Search

Subjectively, we experience a stable representation of the outside world across saccades. Although previous studies have reported that presaccadically acquired visual information influences postsaccadic perception, whether such information's priority to access visual awareness is either reset by each saccade or continuous across saccades remains unclear. To investigate this issue, we combined a breaking continuous flash suppression (b-CFS) with a saccade task. Before each saccade, a grating was presented in the peripheral visual field under suppression. After the saccade, the same grating was again presented under suppression at either the retinotopically matched, the spatiotopically matched, or a control location. By measuring the duration of the grating to break through CFS into awareness after a saccade, we could compare the breakthrough times across stimuli presented at the different locations. No difference in the reaction times between the spatiotopic and control location was observed, indicating that a saccade resets the buildup of an object's priority to access visual awareness. However, a longer breakthrough time was observed for the retinotopic as compared to the control location, suggesting that a form of retinotopic adaptation to the grating suppressed the priority to access visual awareness after a saccade., (Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Human observers maintain a representation of the visual features of objects when they become occluded. This representation facilitates the interpretation of occluded events and allows us to quickly identify objects upon reappearing. Here we investigated whether visual features that change over time are also represented during occlusion. To answer this question we used an illusion from the time perception domain in which the perceived duration of an event increases as its temporal frequency content increases. In the first experiment we demonstrate temporal frequency induced modulation of duration both when the object remains visible as well as when it becomes temporarily occluded. Additionally, we demonstrate that time dilation for temporarily occluded objects cannot be explained by modulations of duration as a result of pre- and post-occlusion presentation of the object. In a second experiment, we corroborate this finding by demonstrating that modulation of the perceived duration of occluded events depends on the expected temporal frequency content of the object during occlusion. Together these results demonstrate that the dynamic properties of an object are represented during occlusion. We conclude that the representations of occluded objects contain a wide range of features derived from the period when the object was still visible, including information about both the static and dynamic properties of the object., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Adaptation to the duration of a visual stimulus causes the perceived duration of a subsequently presented stimulus with a slightly different duration to be skewed away from the adapted duration. This pattern of repulsion following adaptation is similar to that observed for other visual properties, such as orientation, and is considered evidence for the involvement of duration-selective mechanisms in duration encoding. Here, we investigated whether the encoding of duration - by duration-selective mechanisms - occurs early on in the visual processing hierarchy. To this end, we investigated the spatial specificity of the duration after-effect in two experiments. We measured the duration after-effect at adapter-test distances ranging between 0 and 15° of visual angle and for within- and between-hemifield presentations. We replicated the duration after-effect: the test stimulus was perceived to have a longer duration following adaptation to a shorter duration, and a shorter duration following adaptation to a longer duration. Importantly, this duration after-effect occurred at all measured distances, with no evidence for a decrease in the magnitude of the after-effect at larger distances or across hemifields. This shows that adaptation to duration does not result from adaptation occurring early on in the visual processing hierarchy. Instead, it seems likely that duration information is a high-level stimulus property that is encoded later on in the visual processing hierarchy., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

During binocular rivalry, perception alternates between dichoptically presented incompatible images. With larger images, such perceptual alternations will typically start locally and then gradually spread across the image, known as traveling waves of perceptual dominance. Several image-features (such as local contrast) are known to determine where in the image a traveling wave originates. Here we investigate whether orientation contrast in the suppressed image affects these spatial origin(s) of perceptual alternations. The results show that the origins are increasingly biased towards locations of increasing orientation contrast in the suppressed image. This increase in bias is related to the efficiency of visual search for the orientation contrast, tested offline: we find large biases towards orientation contrast when visual search for it is efficient, and small biases when search for it is inefficient. Our results imply that rivalry suppression is not homogenous across the suppressed image, but is dependent on local image-features in the suppressed image. The relation between spatial bias and visual search performance suggests that spatial origins of perceptual alternations are biased to salient locations in the suppressed image. Moreover, the finding that saliency affects the spatial origin of a perceptual alternation is in agreement with the idea that saliency is represented at a monocular, unconscious level of visual processing., (Copyright 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

