Search

Background/aim: Unknown primary tumour (UPT) is the term applied to metastatic cancer, the origin of which remains unidentified. Since cancer treatment is primarily based on the tumour site of origin, treatment of UPT patients is challenging. The number of reports on incidence, treatment and survival of UPT is limited. We hereby report data on patients (2000-2012) with UPT in the Netherlands., Methods: The age-standardised rate (ASR) of 'other and unspecified' malignancies in the Netherlands was compared with other European countries. Patients diagnosed with UPT between 2000 and 2012 were selected from the Netherlands Cancer Registry (NCR) to calculate incidence rates. Patient characteristics, treatment and survival rates were assessed., Results: The ASR of 'other and unspecified' malignancies in the Netherlands did not differ from the European average ASRs (2008-2012). A total of 29,784 patients with an unknown primary tumour were selected from the NCR (2000-2012). The incidence decreased from 14 per 100,000 person years (European standardised rate) in 2000 to 7.0 in 2012. The most common metastatic sites were liver, lymph nodes, bone and lung (42%, 22%, 16% and 14%, respectively), and approximately two-thirds of patients were diagnosed with metastases at a single site. One-third of the patients were treated; these were mainly younger patients. The overall median survival for all patients was 1.7 months. The median survival of untreated patients was 1.0 month and of treated patients 6.3 months., Conclusion: The incidence of UPT between 2000 and 2012 is decreasing in the Netherlands, and one-third of these patients received treatment. Survival after diagnosis is limited to months rather than years., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: The aim of our analysis was to assess the real-world cost-effectiveness of bevacizumab in addition to taxane treatment versus taxane monotherapy for HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer compared with the cost-effectiveness based on the efficacy results from a trial., Methods: A state transition model was built to estimate costs, life years (LYs) and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) for both treatments. Two scenarios were examined: a real-world scenario and a trial-based scenario in which transition probabilities were primarily based on a real-world cohort study and the E2100 trial, respectively. In both scenarios, costs and utility parameter estimates were extracted from the real-world cohort study. Moreover, the Dutch health care perspective was adopted., Results: In both the real-world and trial scenarios, bevacizumab-taxane is more expensive (incremental costs of €56,213 and €52,750, respectively) and more effective (incremental QALYs of 0.362 and 0.189, respectively) than taxane monotherapy. In the real-world scenario, bevacizumab-taxane compared to taxane monotherapy led to an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of €155,261 per QALY gained. In the trial scenario, the ICER amounted to €278,711 per QALY gained., Conclusion: According to the Dutch informal threshold, bevacizumab in addition to taxane treatment was not considered cost-effective for HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer both in a real-world and in a trial scenario., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Aim: Until recently, peritoneal metastases (PM) were regarded as an untreatable condition, regardless of the organ of origin. Currently, promising treatment options are available for selected patients with PM from colorectal, appendiceal, ovarian or gastric carcinoma. The aim of this study was to investigate the incidence, treatment and survival of patients presenting with PM in whom the origin of PM remains unknown., Methods: Data from patients diagnosed with PM of unknown origin during 1984-2010 were extracted from the Eindhoven Cancer Registry. European age-standardised incidence rates were calculated and data on treatment and survival were analysed., Results: In total 1051 patients were diagnosed with PM of unknown origin. In 606 patients (58%) the peritoneum was the only site of metastasis, and 445 patients also had other metastases. Chemotherapy usage has increased from 8% in the earliest period to 16% in most recent years (p=.016). Median survival was extremely poor with only 42days (95% confidence interval (CI) 39-47days) and did not change over time. Median survival of patients not receiving chemotherapy was significantly worse than of those receiving chemotherapy (36 versus 218days, p<.0001)., Conclusion: The prognosis of PM of unknown origin is extremely poor and did not improve over time. Given the recent progress that has been achieved in selected patients presenting with PM, maximum efforts should be undertaken in order to diagnose the origin of PM as accurately as possible. Potentially effective treatment strategies should be further explored for patients in whom the organ of origin remains unknown., (Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Patients with an unknown primary tumour (UPT) represent 5-10% of all new cancer patients. Data on survival and prognostic factors of UPTs are based on selected patient series from specialised institutions. Population-based data on incidence, histology and determinants of survival for patients with UPT are not available. All patients diagnosed with UPT between 1984 and 1992 and entered in the population-based Eindhoven Cancer Registry for Southeast Netherlands were included. Follow-up of vital status is complete up to 1999. 1285 patients were registered. In 1024 patients, the diagnosis was confirmed histopathologically: 479 (47%) had adenocarcinoma, 453 (44%) poorly differentiated carcinoma (PDC) or adenocarcinoma (PDA), 76 (7%) squamous cell carcinoma and 16 patients (2%) had an undifferentiated malignant neoplasm. In 26% of these patients with UPT, the tumour was already widely disseminated at presentation. The majority of patients (67%) received only supportive treatment. The median survival was 11 weeks and only 15% were still alive 1 year after diagnosis. Favourable subgroups comprised young patients and patients with metastases localised in lymph nodes. In 261 cases, the diagnosis was made clinically. These patients were evaluated separately. They were older than the biopsy-confirmed patients, received less cancer therapy and their prognosis was even worse (median survival of 7 weeks). In a comparison with data from a tertiary referral centre in the United States of America (USA), our patients were older, received less therapy and had a poorer prognosis. Demographics of our favourable subgroup resembled the patients from the American study. The differences were most likely caused by the differences in the patient populations. In conclusion, we have demonstrated in a population-based study that the prognosis for patients with UPT is more unfavourable than suggested in most clinical studies.