Search

Objectives: Crizotinib remains one of the most commonly used targeted therapies for ALK fusion-positive patients. However, the mutational profiles and mechanisms of resistance to first-line crizotinib treatment remain to be thoroughly examined., Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 125 ALK-positive patients with histological and/or cytological diagnosis of NSCLC. Of these, baseline samples were available from 62 patients and 63 had resistance samples following first-line crizotinib treatment, with 18 patients having paired baseline and resistance samples. All patients were genetically profiled by NGS using a 139 lung cancer gene panel (Pulmocan®, Nanjing Geneseeq Technology Inc.). Survival associations of progression-free survival (PFS) and resistance mechanisms were evaluated in relation to ALK fusion variants and background genetic alterations., Results: The median age of the cohort was 53 years old (range 26-78; 46.4 % females). Three novel ALK fusion partners were identified, including PSME4, cullin3 (CUL3) and coiled-coil domain containing 85A (CCDC85A). Among the different ALK fusion genes, patients carrying the v3 variant experienced worse PFS outcome compared with other non-v3 fusions (P = 0.01) in response to first-line crizotinib. Profiling of the genetic landscape revealed TP53 as the most frequently co-mutated gene, alterations of which were associated with unfavorable outcome (P = 0.024) and were among the secondary acquired mutations in the resistance samples. Examinations of the resistance mechanisms showed that the v3 variant was more likely to acquire ALK activating mutations (P = 0.04). Off-target resistance mechanisms included mutations in genes in the RAS/MAPK and its parallel pathway genes, such as ERBB2, BRAF, KRAS, FGFR3, NF1 and CREBBP., Conclusion: In this study, through profiling of the mutational landscape of ALK-positive advanced NSCLCs both at baseline and disease progression, we characterized resistance mechanisms and molecular correlations of PFS in response to first-line crizotinib. Our findings may facilitate rational selection of subsequent ALK TKIs in the clinic., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: The J-ALEX study compared the efficacy and safety of alectinib with crizotinib in Japanese patients with advanced ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Superiority in independent review facility (IRF)-assessed progression-free survival (PFS) was demonstrated for alectinib at the second pre-planned interim PFS analysis (data cutoff: December 3, 2015; hazard ratio [HR] 0.34, 99.7 % confidence interval [CI]: 0.17-0.71, P < 0.0001). We report final PFS data and the second pre-planned interim analysis of overall survival (OS) and safety (data cutoff: June 30, 2018)., Methods: Patients aged ≥20 years who were ALK inhibitor-naïve and chemotherapy-naïve, or had received one prior chemotherapy regimen, were randomized to receive alectinib 300 mg (n = 103) or crizotinib 250 mg (n = 104) twice daily. The primary end point was IRF-assessed PFS. Secondary end points included OS and safety. All patients entered survival follow-up in July 2018., Results: Median follow-up was 42.4 months for alectinib and 42.2 months for crizotinib. Sustained improvement in IRF-assessed PFS with alectinib was shown (HR 0.37, 95 % CI: 0.26-0.52; median PFS 34.1 months vs 10.2 months crizotinib). At the second interim OS analysis, superiority of alectinib to crizotinib could not be concluded (stratified HR 0.80, 99.8799 % CI: 0.35-1.82, stratified log-rank P = 0.3860; median OS not reached alectinib vs 43.7 months crizotinib). Fewer alectinib-treated patients experienced grade ≥3 adverse events (36.9 % vs 60.6 % crizotinib)., Conclusions: At the final PFS analysis, alectinib continued to demonstrate superiority in IRF-assessed PFS versus crizotinib in ALK-inhibitor-naïve ALK-positive NSCLC, with a favorable safety profile. OS follow-up continues., (Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Objectives: A pooled analysis of two open-label phase II studies of alectinib (NP28673 [NCT01801111] and NP28761 [NCT01871805]) demonstrated clinical activity in patients with advanced, anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive (ALK+) non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) previously treated with crizotinib. Longer-term and final pooled analyses of overall survival (OS) and safety data from the two studies are presented here., Patients and Methods: The pooled population totaled 225 patients (NP28673: n = 138, NP28761: n = 87) who received 600 mg oral alectinib twice daily until disease progression, death, or withdrawal. OS was defined as the time from date of first treatment to date of death, regardless of cause. OS was estimated using Kaplan-Meier methodology, with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) determined using the Brookmeyer-Crowley method. Safety was assessed through adverse event (AE) reporting., Results: Baseline characteristics were generally comparable between the studies. At final data cutoff (October 27, 2017 [NP28673], October 12, 2017 [NP28761]; median pooled follow-up time, ∼21 months), 53.3% of patients had died, 39.1% were alive and in follow-up, and 7.6% had withdrawn consent or were lost to follow-up. Alectinib demonstrated a median OS of 29.1 months (95% CI 21.3-39.0). No new or unexpected safety findings were observed. The most common all-grade AEs included constipation (39.1%), fatigue (35.1%), peripheral edema (28.4%), myalgia (26.2%), and nausea (24.0%)., Conclusion: Updated results from this pooled analysis further demonstrate that alectinib has robust clinical activity and a manageable safety profile in patients with advanced, ALK+ NSCLC pretreated with crizotinib., (Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Objective: Metastasized non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with an anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) rearrangement is usually sensitive to a range of ALK-tyrosine kinase inhibitors. ALK-positive NSCLC have been identified in pivotal phase III trials with fluorescence in situ hybridization (ALK FISH+). These tumors are also expressing the fusion product (ALK immunohistochemistry (IHC)+). However, discrepant cases occur, including ALK IHC + FISH-. The aim of this study was to collect ALK IHC + cases and compare within this group response to crizotinib treatment of ALK FISH + cases with ALK FISH- cases., Materials and Methods: In this European prospective multicenter research study patients with Stage IV ALK IHC + NSCLC treated with crizotinib were enrolled. Tumor slides were validated centrally for ALK IHC and ALK FISH., Results: Registration of 3523 ALK IHC tests revealed a prevalence of 2.7% (n = 94) ALK IHC + cases. Local ALK FISH analysis resulted in 48 concordant (ALK IHC+/FISH+) and 16 discordant (ALK IHC+/FISH-) cases. Central validation revealed 37 concordant and 7 discordant cases, 5 of which had follow-up. Validation was hampered by limited amount of tissue in biopsy samples. The PFS at 1 year for ALK concordant and discordant was 58% and 20%, respectively (HR = 2.4; 95% CI: 0.78-7.3; p = 0.11). Overall survival was significantly better for concordant cases than discordant cases after central validation (HR=4.5; 95% CI= 1.2-15.9; p=0.010., Conclusion: ALK IHC + FISH- NSCLC is infrequent and associated with a worse outcome on personalized treatment. A suitable predictive testing strategy may be to screen first with IHC and then confirm with FISH instead of considering ALK IHC equivalent to ALK FISH according to the current guidelines., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

The ALK receptor tyrosine kinase (ALK) gene encodes a transmembrane protein rearranged in 2-7% of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cases. This gene has become the second most studied therapeutic target after EGFR due to the implied therapeutic opportunities. While the diagnostic of ALK rearrangements is well established, small molecules targeting ALK are in constant evolution because tumor cells eventually will develop mechanisms of resistance. In this review we describe the biology of the ALK gene, alterations, epidemiology, diagnostic tests as well as strategies of treatment., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: High concordance has been observed between Ventana D5F3 ALK immunohistochemistry (IHC) and fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH) in lung adenocarcinoma (LADC). However, whether a similar conclusion can be applied to lung squamous-cell carcinoma (LSCC) has remained unclear. We therefore evaluated the ALK (anaplastic lymphoma kinase) status and the therapeutic effect of an ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) in IHC- or FISH-positive LSCC., Materials and Methods: A total of 2403 LSCC patients from three institutions were screened for ALK aberration by IHC. All IHC-positive cases were subjected to FISH (with an approximately equal number of negative cases as a control group) and next-generation sequencing (NGS). Clinical efficacy was evaluated for the patients who received TKI therapy., Results: In 2403 cases of LSCC, 37 cases were identified as ALK-positive by IHC. After quality control, 28 cases were succeeded by FISH (six with insufficient tissue, three with lack of signals) and 13 by NGS (24 failed due to insufficient samples or poor DNA quality); the percentage of non-diagnostic tests was 24.3% (9/37) and 64.9% (24/37), respectively. Four cases (4/2394, 0.17%) analyzed by FISH were determined as ALK-positive. For the control group (40 ALK IHC), FISH demonstrated no samples with ALK gene fusion. The concordance between ALK IHC- and ALK FISH-positive results was 14.3% (4/28). In the 13 cases studied by NGS, two cases showed ALK-EML4 fusion (consistent with two FISH-positive results), and two cases were interpreted as harboring an ALK-association gene mutation. Among four patients (two FISH-positive and two IHC-positive only cases) receiving TKI therapy, two patients had stable disease and the other two had progressive disease., Conclusions: The positive concordance rate of ALK IHC and FISH in LSCC is far less than that reported for LADC. Therefore, ALK IHC detection in LSCC cannot be used as a diagnostic method for ALK rearrangement., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

The incidence of CNS metastasis at the time of diagnosis of and during the natural disease history of advanced ROS1+ NSCLC is largely unknown. It is generally believed that the incidence of CNS metastasis is lower in ROS1+ NSCLC than ALK+ NSCLC as ROS1 fusions are regarded as a less powerful driver mutation than ALK fusions in ALK+ NSCLC based on the longer progression-free survival of ROS1+ NSCLC patients than ALK+ NSCLC patients treated with crizotinib. Here we reviewed the incidence of CNS metastasis from prospective clinical trials and retrospective case series from primarily single institution. The incidence of CNS metastasis in ROS1+ NSCLC patients at the time of diagnosis ranged from 20% to mid 30% while the incidence of CNS metastasis can be as high as in the mid 50% range post-crizotinib indicating CNS metastasis is indeed a major morbidity for ROS1+ NSCLC patients throughout the course of treatment. To date 22 fusion partners in ROS1+ NSCLC have been reported in the literature and one report has indicated CD74-ROS1 fusion variant increased the predilection for CNS metastasis than non-CD74-ROS1 fusion variants. We reviewed reported intra-cranial activity of all preclinical and clinical development stage ROS1 TKIs and pemetrexed-based chemotherapy in ROS1+ NSCLC patients. While several ROS1 TKIs (i.e. entrectinib, cabozantinib, lorlatinib, repotrectinib) have reported intra-cranial response rates, there is no literature reporting on the intra-cranial activity of pemetrexed-based chemotherapy in ROS1+ NSCLC patients. In summary, better understanding the high incidence of CNS metastasis in ROS1+ NSCLC patients, how certain ROS1 fusion variant may increase the incidence of CNS metastasis, and any intra-cranial efficacy data of pemetrexed in ROS1+ NSCLC are all urgently needed., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), including crizotinib and several next generation TKIs, have demonstrated beneficial clinical outcomes in ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, resistance mechanisms following multiple TKI treatments in ALK-positive NSCLC are not fully elucidated., Materials and Methods: Mutation profiles of 422 cancer-relevant genes in 52 patients with post-TKI biopsy samples were analyzed using next-generation sequencing (NGS), and compared between patients receiving crizotinib alone (n = 35) and multi-TKIs (n = 17)., Results: EML4-ALK variant 3 is the most frequent ALK variants in this cohort, followed by EML4-ALK variant 1. Half of the patients harbored ALK activating mutations upon progression on crizotinib treatment. After multi-TKIs treatment, 59% of the cases developed resistant ALK mutations, and concomitant ALK activating mutations were more commonly observed in this cohort (P = 0.031). Specifically, ALK G1269 A, L1196 M, and C1156Y substitutions were more common in crizotinib-alone samples, while ALK G1202R was significantly more enriched post-multi-TKIs (P = 0.009). Activated bypass signaling tended to be more prevalent in patients post-multi-TKIs. Furthermore, dual activation of ALK and bypass signaling was more frequently found in the multi-TKIs group (5/17, 29%) in contrast to crizotinib-alone (2/35, 6%) (P = 0.031). Additionally, concurrent TP53 mutation demonstrated significantly shorter progression-free survival (PFS) compared with TP53 wildtype in crizotinib-alone group (median PFS: 8 vs 13 months, Hazard Ratio = 1.494, P = 0.019)., Conclusion: Concurrent ALK activating mutations and/or upregulated bypass signaling are more enriched in patients undergoing multiple ALK TKI treatments compared to crizotinib alone. Concomitant TP53 mutation correlated to unfavorable survival when receiving a single TKI crizotinib., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Acquired secondary mutations in the anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) gene have been identified in ALK-rearranged non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients who are resistant to treatment with the ALK inhibitor crizotinib. We sought to uncover novel mutations that contribute to resistance in these patients., Materials and Methods: Following clinical diagnosis and development of crizotinib treatment resistance, tissue and ctDNA samples were obtained from the 60-year-old patient and subjected to next-generation sequencing for identification of mutations contributing to drug resistance., Results: We identified a novel acquired NSCLC ALK G1128A mutation in the ALK + NSCLC patient who progressed on crizotinib after a short partial response to the drug. This mutation, ALK G1128A, is located at the glycine loop (the P-loop) of the ALK tyrosine kinase domain. As a gain-of-function mutation, ALK G1128A increases kinase activity and transformation ability, perhaps conferring resistance to crizotinib., Conclusions: This case further illustrates the importance of comprehensive genomic profiling of resistant tumors for tailoring treatment decisions after disease progression on crizotinib in ALK + NSCLC in the era of rapidly developing new-generation ALK inhibitors and other therapeutic strategies., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: Despite improved progression-free survival, most patients treated with the first generation ALK inhibitor crizotinib ultimately experience central nervous system (CNS) progression. Brain metastases (BM) are associated with high clinical burden in patients with advanced anaplastic lymphoma kinase positive (ALK+) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In this study we estimate the real-world economic burden of BM in newly diagnosed ALK+ NSCLC patients and investigate whether alectinib, a second generation ALK inhibitor that delays CNS progression, may help reduce healthcare costs in patients with ALK+ NSCLC., Materials and Methods: Cost of BM was measured in ALK+ NSCLC patients identified from a stacked PharMetrics Plus and MarketScan claims database from January 2008 to March 2016 and December 2015, respectively. Per patient per month (PPPM) cost of BM was calculated as the difference in baseline-adjusted total costs in patients with and without BM over a variable follow-up period of up to 24 months. Cumulative incidence of new BM was derived from 88 alectinib-treated and 93 crizotinib-treated patients without baseline BM in a randomized phase III clinical trial, ALEX (NCT02075840). Costs of BM per patient were then calculated by applying the PPPM BM cost to the number of incident BM patients in each treatment cohort., Results: 207 patients with no BM and 198 with BM were selected from the claims database. Total cost of BM was estimated at $6,029 PPPM. 24-month cumulative incidence rates of BM from the clinical trial were 7.2% and 45.3% for alectinib and crizotinib, respectively. Over follow-up, alectinib was estimated to reduce BM-related costs by $41,434 per patient compared to crizotinib., Conclusion: BM is associated with substantial economic burden. Alectinib was estimated to reduce BM-related costs by preventing or delaying the occurrence of BM compared to crizotinib., (Copyright © 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)