We investigated whether center-surround interactions affect perceived speed in a manner similar to their effects on direction discrimination thresholds [e.g. Tadin, D., Lappin, J. S., Gilroy, L. A., & Blake, R. (2003). Perceptual consequences of center-surround antagonism in visual motion processing. Nature, 424, 312-315]. Observers were asked to match the speed of a test stimulus (a grating, with fixed contrast and no surround) to that of a reference stimulus of variable contrast and with a variably sized surround, moving at one of two possible velocities (1 and 12cps). At 1-cps, both lowering contrast and increasing surround-size resulted in a decrease in perceived speed, except for very low contrast stimuli, where a larger surround resulted in an increase in perceived speed. Although the effect of surround-size was comparable in the two velocity conditions, the effect of contrast was different at 12-cps. That is, in the 12cps condition, a decrease in perceived speed was observed only for the lowest contrast used. Our results suggest that, at least for the lower velocity used, center-surround interactions affect perceived speed in a manner analogous to their effect on direction discrimination., (Copyright 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

We used binocular rivalry as a psychophysical probe to explore center-surround interactions in orientation, motion and color processing. Addition of the surround matching one of the rival targets dramatically altered rivalry dynamics. For all visual sub-modalities tested, predominance of the high-contrast rival target matched to the surround was greatly reduced-a result that disappeared at low contrast. At low contrast, addition of the surround boosted dominance of orientation and motion targets matched to the surround. This contrast-dependent modulation of center-surround interactions seems to be a general property of the visual system and may reflect an adaptive balance between surround suppression and spatial summation.

When dissimilar stimuli are presented to each eye, perception alternates between both images--a phenomenon known as binocular rivalry. It has been shown that stimuli presented in proximity of rival targets modulate the time each target is perceptually dominant. For example, presenting motion to the region surrounding the rival targets decreases the predominance of the same-direction target. Here, using a stationary concentric grating rivaling with a drifting grating, we show that a drifting surround grating also increases the depth of binocular rivalry suppression, as measured by sensitivity to a speed discrimination probe on the rival grating. This was especially so when the surround moved in the same direction as the grating, and was slightly weaker for opposed directions. Suppression in both cases was deeper than a no-surround control condition. We hypothesize that surround suppression often observed in area MT (V5)-a visual area implicated in visual motion perception-is responsible for this increase in suppression. In support of this hypothesis, monocular and binocular surrounds were both effective in increasing suppression depth, as were surrounds contralateral to the probed eye. Static and orthogonal motion surrounds failed to add to the depth of rivalry suppression. These results implicate a higher-level, fully binocular area whose surround inhibition provides an additional source of suppression which sums with rivalry suppression to effectively deepen suppression of an unseen rival target.

When each eye is confronted with a dissimilar stimulus, the percept will generally alternate between the two. This phenomenon is known as binocular rivalry. Although binocular rivalry occurs at locations where targets overlap spatially, the area surrounding rivalrous targets can modulate their dominance. Here we show that during binocular rivalry of oppositely moving gratings, a surrounding grating moving in the same direction as one of the two leads to increased dominance of the opposite direction of motion in the center. This increased dominance of the opposite direction in the center was observed irrespective of the eye to which the surround was presented. Inspection of the results for different conditions reveals that the preference for the opposite direction of motion cannot be explained by a single mechanism operating beyond binocular fusion. We therefore suggest that this phenomenon is the outcome of center-surround interactions at multiple levels along the pathway of visual motion processing.

Visual processing involves hierarchical stages in which local features are initially analyzed and subsequently grouped into objects and surfaces. In the domain of motion perception, transparent motion has been used as a powerful tool to investigate the mechanisms underlying the grouping of local features. Here, we report a novel way of creating motion transparency from oscillating dots (MTOD). In this stimulus, individual dots move back and forth over a small distance. When the dots are oscillating in synchrony, global surfaces are also perceived as moving back and forth. However, when the oscillation desynchronizes, the percept turns into two moving surfaces that are sliding over each other continuously (streaming motion). The percept of MTOD is similar to conventional transparent motion, where individual dots move only in one direction. Also, when streaming motion is perceived, the detection of oscillation is impaired. This blindness to the oscillation becomes stronger, as the signal strength for the streaming motion is increased. These findings suggest that when global visual representations are constructed, weak and inconsistent local signals are discarded.