 and pembrolizumab + placebo arms (median, 2.9 and 4.0 months, respectively; hazard ratio [HR], 1.374; 90% confidence interval [CI], 0.926-2.038; P = 0.1789). Median OS was 11.9 months versus not estimable (HR, 1.375; 90% CI, 0.830-2.276; P = 0.2968); ORR was 20% versus 14%. Median treatment duration was shorter (15.0 versus 24.1 weeks), and the number of cycles was lower (5.0 versus 7.0) with pembrolizumab + CC-486 versus pembrolizumab + placebo. No new safety signals for CC-486 or pembrolizumab were detected. Treatment-emergent adverse events were more common in the pembrolizumab + CC-486 arm, particularly gastrointestinal, potentially impacting treatment feasibility., Conclusions: No improvement in PFS was observed with pembrolizumab + CC-486 versus pembrolizumab + placebo. Decreased treatment exposure due to adverse events may have impacted efficacy with pembrolizumab + CC-486., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF